⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kamber v. United States”

Supreme Court of the United States · 1972-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 407 U.S. 910; 92 S. Ct. 2434
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-1867 (JDB) RICHARD MAY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") against Richard May alleging
Dowling v. Kamberpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 1007; 112 S. Ct. 643
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Dowling v. Kamberpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 1007
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 458 F.2d 918
SWYGERT, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a conviction following a jury verdict of guilty on the charge that defendant Kamber “willfully and knowingly was a party to the making of a false statement [to selective service] bearing upon his classification for service in the Armed Forces of the United States” in violation of 50 U.S.
State v. Kamberpublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007-08-17 · Published · cited 14× · 737 N.W.2d 297; 2007 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 102; 2007 WL 2332467
737 N.W.2d 297 (2007) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. JoAnn Minnie KAMBER, Appellant. No. 05-1868. Supreme Court of Iowa. August 17, 2007. Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, Nan Jennisch and Dennis D. Hendrickson, Assistant State Appellate Defenders, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Martha E. Boesen, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sar
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007-08-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 76 / 05-1868 Filed August 17, 2007 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JOANN MINNIE KAMBER, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________________ On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, John D. Lloyd, Judge. Defendant seeks further review of court of appeals decision affirmi
Dowling v. Kamberpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991-05-29 · Published · cited 0× · 935 F.2d 1294; 1991 WL 96087
935 F.2d 1294 Dowlingv.Kamber*** NO. 89-6261 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. MAY 29, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 851
PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge In December 2004, the defendant was indicted in a three-count indictment; one of those three counts charged him with possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base. Dkt. No. 1. About a month later, the government filed an information under 21 U.S.C. § 851, giving notice
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 379 F. Supp. 3d 646
ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE INTRODUCTION A jury convicted Defendant Boulding of two crack cocaine offenses in October of 2008. It found a conspiracy offense involving at least 50 grams of crack, and a possession with intent to distribute offense involving at least 5 grams of crack. The government had a Section 851 Notice on file reporting two prior felony drug offense convict
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 5× · 648 F. Supp. 2d 70; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77959; 2009 WL 2634876
648 F.Supp.2d 70 (2009) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Richard MAY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1867 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 28, 2009. *73 Richard Edward Simpson, Vincente Leon Martinez, U.S. Securities & Exchange
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 116 F.3d 468; 1997 WL 309496; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 15955
116 F.3d 468 Mohamoud M. Ismailv.Trenton State College, Harold W. Eickhoff, Rick Kamber,Claire Hardgrove, Howard Robboy, Eugenia Shanklin,Joanne Lee NO. 96-5199 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. May 07, 1997 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.93-2336 (CSF) 1
Kamber v. Urianpublic domain
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · 1950-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 69 Pa. D. & C. 638; 1950 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 497
Flood, J., Plaintiff seeks to take the depositions of defendant who, although domiciled in Philadelphia, is now in the Navy and stationed outside Pennsylvania. This is not permitted under our procedure. The Federal rules have not yet been adopted by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as procedural rules. Under our practice the type of discovery which plaintiff here seeks can be allowed, if at all, only by bill of discovery. <
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933-08-01 · Published · cited 8× · 66 F.2d 612; 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2733
66 F.2d 612 (1933) UNITED STATES v. LESSER et al. No. 487. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. August 1, 1933. Morris Kamber, of New York City (Otho S. Bowling, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Henry Lesser. Anthony P. Savarese, of Jamaica, L. I. N. Y., for appellant Forrest E. James. Alfred D. Van Buren, of New York City, for appella
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930-12-05 · Published · cited 2× · 45 F.2d 690; 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3718
MANTON, Circuit Judge. On July 30, 1929, a fire broke out at 42 Yerona street. Brooklyn, N. Y., at about 10:45 a. m. When the firemen responded to the call, it was discovered that the premises were used for manufacturing liquor. Pipes ran from the building through the walls into adjoining premises, where empty cans and a tank containing fluid, drums of lacquer, and lacquer thinner were found. Samples were taken which showed
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925-11-20 · Published · cited 42× · 9 F.2d 522; 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412
9 F.2d 522 (1925) ROMANO et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 77. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 20, 1925. *523 Wallace E. J. Collins, of Jamaica, N. Y., and Morris Kamber, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Otho S. Bowling and Vine H. Smith, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error. Ralph C. Greene, U. S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925-06-03 · Published · cited 4× · 7 F.2d 881; 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3638
HAND, Circuit Judge. Sehechter was a druggist in Richmond Ilill, Long Island. He had had a license to possess and sell whisky at another place, but on December 8, 1923, he had just moved to the opposite corner of the street, and the night in question was that on which ho opened his new shop. A prohibition agent entered in company with a woman at 11 p. m., made a purchase of candy, and then stepped up to the clerk behind the cou
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923-03-05 · Published · cited 11× · 289 F. 424; 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 1975
HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1] The “amended assignment of errors” is open to all the objections enumerated in Fraina v. United States, 255 Fed. 28, 30, 166 C. C. A. 356. It is therefore disregarded, as was a similar document in Schonfeld v. United States (C. C. A.) 277 Fed. 934, 939. The errors assigned in accordance with rule at the time of taking writ of error do not present in p
District Court, E.D. New York · 1922-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 278 F. 559; 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 921
CHATFIFFD, District Judge. Demurrer to indictment charging conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States. [1-3] The indictment alleges a number of overt acts, which may or may not have been crimes in themselves; but this has no bearing upon the validity of the indictment. A conspiracy indictment must be sufficient in its statement of the charge of conspiracy, independent
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922-03-27 · Published · cited 13× · 282 F. 575; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2671
MANTON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in error were charged in an information with an offense in that on or about the 22d of December, 1920, within the jurisdiction of the Eastern district, they did “unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly manufacture and possess for sale and for some time prior thereto sell a certain machine, contrivance, or still designated or intended for use in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquors,”