Cases

259 Wis.2d 357 (2002) 2003 WI App 9 656 N.W.2d 752 KW HOLDINGS, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF WINDSOR, a body corporate and politic, Town of Windsor Town Board, the governing body of the Town of Windsor, Town of Windsor Plan Commission, a commission created by the Town of Windsor, and Cheryl Theis, Town of Windsor Clerk-Treasurer, Defendants-Respondents.

622 F.Supp.2d 1357 (2009) The CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; KW Holding One, LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; the Grand Preserve at Naples LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; and Marcy Kravit, Defendants. Case No. 09-60202-CV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida.</

06/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 17, 2022 Session WILSON BANK & TRUST ET AL. v. CONSOLIDATED UTILITY DISTRICT OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 70947 Bonita Jo Atwood, Judge ___

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 49184 / 49522 GERINGER CAPITAL, dba GERINGER ) CAPITAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) Boise, February 2023 Term v. ) ) Opinion filed: May 17, 202

***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000640 14-DEC-2017 10:05 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

138 Nev., Advance Opinion Ug IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA AARON LEIGH-PINK; AND TANA | No. 82572 EMERSON, . Appellants, FILED © RIO PROPERTIES, LLC, | - S Respondent. JUN 30 2022 | EL in Bee By IEF SoBUTY CLERK Certified question under NRAP 5 concerning the scope of damages under common-law fraudulent concealment and _ statutory consumer fraud claims. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Ronald M. Gould and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges, and Brian M. Cogan,

APPEALS COURT SUNPIN ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, & another[1] vs. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF PETERSHAM Docket: 24-P-18 Dates: January 14, 2025. – July 9, 2025

MCDONALD, J.: **170In 2015, Oien Family Investments, LLC (OFI) brought this action against Piedmont Municipal Power Agency (Piedmont), **171seeking to permanently enjoin Piedmont from condemning a portion of its 116-acre property in Newberry County (the Pr

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SERGIO L. RAMIREZ, No. 17-17244 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC TRANSUNION LLC, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge,

CARROLL, J. ¶ 1. Stowe Cady Hill Solar (Cady Hill) applied to the Public Utility Commission 1 for a certificate of public good to construct a group net-metered solar array in the Town of Stowe. The Commission dismissed Cady Hill's application after finding that the application was incomplete because two adjoining landowners wer

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2021 VT 67

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1826 T Filed: October 8, 2021 Re-issued: November 2, 20211 ) DESERT SUNLIGHT 250, LLC and DESERT ) SUNLIGHT 300, LLC, )

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs Expert Disclosures and Written Reports pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(2)(B). (Paper No. 46). The briefing is complete. No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion to compel.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2025 VT 65

MEMORANDUM SHERIDAN, District Judge. This non-jury case was tried before the Court over thirteen separate days in April and May, 2013. After trial, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as well as briefs, and thereafter, summations were heard. The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and having deliberated over the facts and the law, submits this memorandum as

Opinion STREETER, J. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves a long-running dispute between Panoche Energy Center, LLC (Panoche), a producer of electricity, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), a utility that purchases electricity from Panoche, over which of them should bear the costs of complying with a legislatively mandated

MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, Chief Judge. This case is before the court on defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. 38)1. Upon consideration of the record, the submissions of the parties, the arguments of counsel, and the relevant law, the court is of the opinion that defendants’ Motion is due to be granted

ACCEPTED 03-15-00011-CV 4962340 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, T

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00053-CV ___________________________ J. CURT LUCAS AND INVENIAS PARTNERS LLC, Appellants V. CY

ACCEPTED 12-15-00254-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS