Cases

Court of Criminal Appeals Abel Acosta, Clerk P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 RE: State of Texas V. Tony Kareem Whitfield No. 1277164-A ’ Dear Clerk, 32 .8&§ ~O/ January-§l, 2015 Enclosed you will find Applicant's Traverse To The States Answer. Please file-stamp said instrument and bring it to the attention of the court in your usual fashion. Thank you for your time and cooperation. Respectfully Submitted: O" ' ' v <U nl ‘ Tony Kareem Whitfield No. 1744769 Coffiel

Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; RCFC 52.1; Disability Retirement Pay Claim Under 10 U.S.C. § 1201 OPINION HEWITT, Chief Judge Kareem R. Rock (plaintiff or Mr. Rock), a Gulf War veteran with more than thirteen years of service in the United States Navy (Navy), brings this suit alleging that he “has been de

*549In an adoption proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, and two related custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 and Domestic Relations Law § 72, (1) the biological father, Kareem W., appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), dated February 9, 2009, which, upon a decision of the same court dated February 2, 2009, mad

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 2, 2014 (People v Cunningham, 119 AD3d 601 [2014]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 22, 2010. Ordered that the application is denied.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered December 22, 2010, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his conten

[J-21-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 808 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Order dated May : 31, 2023, in th

MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Kareem Tillman brings this employment discrimination action against Defendant Luray’s Travel (“Lu-ray”) for violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (,See Compl. (Dkt.

659 F.Supp.2d 577 (2009) Kareem S. PERRY, Plaintiff, v. Paul STEPHENS, s/h/a P. Stephen, Corrections Officer, Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 3586. United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 23, 2009. *579 Kareem S. Perry, Pine City, NY, pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York, by Donald Nowve

JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS *529Relator/defendant seeks review of the trial court's December 20, 2017 ruling that overruled the defense's written objection to the State's discovery redaction. For the following reasons, we grant defendant's writ and remand this matter to the trial court to conduct an ex parte proceeding with the State

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated March 14, 2011, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, determined that his consent to the subject adoption was not required, and transferred the rights of custody and guardianship of the subject child t

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Alan D. Marras, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, in effect, to vacate an order in an underlying case entitled People v Lee, Indictment No. 5957/03, in the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 2, 2008, denying the petitioner’s motion, inter alia, to be resentenced, and to grant the motion, and application by the petitioner for poor person

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated March 14, 2011, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, determined that his consent to the subject adoption was not required, and transferred the rights of custody and guardianship of the subject child t

The defendant’s affidavit, in which he stated that he lived in an apartment with his fiancee, established that the defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the apartment and, thus, had standing to challenge the search of the apartment and the seizure of a gun (see Minnesota v Carter, 525 US 83, 88-89 [1998]; People v Adams, 244 AD2d 897, 898 [1997]). Moreover, in light of the hearing court’s particular credibility findings as

The defendant’s affidavit, in which he stated that he lived in an apartment with his fiancee, established that the defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the apartment and, thus, had standing to challenge the search of the apartment and the seizure of a gun (see Minnesota v Carter, 525 US 83, 88-89 [1998]; People v Adams, 244 AD2d 897, 898 [1997]). Moreover, in light of the hearing court’s particular credibility findings as

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-853 (JDB) LONNIE G. BUNCH, III, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Com

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Daniel Foster B. appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated March 5, 2008, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found that he neglected Carlena B. and, in effect, that he derivatively neglected Damien M., and, among other things, prohibited him from any contact with Carlena B. until he completed substance abu

FILED Sep 27 2023, 8:43 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J., at trial; Palmieri, J., at sentencing), rendered April 23, 2010, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant was accused of killing Kareem Sapp. At trial, after t

18 A.3d 91 (2011) 198 Md. App. 421 Kareem GRANT v. Stacy G. KAHN, et al. No. 886, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 27, 2011. *93 Matthew G. Summers (Robert A. Scott, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for appellant. David W. H

On appeal, the defendant contends that he was denied the right to a speedy trial under article III of CPL 580.20 because the People failed to bring him to trial within 180 days after his request for a final disposition of the indictment had been delivered to the appropriate court and prosecuting officer (see CPL 580.20, art III [a]). Although the defendant contends on appeal that the People should be charged with 206 days of delay, he concedes th