⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kassie M.N. Wright”

Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-01073-COA ALFONZO LASHAWN McDONALD A/K/A APPELLANT ALPHONSO LASHAWN McDONALD A/K/A ALPHONZO LASHAWN McDONALD v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/16/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2024-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00060-SCT IN RE: DEATH INVESTIGATION OF CHRISTIAN ANDREACCHIO, THE ESTATE OF CHRISTIAN ANDREACCHIO, DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: CYNTHIA HEWES SPEETJENS GARRISON MICHAEL WHITE
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2024-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-2122 Filed October 30, 2024 ANNA J. STONER, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of L.T., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. KASSI TAFT and TYLER TAFT, Defendant-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Monroe County, Greg Milani, Judge. A plaintiff appeals the judgment enter
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2025-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-00482-SCT JEFFREY DALE BUSBY a/k/a JEFFERY BUSBY a/k/a JEFFEREY BUSBY a/k/a JEFF BUSBY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/10/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: EDWARD ANDERSON KRAMER THOMAS EUGENE WHITFIELD, JR.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00011-COA DECARLOS SANTEZ CLARK A/K/A CARLOS APPELLANT A/K/A DECARLOS CLARKE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/08/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAUDERD
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-09-12 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 23-1723 and 23-1724 __________ LEE EVANS v. NEWARK CITY; FORMER MAYOR, COREY A. BOOKER; OFFICER JOE HADLEY; DETECTIVE RASHID SABUR; DETECTIVE KEITH SHEPPARD; SGT. DARNELL HENRY; DETECTIVE JOSEPH HADLEY; OFFICER ANGEL RAMOS; NEWARK POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00719-COA ERNEST EDWARDS A/K/A ERNEST JAMES APPELLANT EDWARDS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/17/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANDREW K. HOWORTH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETTE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY
Murphey v. Pearsonpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2022-10-19 · Published · cited 1× · 981 N.W.2d 410; 2022 S.D. 62
#29766-aff in pt & rev in pt-PJD 2022 S.D. 62 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** LISA MURPHEY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JARED PEARSON, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-01-19 · Published · cited 3× · 2017 NY Slip Op 425; 148 A.D.3d 59; 45 N.Y.S.3d 84
*61 OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J.P. The central issue in these appeals concerns the validity of a 1975 lease agreement for three combined apartments that provided, inter alia, that the rent-regulated status of the combined unit would be changed from rent-controlled to rent-stabilized
New York Supreme Court · 2013-02-06 · Published · cited 1× · 39 Misc. 3d 513
OPINION OF THE COURT Martin E. Ritholtz, J. The questions involved in this action are whether there should *515be any consequences to plaintiffs who commenced a litigation, waged for several years, but failed to preserve and safeguard the documents necessary to provide responses to defendants during discovery, and what ramifications and/or sanction
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2003-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 124 S.W.3d 837; 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 10448; 2003 WL 22927364
Opinion The jury convicted Kenneth Joe Presswood of recklessly, by omission, causing serious bodily injury to an elderly person, a second degree felony. The trial court *Page 839 assessed appellant's punishment at confinement for 8 years and a $10,000 fine. The trial court suspended the confinement portion of the sentence and placed appellant on community supervision for 8 years. We affirm. Appellant brings four points of e
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CT-00180-SCT CYNTHIA BURFORD a/k/a CYNTHIA LAURINE BURFORD v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/18/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT, JR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BILBO MITCHELL PATRICK IAN STUBBS
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-00180-COA CYNTHIA BURFORD A/K/A CYNTHIA APPELLANT LAURINE BURFORD v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/18/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CLARKE COUNTY CIRCUIT
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016-03-11 · Published · cited 1× · 473 Mass. 798; 46 N.E.3d 984
*799 Botsford, J. A Superior Court jury found the defendant guilty of the attempted armed robbery and murder in the first degree of Michelle Diaz on theories of extreme atrocity or cruelty and felony-murder. In this direct appeal from his convictions, the defendant challenges the admission in evidence of hi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00523-COA KARON McVAY A/K/A KARON DESHAWN APPELLANT McVAY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/04/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAUDERDALE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996-06-04 · Published · cited 4× · 203 B.R. 1000; 1996 WL 756543
203 B.R. 1000 (1996) In re HILLSBOROUGH HOLDINGS CORP., et al., Debtors. James W. WALTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION and Jim Walter Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 89-9715-8P1 to 89-9746-8P1 and 90-11997-8P1. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 4, 1996. *1001
Ashley v. Hoytpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996-02-28 · Published · cited 17× · 912 P.2d 393; 139 Or. App. 385; 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 250
912 P.2d 393 (1996) 139 Or. App. 385 Verneda Villarreal ASHLEY, Appellant, v. Sonia HOYT, Superintendent, Oregon Womens Correctional Institution, Respondent. Nos. 94C-11348-2; CA A86454. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 20, 1995. Decided February 28, 1996. *394 Walt
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007-08-02 · Published · cited 56× · 736 N.W.2d 619; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 444; 2007 WL 2199236
736 N.W.2d 619 (2007) Diane LORIX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. CROMPTON CORPORATION, et al., Respondents, Flexsys NV, et al., Defendants, Bayer Corporation, Defendant. No. A05-2148. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 2, 2007. *622 Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Reinhardt Wendorf &
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012-12-11 · Published · cited 1× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 572; 2012 WL 6184916; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175742
OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff, Timothy Hupp (“Timothy”), was born on June 10, 1997. He resides with his parents, Plaintiffs Jacqueline and Timothy Hupp, in Woodsfield, Ohio. Timothy has been diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) and Asperger’s Syndrome, a developmental disorder that manifests traits- similar to autism. Children with A
District Court, D. Delaware · 1988-08-15 · Published · cited 7× · 693 F. Supp. 88; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10024; 1988 WL 90604
693 F.Supp. 88 (1988) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PANHANDLE EASTERN CORP., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., Trunkline Gas Co., Trunkline LNG Co., General Dynamics Corp., Moore McCormack Resources, Inc., Moore McCormack LNG Transport, Inc., Morgas, Inc., Pantheon, Inc., Pelmar Co., and Lachmar, a Delaware General Partnership, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 87-190-JLL. United States District Court,