Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALISHEA KINGDOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-691-RCL DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiffs in this dispute are inmates in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) who have been medically diagnosed with gender dysphoria

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALISHEA KINGDOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-691-RCL DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs in this dispute are inmates in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) who have been medically diagnosed with gender dysphori

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 26-5181 September Term, 2025 1:25-cv-00691-RCL Filed On: June 17, 2026 Alishea Sophia Kingdom, Reg. No. 13131-089, et al., Appellees v.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 25-807 ARIZONA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE D.C. No. OF OREGON; DELMY FRANCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DAVID KEANU SAI, Ph.D., pro se ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-1500 (TSC)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 28, 2024 Decided August 16, 2024 No. 23-7031 NEXTERA ENERGY GLOBAL HOLDINGS B.V. AND NEXTERA ENERGY SPAIN HOLDINGS B.V., APPELLEES v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbi

On March 23, 2018, Defendants Donald J. Trump ("President Trump"), in his official capacity as President of the United States; James N. Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; Joseph F. Dunford, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Richard V. Spencer, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy; Ryan D. McCarthy, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Army; Heather A. Wilson, in her offi

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1169 O. DOE; BRAZILIAN WORKER CENTER; LA COLABORATIVA, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; US DEPARTMENT OF STATE; MARCO RUBIO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in his official capacity as

TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge Before the court is David Keanu Sai's pro se Petition against Donald J. Trump, *71President of the United States of America; Philip S. Davidson, Commander of the Indo-Pacific Command of the United States Navy; and David Ige, Governor of the State of Hawaii. Sai describes himself as the "Chai

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) AHMAD MUAFFAQ ZAIDAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 17-581 (RMC) DONALD J. TRUMP,

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Ahmad Muaffaq Zaidan and Bilal Abdul Kareem are journalists who specialize in reporting on terrorism and conflict in the Middle East. Mr. Zaidan learned his name was included on a list of suspected terrorists and Mr. Kareem has been the victim or near victim of at least five aerial bombings while in Syria. Based on this information, the Plaintiffs believe their names are o

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 28, 2024 Decided August 16, 2024 No. 23-7031 NEXTERA ENERGY GLOBAL HOLDINGS B.V. AND NEXTERA ENERGY SPAIN HOLDINGS B.V., APPELLEES v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbi

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: *362 The District of Columbia and the State of Maryland commenced this action against Donald J. Trump in his official *363 capacity as President of the United State

PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In a previous Opinion1 the Court held that Plaintiffs, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, have standing to challenge actions of President Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity,2 that they believe violate the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.3 <

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1560 Doc: 133 Filed: 07/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 86 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1560 BADAR KHAN SURI, Petitioner - Appellee, v. DONALD TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued July 12, 2019 Decided October 11, 2019 No. 19-5142 DONALD J. TRUMP, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. MAZARS USA, LLP AND COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit