Cases

199 S.W.3d 79 (2004) Johnny RATLIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 04-714. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 2, 2004. *80 William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, by: Erin Vinett, Deputy Public Defender, Little Rock, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace, Ass't Att'y Gen.,

MURDOCK, Justice. The State Comptroller, Thomas L. White, Jr. (“the comptroller”), appeals from a preliminary injunction entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in response to an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by Karen John, the Alabama Education Association (“the AEA”), Randy Hebson, and the Alabama State Employees Association (“the ASEA”). We reverse and remand.1

Matter of Ratliff v Town of Nelson (2024 NY Slip Op 05518) Matter of Ratliff v Town of Nelson 2024 NY Slip Op 05518 Decided on November 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

01/24/2017 DA 16-0359 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 16-0359 2017 MT 15N STAN RATLIFF, Individually and as Trustee of the RATLIFF TRUST, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GLORIA M. SCHLEINZ, SALLIE DRUCILLA ACORD, R

Last Term, in Kinsel v. Lindsey , we noted that Texas has never recognized a cause of action for intentional interference with inheritance but left open the question whether we should do so. 1 Today, to eliminate continuing confusion over the matter and resolve a split among the courts of appeals, we answer that question. Because ex

753 N.E.2d 38 (2001) Jason RATLIFF, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0010-CR-677. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 23, 2001. Rehearing Denied September 27, 2001. *39 Robert W. Hammerle, Joseph M. Cleary, Hammerle & Allen, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. <

741 N.E.2d 424 (2000) Scottie J. RATLIFF, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 43A03-9912-CR-446. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 28, 2000. *425 *426 *427 David C. Kolbe, Warsaw, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant. Kar

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) WD86413 v. ) ) OPINION FILED: ) June 3, 2025 AHMAD R. HERRING, )

KAREN R. BAKER, Judge. Christina and Robert Ratliff appeal from an order terminating their parental rights in D.R. (born September 5, 1999). We affirm the termination order. In July 2004, the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) opened a protective-services case on the Ratliff family based on environmental neglect and inadequate supervision of their five sons. The R

OPINION Scott K. Field, Justice T. Mark Anderson and Christine Anderson, as co-executors of the estate of Ted Anderson (collectively, the Andersons), appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding Richard T. Archer, David *176R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V. Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer (collectively, the Archers), $2,56

390 B.R. 607 (2008) WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Creditor-Appellant, v. Rose M. RATLIFF, Debtor-Appellee. Case No. 07-C-980. Bankruptcy No. 07-22653. Adversary No. 2007-02161. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. June 4, 2008. *608 William H. Ramsey, Wisconsin Dept. of Justice, Office of Attorney Genera

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________

HULL, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, defendants Jeffrey Green and Karen Hebble were each convicted of one count of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846; and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). As objects of the latter conspiracy, defendants Green and Heb

PER CURIAM: This suit concerns the effect of an attorney fee-shifting clause contained in an arbitration agreement. Karen Summers brought suit under various federal statutes including Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and state law tort claims against Dillard’s, her previous employer. She alleges that Di

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 5695578

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 8142557

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 7729364 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/6/2015

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 6528086

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 6726909 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 6711349 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS