Cases

127 F.3d 1095 Steven M. Kramerv.George Barton; Steven M. Kramer v. George Barton NOS. 96-5716, 96-5737 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Aug 14, 1997 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.9305335 1 Affirmed.

ORDER PER CURIAM Antoine D. Barton (Appellant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of first-degree murder arid armed criminal action. On appeal, Appellant asserts the trial court erred by .admitting jailhouse phone recordings of a State witness for two reasons: (1) the State committed a discovery violation by giving

ORDER PER CURIAM Amber Barton (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate a judgment entered against her on September 16, 2010. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciti

778 F.Supp.2d 1320 (2011) SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth R. KRAMER, et al., Defendants. Case No. 8:09-cv-455-T-23TBM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 1, 2011. *1321 Amie Riggle Berlin, Drew Douglas Panahi, James Michael Carlson, Securities & Exchange Commission, Mia

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00188-CR ___________________________ EX PARTE CHARLES BARTON On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 8 Tarrant County, Texas

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00188-CR ___________________________ EX PARTE CHARLES BARTON On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 8 Tarrant County, Texas

/ Fl LE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 89390-0 Respondent, v. ENBANC PETER RICHARD BARTON, Filed July 31, 2014 Petitioner. STEPHENS, J.-This case centers on article I, section 20 of the Washington State Constitutio

JONES, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment awarding $4,923 in liquidation of her one-half of the community interest in her former husband’s claim based upon injuries received while at work. We affirm. During his marriage to plaintiff defendant was injured while on the job. Plaintiff and defendant subsequently obtained a judicial separation while defendant’s suit against his employer was pending. D

¶1 This case centers on article I, section 20 of the Washington State Constitution and its mandate that criminal defendants “shall be bailable by sufficient sureties.” Peter Barton’s bail was set at $500,000; invoking Criminal Rule (CrR) 3.2(b)(4), the trial court ordered that Barton post 10 percent of that amount with the registry of the court in cash or other security. Barton claims this order violates his guaranty to bail by sufficient sureties.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE KEITH JACKSON, ) No. ED103370 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. )

Kennedy, J. Steve R. Aubin filed a legal malpractice action against Lisa Kay Barton, an attorney who represented him in the action dissolving his marriage to Tanja Kitchel, claiming that Barton’s representation at a settlement conference fell below the standard of care required of an attorney representing a grantee of stock options in a marital dissolution action in the state of Washington. Aubin contended that, but for h

98 P.3d 126 (2004) Steve R. AUBIN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Lisa Kay BARTON and John Doe Barton, husband and wife, and the marital community comprised thereof; and O'Brien & Associates, Inc., P.S., a Washington Professional Services Corporation, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. No. 52069-5-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. September 27, 2004.

967 A.2d 482 (2009) 291 Conn. 84 Peter BARTON v. CITY OF BRISTOL et al. No. 17953. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued December 2, 2008. Decided April 14, 2009. *483 Michelle N. Holmes, for the appellant (plaintiff). *484 Diana Garfield, Hartfor

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ELIZABETH S. STONG, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction Before the Court is the motion of the Chapter 7 Trustee Debra Kramer, for sanctions against Karamvir Dahiya, Esq. and Dahiya Law Offices, LLC (together, “Dahiya”), in an adversary proceeding brought in connection with the bankruptcy case of Shahara Khan. The Trust

Judgment reversed in part, without costs, and matter remanded to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, with directions to enter judgment in favor of the city on its cross claim against defendant Blumenson for indemnity. Since defendant Blumenson constructed the faulty sidewalk and the city had only constructive notice of the defective condition, the two may not be said to be in pari delicto so as to prevent the application of the active and passive ne

FAGG, Circuit Judge. McMartin Industries, Inc. failed to pay over to the government federal income and social security taxes withheld from employees’ wages for parts of 1984 and 1985. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed John R. Barton, the corporation’s executive vice president and secretary, for these unpaid taxes under 26 U.S.C. § 6672, which permits the IRS to collect unpaid taxes from persons responsible for a cor

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a departure sentence. Appellant was originally sentenced to two years of community control. He violated a condition of the sentence and pleaded guilty to the violation. When sentenced for the violation the judge departed from the recommended guidelines sentence. The reasons given were that appellant had been charged with crimes in another county and thus was “un

128 F.Supp.2d 982 (2001) Chip BARTON, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Jerry Ferguson, Robert Waters, Ken Phillips, Karen Partain, Lou Delaware, and John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 399CV722BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. January 18, 2001. *983 Jeffrey L. Elli

248 Pa. Superior Ct. 278 (1977) 375 A.2d 96 Sumner R. BARTON, Appellant, v. Betty M. BARTON. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 16, 1977. Decided June 29, 1977. *279 Craig W. Bremer, Harrisburg, with him Thomas A. Beckley, Harrisburg, for appellant. Charles J. DeHart, III, Harrisburg, with

DeBRULER, Justice. This proceeding was commenced in the White Cireuit Court on September 28, 1988, when the White County Auditor, Commissioners, and County Council filed a petition for a trial on the merits of a mandate order pursuant to Ind.R.Tr.P. 60.5. The order which was the subject of the petition was made by the Honorable Karl Overbeck, Judge of the White Circuit Court and it required the petitioners to take the steps