Cases

Filed 9/30/21 Certified for Publication 10/28/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DAVID ZAMORA, H044008 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 12CV233674) v. SECURITY INDUSTRY

PER CURIAM. Lynne Sienkiewicz applied for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits in 1999, claiming that a host of ailments had rendered her disabled since 1993. At a hear *800 ing in February 2001, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that Sienkiewicz

654 F.Supp. 748 (1986) Jurellene JORMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. No. 77 C 581. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. September 11, 1986. *749 F. Willis Caruso, Isham Lincoln & Beale and Alexander Polikoff, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs. Richard C. Stearns and Eliz

J. W. Fitzgerald, J. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the circuit court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10), dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief, and denying plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, plaintiffs contend the trial judge erred in ruling that 1987 PA 59, MCL 400.109a; MSA 16.490(19a), did not violate their right

*589ORDER . An administrative law judge denied John Hoy’s disability claims, and the district court affirmed that decision. Hoy appeals. We affirm the judgment of the district court. Hoy, now 55 years old, has an employment history consisting mostly of jobs involving heavy labor — in a steel mill, in a fish warehouse, as a day laborer — and one stint as an unarmed secur

582 F.3d 672 (2009) Carolyn MYLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-2908. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 22, 2009. Decided September 9, 2009. *674 Barry A. Schultz (argued), Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.<

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge. Claimant Wanda Brent (“Claimant”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. *943§ 405(g), seeking reversal and remand of the decision by Defendant Michael J. As-true, Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”), denying Claimant’s application for Dis

ORDER Lynne Sienkiewicz applied for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits in 1999, claiming that a host of ailments had rendered her disabled since 1998. At a hearing in February 2001, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that Sienkiewicz was not disabled. The Appeals Council declined review and the district court affirmed. Sienkiewicz now appeals. Because the ALJ’s decision is supporte

433 F.Supp.2d 915 (2006) Frank L. GREENWOOD, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 05 C 5707. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 18, 2006. *916 *917 Frederick J. Daley, Jr., Daley, Debofsky & Bryant, Chicago, Coun

In the United States Court of Federal Claims TIMMY LYNN DUKE, Plaintiff, v. No. 24-581T (Filed October 25, 2024) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Timmy Lynn Duke, Iowa Park, TX, pro se. Anthony M. Cognasi, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 16, 2024 Decided July 18, 2025 No. 24-5076 ADAM STEELE AND KRYSTAL COMER, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-cv-00918)

751 F.Supp.2d 991 (2010) Dominick CIRELLI, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 09 C 3862. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 18, 2010. *994 Erwin Cohn, Cohn & Cohn, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Michele Marion Fox, AUSA-SSA, United States A

633 F.Supp.2d 618 (2009) Leroy CRAWFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 08 C 4414. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 9, 2009. *624 Barry A. Schultz, The Law Offices of Barry A. Schultz, P.C., Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff. Pierre Talbert

LEWIS, J. Appellants, the Department of Revenue (“DOR”) and Mark Cole Cruickshank, appeal a final order entered by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), arguing that the ALJ erred by determining that the Division of Administrative Hearings (“DOAH”) lacked subject matter jurisdiction to establish the child support obligation of Laura Beth Graczyk (“Appellee”) because DOAH had juri

776 F.Supp.2d 616 (2011) Lucia NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 09-C-7284. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 2, 2011. *618 Barry Alan Schultz, Law Offices of Barry Schultz, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff. Harpreet Kaur Chahal, AUSA

667 F.Supp.2d 834 (2009) Shacarlia B. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 08 C 6539. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 30, 2009. *835 Barry Alan Schultz, Law Offices of Barry Schultz, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff. Donald R. Lorenzen,

[Cite as Stat ex rel. Sours v. MGQ, Inc., 2023-Ohio-4289.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Larry Sours, : Relator, : No. 22AP-31 v. : (

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 21-1729 & 21-3325 ____________ ARCKANGE SAINT FORD, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigrat

PER CURIAM: * This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Long Term Disability Program (“the Program”). The district court correctly held that the plan administrator’s decision to deny disability payments to Angel Dix was not an abuse of discretion. However, because the district court named the incorrect defendant (“Blue

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 21-1729 & 21-3325 ____________ ARCKANGE SAINT FORD, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Im