Cases

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED August 29, 2025 BRANDON HICKS, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

DALIANIS, C.J. The petitioner, Karen Hildreth, a former employee of the department of health and human services, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) that she forfeited her right to continue to appeal a disciplinary action after retiring from State service. We reverse and remand. The facts are not in dispute. On December 9,2010, the petitioner received a letter of warning fo

PER CURIAM. We affirm a non-final order ordering appellant to pay child support and awarding primary residential responsibility • to appellee, which provided that the court would review the custody and visitation provisions in several months. This affir-mance is without prejudice to either party seeking review from the order finally determining these issues. KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ„ concur.

790 N.E.2d 5 (2003) 338 Ill. App.3d 751 273 Ill.Dec. 863 C. Michael WITTERS and Diane Witters, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Midwest Transit, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Hal D. HICKS, Defendant-Appellant (Midwest Transit, Inc., Defendant-Appellee; Fifth Third Bank, Indiana, Intervenor-Appellee). No. 5-02-0250. Appellate Court of Illinois,

859 S.W.2d 842 (1993) Norman G. HICKS, Respondent, v. Karen A. HICKS, Appellant. Norman Gale HICKS, Appellant, v. Karen Adele HICKS, Respondent. Nos. WD 46835, WD 46837. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 20, 1993. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 31, 1993. *844 Michae

JUSTICE HOPKINS delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, A. Jeffrey Hicks (Hicks), doing business as Financial Planning Advisors, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, appeals the circuit court’s order granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Airborne Express, Inc. (

ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) motion for security for costs pursuant to NRS 118.130(1). ECF No. 9. This case involves a homeowners association’s (“HOA”) non-judicial foreclosure of real property in Sparks, Nevada. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank is the beneficiary of the subject property’s deed o

Riley, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I sign Justice Boyle’s dissenting opinion in People v Bellew. I write separately to express my agreement with the result of the lead opinion in People v Hicks. On these facts, defendant Hicks did not consent to a mistrial. Because there existed a manifest necessity to

647 N.E.2d 257 (1995) 164 Ill.2d 218 207 Ill.Dec. 295 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Tazell HICKS, Appellant. No. 76525. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 26, 1995. *258 Rita A. Fry, Public Defender, and Suzanne A. Isaacson and Karen E. Tietz, Asst. Public Defend

201 Mich. App. 197 (1993) 506 N.W.2d 269 PEOPLE v. HICKS Docket No. 149026. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted May 5, 1993, at Detroit. Decided August 16, 1993, at 9:25 A.M. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, and Timothy A. Bau

KAREN R. BAKER, Associate Justice hOn July 2, 2015, Arthur Hicks, Jr., was convicted of capital murder by an Arkansas County jury. Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. section 5-10-101(c)(l)(B)(2)(Repl. 2013), the parties agreed to allow the circuit court to sentence Hicks. The circuit court sentenced Hicks to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole in 28 years and an additional seven-years

Per Curiam: Kevin Hicks appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

FINAL JUDGMENT Karen S. Jennemann, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding came on for trial on April 2, 2015, on the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, Martha Walls, seeking to determine dischargeability of certain debts of the Debtor/Defendant, Gary Robert Hick's, under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(5) and 523(a)(15). Consistent with the findings of fact and conclusions of law ent

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CARLOS CRUZ, Appellant, v. KAREN MATOS, Appellee. No. 4D22-700 [February 8, 2023] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael C. H

108 Cal.Rptr.2d 10 (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 496 Richard B. HICKS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. E.T. LEGG & ASSOCIATES et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D034398. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. May 25, 2001. Review Denied August 8, 2001. *13 George McGill, Car

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0182p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JOSEPH FISCHER; FISCHER FOR SUPREME COURT │ COMMITTEE; ROBERT A. WIN

Judge Karen King Mitchell writes a separate concurring opinion. Karen King Mitchell, Judge While I agree with the majority that reversal is unwarranted, I write separately to note that, because jurisdiction is not an element of the crime with which Hicks was charged, the State was not required to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, like venue, jurisdiction may be inferred from all the evidence.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1928 CLINTON A. KRISLOV and MICHAEL POWERS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KAREN A. YARBROUGH, Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United S

11/02/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 19, 2022 KAREN THOMAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 118434 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge _____________________

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Karen S. Jennemann, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff, Martha Walls, is the former wife of the Debtor and Defendant, Gary Hicks. Plaintiff contends that the monies awarded to her under their Final Judgement and Decree of Divorce1 (the “Divorce Decree”) are not dischargeable in the Defendant’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy