Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. Prior to December 13, 1977, the plaintiffs in these two related actions purchased convertible debentures issued by the defendant Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (“B & O”). At that time, 99.63% of the B & O’s shares were owned by defendant Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company, which in turn was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chessie Systems, Inc., the

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D February 26, 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R.

125 F.Supp.2d 1315 (2001) Karen Jones MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. WALLACE COMMUNITY COLLEGE-SELMA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-0802-RV-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 8, 2001. *1316 *1317 *1318

1 F.3d 1406 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,689, 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 435,RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8365 William F. LORENZ and Karen M. Lorenz, his wife; Victor A.Czerny; John Schmidt and Janice J. Schmidt, his wife;Marjorie Slapin; Thaddeus E. Drake and Celia Drake, hiswife; and Edith E. Berenkey; individually and on behalf ofa class of former debentureholders similarly situated,Appellants in 92-3667,v.<

OPINION ON REHEARING DAY, Justice. The State’s motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our November 21, 1996 opinion and judgment and substitute the following. INTRODUCTION This case presents the following issue: If a criminal defendant requests notice of the State’s intent to introduce extraneous offense evidence during the punishment phase of the trial, does the

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

943 S.W.2d 501 (1997) Charles Edward WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-95-436-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 13, 1997. Rehearing Overruled May 15, 1997. *502 Williams S. Harris, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney, Betty Marshall, Char

SUMMERS, Justice. Defendant Michael Penson was charged by bill of information with the May 28,1976 simple burglary of a structure known as Heaven to Eleven at 1134 Barrow Street, Houma, Louisiana, belonging to Ethel Lae-our and being leased to Deborah Pullaro. La.Rev.Stat. 14:62. He pled guilty, waived trial by jury and was found guilty in a bench trial on January 4, 1977. He was thereafter billed as a multiple offender an

174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

462 F.Supp. 535 (1978) W. J. USERY, Jr., Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BALTIMORE COUNTY. Civ. No. K-76-672. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 28, 1978. *536 *537 *538 Carin Ann Clauss, Sol.

PER CURIAM: Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) appeals the district court’s order certifying a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Union Pacific argues that the district court erred in certifying the class and in admitting the testimony of two expert witnesses. “The district court maintains great discretion in certifying and managing an action. We will reverse

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-199 Filed: January 23, 2026 PATRICK SNEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Steven M. Wald, with Michael J. Smith, Thomas S. Stewart, and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs. Emily A. Davis, Environment and Natural Resources Division,

77 B.R. 843 (1987) In re INDEPENDENT CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. In re UNIVERSAL CLEARING HOUSE COMPANY, a Trust, aka National Clearing House Company, a Trust, Debtor. In re ACCOUNTING SERVICES COMPANY, a Trust, Debtor. Robert D. MERRILL, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. David ABBOTT, et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. Nos. C-84-0927W, C-84-0928J and consolidated ca