⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “KYARA TATE”

Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-0753 Filed March 20, 2019 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DEVARIS MARQUIS PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Bradley M. McCall, Judge. The defendant appeals from his convictions for attempted murder, intimidation with a dange
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-07-23 · Published · cited 3× · 226 Conn. App. 752
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
State v. Youngpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-09-08 · Published · cited 16× · 2022 Ohio 3132
[Cite as State v. Young, 2022-Ohio-3132.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant, : No. 110973 v. : KIARAN YOUNG,
In re James O., Jr.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o
In re Noelia M.public domain
Connecticut Superior Court · 2014-08-19 · Published · cited 0× · 53 Conn. Supp. 402; 121 A.3d 1; 2014 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3261
STEVENS, J. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On October 17,2013, the Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF) filed petitions to terminate the parental rights of the mother, R. M., and the three fathers of the children, Noelia, Yanilie and Ivelia. These petitions allege that parental rights should be terminated on grounds of abandonment, failure to rehabilitate, and no ongoing parent-child relation
In re Omar I.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech