Cases

915 N.E.2d 1026 (2009) Dustin NEFF, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 29A02-0904-CR-332. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 3, 2009. *1029 Steven Stoesz, Stoesz & Stoesz, Westfield, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Karl Scharnberg, Deputy At

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court following Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company's ("State Farm") Motion to Dismiss with prejudice (ECF DKT # 8) Plaintiff Charles Cranfield's class action lawsuit. (ECF DKT # 1, Ex. 1). For the following reasons, the Court grants this motion. Procedural Background On April 22,

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. This matter is before the court on a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), filed by defendants Sandoz, Inc. (Sandoz) and Eon Labs, Inc. (Eon). Plaintiffs Frederick and Barbara Arters bring this five-count complaint alleging negligence, violation of the Ohio Products Liability Act, breach of implied

454 F.Supp.2d 692 (2006) Dominic MUSARRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIGITAL DISH, INC., Defendant. No. C2-05-545. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 28, 2006. *693 *694 John Spenceley Marshall, Edward Reilley Forman, Louis Abraham Jacobs, Steven D. Dransfield, Ma

752 F.Supp. 208 (1990) Karl LEWIS v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., etc. Civ. A. No. 89-652. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 17, 1990. Gerald David Issokson, Barkan & Neff, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff. Jill Lynn Ondrejko, U.S. Atty's. Office, New Orleans, La., for defendant. ORDER AND REASONS FELDMAN, District

764 F.Supp.2d 707 (2011) Daniel KNEPPER, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 09-cv-2069. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. February 16, 2011. *708 Fran L. Rudich, Seth R. Lesser, Klafter Olsen & Lesser LLP, Rye Brook, NY, Peter D. Winebrake, R. Andrew Santillo, Mark J. Gottesfeld, The Wi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss filed June 20, 2012 by Defendants Temple-Inland, Inc. (“Temple-Inland”), Kenneth M. Jastrow II (“Jastrow”), Kenneth R. Dubuque (“Dubuque”), Ronald D. Murff (“Murff’), and Craig E. Gifford (“Gifford”) (collectively, “Defendants”) at documents 37, 42, 44, and 47. The Motions seek dismissal of P

Per Curiam. The issue presented here is whether the redemption period on a piece of property purchased at a sheriffs sale is one year from the date of sale pursuant to MCL 600.3240(8); MSA 27A.3240(8) or thirty days from the date of sale pursuant to MCL 600.3240(7); MSA 27A.3240(7). i Plaintiff Pat Gitler appeals as of right from an *175

Claude E. Smith was an inmate under the control of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Apparently, as the result of confusing Smith with another inmate with a similar name, unnecessary surgery was performed on Smith. As a result, Smith filed a lawsuit. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction has a contract with the Ohio State University Hospitals ("University Hospitals"). University Hospitals in turn has a contract with a variety of corporations to provid

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Mar 18 2015, 9:07 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Allenn Peterson Gregory

652 F.3d 680 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Angel GAYTAN-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-4615. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 12, 2011. Before: MERRITT and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; FORESTER, District Judge.[*] ORDER PER CURIAM. This matter is before the court upon consider

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BELOT, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs amended motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. (Doc. 155). Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all of the other half-million members of the Bass Anglers Sportsman Society (“B.A.S.S.”), an unincorporated association, seeks to recover funds that allegedly have been looted

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jul 27 2015, 6:25 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Anthony W. Taylor-El

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Oct 30 2015, 10:18 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Carl Johnson Gregory F. Zoeller Pendleton, Indiana

884 A.2d 901 (2005) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Samuel FELICIANO, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted June 6, 2005. Filed September 26, 2005. Karl Baker, Public Defender, Philadelphia, for appellant. Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Asst. District Atty., Philadelphia, for Com., appellee. *902 BEFO

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 15 2016, 5:52 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 31 2016, 8:25 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicata, co

93 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (2000) 22 Cal.4th 352 993 P.2d 334 LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR SURVIVAL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. S073451. Supreme Court of California. March 2, 2000. James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Frederick N. Merkin, Byron R. Boeckman and Debbie Lew

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-1044 ______________ KUNLGUNDA DIRAUF; LUDWIG DIRAUF; BRUNO ECKL; HILDEGARD ECKL; DORIS FABIAN; ALEXANDER FISCHER; GERHARD FLAIG; KARIN FLAIG; DANIEL GEBERT; FRITZ GEBERT; MONIKA GEBERT; THOMAS GEBERT; HELGA HAAG; MARTIN HAAG; ANNY HANISCH; ANTON HELL; ALFRED HERRMANN; IRENE HERRMANN; WALTER HORBER; CHRISTINA K

70 P.3d 855 (2003) 2003 OK 49 John R. BOOTH and Thomas Frank Booth, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Bobbie Jean McKNIGHT, Defendant/Appellant. No. 95,339. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 13, 2003. *857 Karl D. Jones, Jones & Gardner, Vinita, OK, for Appellant. Dan A. Erwin, Chandler, OK, for Appellees.<