Cases

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice Appellant Tyrell Benson appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. As a juvenile, Benson committed multiple offenses resulting in multiple convictions and sentences. He alleges that one of his sentences exceeds his life expectancy without the opportunity for parole, resulting in a de facto life sentence in violation of Graham v. Florida ,

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice hOn July 13, 2015, the Lincoln County Circuit Court received from appellant, Frank Watts, a pro se habeas corpus petition and a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The circuit clerk did not file or assign a case number to either petition. On August 28, 2015, Watts filed his notice of appeal in which he sought

PER CURIAM hln 1988, appellant Richard Alan Davis was found guilty by a jury in the Pulaski County Circuit Court in case number 60CR-87-1540 of capital murder, aggravated robbery, and theft of property. An aggregate sentence of life imprisonment without parole was imposed. Also in 1988, Davis was found guilty by a jury in Pulaski County in case number 60CR-

Klingensmith, J. Appellant, Karen Winslow, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing her counter-petition for administration with prejudice for failure to file , a pleading satisfying the statutory requirements set forth in section 733.212(3), Florida Statutes (2013), within the applicable statute of limitations. Upon review of the pleadings filed by appellant, we find appellan

353 S.W.3d 364 (2011) Karen BROOKS, Appellant, v. James E. O'KELLEY, et al., Respondent. No. ED 95982. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. October 18, 2011. Rehearing Denied December 5, 2011. Brendan D. Roediger, Saint Louis University Law Clinic, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. James E. O'Kelley, St. Louis, MO, Responde

652 F.3d 915 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Wayne KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2494. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 15, 2011. Filed: August 30, 2011. Richard Lane Hughes, Little Rock, AR, for appellant. Karen Whatley, Little Rock, AR, for appellee. Before LOKEN and

286 S.W.3d 746 (2008) Stephen Brent KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CA CR 07-633. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 3, 2008. *747 Darrell E. Davis, Jr., Fayetteville, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by: Nicana C. Sherman, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. KAREN R. BAKER, Judge.

670 F.Supp.2d 943 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Eric Wayne KELLEY, Defendant. No. 4:07CR00126 JLH. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. November 16, 2009. *945 Karen D. Whatley, U.S. Attorney's Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff. OPINION AND ORDER J. LEO

629 F.Supp.2d 115 (2009) Andrew GODDARD, Plaintiff, v. William J. KELLEY, Daniel Humphreys, and Thomas Manning, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-10705-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 31, 2009. *119 Jennifer L. Bills, Howard Friedman, David Milton, Law Offices of Howard Friedman, PC, Boston, MA, for Plain

Fader, C.J. This appeal requires us to determine: (1) whether a de facto parent is eligible for an award of attorney's fees and costs incurred in a dispute over custody and visitation; and (2) whether such an award can be made against a non-parent who intervenes in such a dispute. We conclude that, under § 12-103(a)(1) of the Family Law Article (Repl. 2012; Supp. 201

THOMAS, J. In this non-Engle 1 progeny tobacco case, Appellant appeals a directed verdict in favor of Appellees on her negligence and strict liability claims, the trial court’s denial of her request for a jury instruction addressing a claim of negligent misrepresentation, and the final judgment in favor of Appellees on

770 N.E.2d 1130 (2002) 331 Ill. App.3d 253 264 Ill.Dec. 434 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-00-0764. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. May 13, 2002. *1131 Richard A. Devine, State's At

151 B.R. 790 (1992) In re M. Dana KELLEY, Debtor, Bobbett HOLLOWAY f/k/a Bobbett Keith Kelley, Plaintiff, v. Milton Dana KELLEY, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-48566-H5-7, Adv. No. 92-4071. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 29, 1992. Roy Keezel, Roy Keezel PC, Houston, TX, for debtor. J. Mark Davis, Martin & Farley,

710 N.E.2d 163 (1999) 304 Ill. App.3d 628 237 Ill.Dec. 740 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-97-1069. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 31, 1999. *166 Arleen Johnson, Chicago, for

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge, dissenting. I. “If there is one doctrine more deeply rooted than any other in the process of constitutional adjudication, it is that we *1334ought not to pass on questions of constitutionality ... unless such adjudication is unavoidable.” Spector v. McLaughlin, 323 U.S. 101, 103, 65 S.Ct.

205 F.Supp.2d 930 (2002) Judith M. KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 02 C 1262. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 6, 2002. *931 Karen I. Ward, Byron Mason, Equip for Equality, Inc., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Patricia Carroll-Smith, Tracey Renee Ladner, Gia L. Morris,

196 F.Supp.2d 728 (2002) Judith M. KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 02C 1262. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 23, 2002. Byron L. Mason, Karen I. Ward, Equip for Equality, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Patricia M. Carroll-Smit, Tracey Renee Ladner, Gia L. Morris, City of Chicago, Law Department Corporatio

224 F.Supp.2d 1082 (2002) Sandra KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 1:01-CV-740. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 2, 2002. John H. Seale, Seale Stover & Bisbey, Beaumont, TX, for plaintiffs. Karen Lee Spivey, Mark William Frasher, Pate & Dodson, Beaumont, TX, for defendant.

379 S.C. 437 (2008) 665 S.E.2d 237 Cody Steven POWELL, by and through his Conservator, Kelly H. KELLEY, and his natural and legal guardian, Elizabeth Powell, Respondent, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Karen P. Unrue, and Travis Powell, Defendants, and Elizabeth Powell, Defendant/Intervenor, of whom Bank of America is the, Appellant/Respondent, and Elizabeth Powell is the, Respondent/Appellant. No. 44

MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEARIE, District Judge. This case involves four separate actions arising out of allegedly fraudulent disclosures made by defendant CINAR Corporation (“CINAR” or “the Company”) and its officers in various public financial statements issued during the period from April 8, 1998 through March 10, 2000. The first suit, In re CINAR Corporation Securities Litigation, No