⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “KING v. 3M COMPANY”

District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. Supp. 3d 1153; 83 ERC (BNA) 2356; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27435; 2017 WL 784991
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider
United States Tax Court · 2023-02-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT KATHERINE O’HAVER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD86040 ) 3M COMPANY, ) Opinion filed: June 18, 2024 ) Respondent. ) APPEAL
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 9× · 814 N.W.2d 33; 2012 WL 987303; 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 23
OPINION LARKIN, Judge. Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of its claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Because the dismissal was based on the erroneous conclusion that a party may not maintain both a claim for breach of contract and a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on the same conduct, and because appellant st
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008-05-29 · Published · cited 1× · 749 N.W.2d 797; 2008 Minn. LEXIS 279; 2008 WL 2200105
749 N.W.2d 797 (2008) In re CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and Continental Insurance Company, Petitioners. Continental Casualty Company, et al., Appellants, v. 3M Company, Respondent, ACE Bermuda Insurance, Ltd., et al., Defendants, Transamerica Premier Insurance Company, n/k/a Fairmont Premier Insurance, Respondent. No. A07-784. Supreme Court of Minnesota. May 29, 20
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2010-09-29 · Published · cited 2× · 746 F. Supp. 2d 1216; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103000; 2010 WL 3835131
746 F.Supp.2d 1216 (2010) EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Solutia, Inc., and Fire Ram International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 3:09cv361/MCR/MD. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. September 29, 2010. *1217 James Martin Corrigan, James M
Superior Court of Delaware · 2017-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3M COMPANY, INC. et al., IN RE; ASBESToS LITIGATloN= ) ) LARRY CECIL STURGILL and ) JILL STURGILL, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. NO. N15C-12-188 ASB ) v- ) ) ) ) ) Defendants. Submitted: October 5, 2017 Decided: Decemberl 1, 2017 Upon Defendant Union Carbide Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment GRANTED. ORDER David W. deBruin, Esquire, The deBruin Firm LLC, 1201 North Orange Street, Suite 500, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attorney for Plaintiffs, Larry
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006-03-24 · Published · cited 6× · 423 F. Supp. 2d 958; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17111; 2006 WL 763210
423 F.Supp.2d 958 (2006) 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP, INC., Central Products Company, and Intertape Polymer Corporation, Defendants. No. Civ. 03-2651JRTFLN. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 24, 2006. *959 *960 Daniel J. Brown and Thomas W. Tinkham, Dorsey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0256p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY C-8 │ PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATI
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-09-16 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3519 ___________ * 3M Company, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v.
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 957 F. Supp. 2d 680; 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 17; 2013 WL 3730682; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97679
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANTHONY J. TRENGA, District Judge. Plaintiff Cecil D.B. King, Jr. and his siblings (“Plaintiffs”) seek payment with respect to five Certificates of Deposit (“CDs”) they obtained from their father’s estate. Each CD is dated July 27, 1976, in the face amount of $1,000,000, issued by the First National Bank of Chicago (“FNBC”), and made payable to “Bearer” (“Bearer CDs”). In July 1
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01651-SCT 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, JAMES CURRY, BOBBY JOE LAWRENCE AND PHILLIP PATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/30/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DONN
Meda AB v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-09-03 · Published · cited 1× · 969 F. Supp. 2d 360; 2013 WL 4734811; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125699
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This action arises out of the acquisition in late 2006 and early 2007 by Plaintiff Meda AB (“Meda”) of a European pharmaceutical business from Defendant 3M Company (“3M”). Meda alleges that 3M breached the acquisition agreement signed on November 8, 2006 (“Acquisition Agreement”), as well as the implied covenant of good faith and fair deali
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013-08-06 · Published · cited 156× · 725 F.3d 1315; 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1717; 2013 WL 3984988; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16203
REYNA, Circuit Judge. This appeal deals with claim construction disputes arising out of 3M Innovative Properties Company and 3M Company’s (collectively, “3M”) allegations of patent infringement brought against Tredegar Corporation and Tredegar Film Products Corporation (collectively, “Tredegar”) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (“district court”). 3M competes in the elastomeric laminate ind
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008-08-19 · Published · cited 15× · 538 F.3d 814; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17589; 2008 WL 3844196
538 F.3d 814 (2008) Geraldine KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-3394. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 20, 2008. Decided August 19, 2008. *815 John S. Bishof, Jr. (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appella
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993-04-09 · Published · cited 28× · 990 F.2d 974; 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2008; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7603; 1993 WL 105113
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. Although the issue is a close one, I believe that the district court correctly determined that there is no genuine issue of triable fact that justifies further proceedings on Mr. Stromberger’s allegation that 3M fraudulently induced his resignation. The record will not support the allegation that 3M knowingly made a false statement of material fact, s
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 136 Wash. App. 1040
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-2-37888-7, James D. Cayce, J., entered August 17, 2005. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Coleman and Ellington, JJ.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-11-25 · Published · cited 36× · 772 F.3d 1001; 2014 WL 6661086
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1839 JOYCE BARLOW, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, and JOHN CRANE−HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED; E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INC.; HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/a John H. Hampshire Compa
3M Co. v. Johnsonpublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005-01-20 · Published · cited 45× · 895 So. 2d 151; 2005 WL 107134
895 So.2d 151 (2005) 3M COMPANY f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Simeon JOHNSON, James Curry, Bobby Joe Lawrence and Phillip Pate. No. 2002-CA-01651-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 20, 2005. Rehearing Denied March 24, 2005. *154 Donna Brown Jacobs, John C. Henegan, Jackson, W. Wayne
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-09-16 · Published · cited 91× · 542 F.3d 1193; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19567; 2008 WL 4205761
542 F.3d 1193 (2008) 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMTEX SECURITY, INC., doing business as Amtex Global Services, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3519. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 11, 2008. Filed: September 16, 2008. *1195 Robert A. Burke, argued, Philadelphia, PA, (Brian S. G