Cases

325 S.W.3d 290 (2010) HAZARD COAL CORPORATION; Whitaker Coal Corporation; Perry County Coal Corporation; Locust Grove, Inc.; and TECO Coal Corporation, Appellants, v. Larry J. KNIGHT and Eileen Knight, and, Larry E. Knight and Mary Knight, Appellees. No. 2008-SC-000735-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. September 23, 2010. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2010.

20 Cal.Rptr.3d 780 (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1278 Leesa BUNCH, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOFFINGER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants, Cross-Defendants and Appellants; McMasker Enterprises, Inc., Cross-Complainant and Respondent. No. C040177. Court of Appeal, Third District. November 8, 2004. Rehearing Denied Decembe

466 S.E.2d 226 (1995) 219 Ga. App. 527 PAKWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al. v. JOHN GALT ASSOCIATES et al. No. A95A1503. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 4, 1995. Reconsideration Denied December 19, 1995. Certiorari Denied April 1, 1996. *227 Holland & Knight, Gregory

377 So.2d 973 (1979) Diane PIKE, Cynthia Pike, Robert Pike, Jr., and Jonathan Pike, Appellants, v. NATIONAL FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Etc., Appellee. No. 78-2157. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 23, 1979. Rehearing Denied November 28, 1979. *974 Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart,

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

Memorandum and Order RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the following motions: 1) SUPPLYONE’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ First Claim for Relief (Quasi-Contract Claim) (Doc. 20); 2) SUPPLY-ONE’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Third (Fraud) and Fourth (Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices) Claims for Relief (Doc. 26);

ACCEPTED 13-14-00428-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 5/15/2015 4:46:42 PM

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0011p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC.; ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES │ AD

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TALKDESK, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. N23C-08-005 MAA CCLD ) v. ) ) DM TRANS, LLC d/b/a ARRIVE ) LOGISTICS, ) )

440 B.R. 103 (2009) In re RAMREDDY, INC., Debtor(s). No. 09-15283 ELF. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 9, 2009. *105 Robert J. Murtaugh, Ron Lee Woodman, The Chartwell Law Offices, LLP, Eagleville, PA, for Debtor(s). MEMORANDUM ERIC L. FRANK, Bankruptcy Judge. I.

[Cite as Urban Partnership Bank v. Mosezit Academy, Inc., 2014-Ohio-3721.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100712 URBAN PARTNERSHIP BANK PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 637 DBI, Inc., f/k/a Duck Boo International Co., Ltd. ("DBI"), a defendant in an action pending in the Mobile Circuit Court, petitioned in a prior proceeding for a writ of mandamus asking this Court to direct the trial court to dismiss the claims against it on the basis that the trial court lacks personal jurisd

(2007) Saro DAGHLIAN on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DEVRY UNIVERSITY, INC., Devry Inc., and Does 1 through and including 100, Defendants. No. CV 06-994 MMM (PJWx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 10, 2007. Order Denying Reconsideration, February 19, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

LYONS, Justice. DBI, Inc., f/k/a Duck Boo International Co., Ltd. (“DBI”), a defendant in an action pending in the Mobile Circuit Court, petitioned in a prior proceeding for a writ of mandamus asking this Court to direct the trial court to dismiss the claims against it on the basis that the trial court lacks personal jurisdiction over DBI. We concluded that we could not satisfactorily address the issue presented at that time w

ORDER AFTER TRIAL ON DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT WENDY L. HAGENAU, Bankruptcy Judge. [T]he jealousy, the greed is the unraveling It’s the unraveling And it undoes all the joy that could be1 This is a story of three women whose jealousy and greed not only unraveled “Joy” (the Debtor), but unraveled what was and coul

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 902 The petitioner, Duck Boo International Company, Ltd., a manufacturer of seat belts for motor vehicles, is a defendant in an action pending in the Mobile Circuit Court. Kia Motors America, Inc., and Kia Motors Corporation (collectively referred to as "Kia Motors"), are also defendants in that action. Tiffany

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

110 Cal.Rptr.2d 370 (2001) 26 Cal.4th 465 28 P.3d 116 Marilyn MERRILL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NAVEGAR, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. S083466. Supreme Court of California. August 6, 2001. *373 Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, Dennis A. Henigan, Brian J. Siebel

369 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) FMC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-cv-01553. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 16, 2005. *540 *541 *542 Abbe F. Fletman, Kelly Dobbs Bunting, Wolf, Block, Schorr

532 U.S. 661 (2001) PGA TOUR, INC. v. MARTIN No. 00-24. United States Supreme Court. Argued January 17, 2001. Decided May 29, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *662 *663 *664 Stevens, J., delivered