Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Karen L. Matthews”
Pyle, Judge. Statement of the Case The Appellants/Plaintiffs, Robert K. Reinmiller Living Trust (“Reinmiller”) and Timothy and Paula Matthews (collectively, “the Matthews”), filed a complaint to challenge a legal survey completed on behalf of their neighbors, the Appellees/Defendants, Jeffrey L. and Karen Metschuleit (col
MURDOCK, Justice. The State Comptroller, Thomas L. White, Jr. (“the comptroller”), appeals from a preliminary injunction entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in response to an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought by Karen John, the Alabama Education Association (“the AEA”), Randy Hebson, and the Alabama State Employees Association (“the ASEA”). We reverse and remand.1
Matthews v. Bergdorfpublic domain
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. In 2006, the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (ODHS) recognized Jerry and Deidre Matthews as "adoptive parents" of the year for Northeast Oklahoma. But how quickly things changed. After years of reported abuse and neglect, the Delaware County District Court in April 2014 placed all nine children living in the Matthews' two bedroom, two bathroom trailer house
Karen Dent v. PRRC, Inc., d/b/a Price Rite.public domain
May 22, 2018 Supreme Court No. 2016-129-Appeal. (PC 13-5924) Karen Dent : v. : PRRC, Inc., d/b/a Price Rite. : NOTICE: This opinion is subje
Karen L. v. Physicians Health Services, Inc.public domain
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION DRONEY, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Physicians Health Services, Inc. (“PHS”) and Patricia Wilson-Coker, in her capacity as Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (“the Commissioner”), alleging violations of the federal Medicaid statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a
267 F.Supp.2d 184 (2003) KAREN L., by her mother JANE L., and Grisel Hernandez, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, and Patricia Wilson-Coker, in her official capacity, Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:99 CV 2244 C. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 9, 2003. *185 Shelley A. White, Sheldon V. Toubma
Matthews v. Statepublic domain
175 S.W.3d 110 (2005) Ecclesiastes MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. SC 86784. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. October 18, 2005. Rehearing Denied November 22, 2005. *112 Mark A. Grothoff, Office of Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., K
Matthews v. Wake Forest Universitypublic domain
* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms in part, and reverses in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. * * * * * * * * * * *
Matthews v. International House of Pancakes, Inc.public domain
597 F.Supp.2d 663 (2009) Bobby O. MATTHEWS, et al. v. INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 07-2869. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 23, 2009. *665 Douglas Daniel Brown, Brown & Duncan Legal Solutions, Hammond, LA, for Bobby O. Matthews. Nicholas Dale Doucet, Thomas E. Sch
In Re the Marriage of Matthewspublic domain
193 P.3d 466 (2008) In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Lisa L. MATTHEWS, Appellant, and Burke Lee Matthews, Appellee. No. 98,440. Court of Appeals of Kansas. September 26, 2008. *467 Karen Black, of Salina, for appellant. Roger D. Struble, of Blackwell, Blackwell, & Struble, Chtd., of Salina, for appellee. Before BUSE
JEROME DINELL * NO. 2024-CA-0227 MATTHEWS AND ELTON BARBER * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, * STATE OF LOUISIANA TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP, LLC, ******* BRANDSAFWAY SERVICES LLC, AND OIL MOP L.L.C. D/B/A OMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LLC APPEAL FROM 25TH JDC, PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES
State v. Matthewspublic domain
99 S.W.3d 494 (2003) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ecclesiastes M.D. MATTHEWS, Appellant. No. ED 80823. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. March 11, 2003. Rosalyn Koch, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: An insurance underwriter brought this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that it owed no coverage under a commercial property insurance policy. The insured counterclaimed for declaratory judgment, breach of the insurance contract, and violations of the Texas Insurance Code. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer on all c
In RE the Marriage of Diana L. Kimbro and Steven C. Kimbro Upon the Petition of Diana L. Kimbropublic domain
WIGGINS, Justice. On further review, a spouse asks us to determine the fairness of a property distribution and the denial of attorney fees. The court of appeals affirmed the district court decision by upholding the award of an equalization payment, but modified the decision by reducing the amount of the equalization payment from $45,468 to $5000. Additionally, the court of appeals
Karen Summers v. Dillard's Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: This suit concerns the effect of an attorney fee-shifting clause contained in an arbitration agreement. Karen Summers brought suit under various federal statutes including Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and state law tort claims against Dillard’s, her previous employer. She alleges that Di
Bureau of Prof'l Licensing v. Butlerpublic domain
Murphy, P.J. *462Respondent, Karen Lind Butler, M.D., appeals as of right an order issued by the Michigan Board of Medicine Disciplinary Subcommittee, which accepted and adopted the recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in a proposal for decision issued by a hearings examiner following an evidentiary hearing. Butler was
Matthews v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DOUGLAS MATTHEWS, § § No. 269, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID Nos. 2207004584,
TODD MATTHEWS v. ROSA MATTHEWSpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT TODD MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. ROSA MATTHEWS, Appellee. No. 4D19-2759 [July 9, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Mill
Karen L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Servicespublic domain
953 P.2d 871 (1998) KAREN L., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY AND YOUTH SERVICES, Deborah Wing, Faye Moore, Patricia Chambers Mitchell, Rita Hutchens, And Ray Johnson of Division of Family And Youth Services, The Office of Public Advocacy, Barbara Malchick And Shirley Perry of The Office Of Public Advocacy, Langdon Psychiatric Corp., Greg McCarthy, M.D., And Michael Rose, Ph.D., Appellee
Sims v. Carrington Mortgage Services, L.L.C.public domain
Chief Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court. To avoid foreclosure, homeowners and lenders often try to restructure underwater home mortgage loans that are in default by capitalizing past-due amounts as principal, lowering the interest rate, and reducing monthly payments, thereby easing the burden on the homeowners. But home equity loans are subject to the requirements of Article XVI, Section 50 of the