Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “KILLIAN v. GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL”
Dobkin v. University of Baltimore School of Lawpublic domain
HOTTEN, J. Appellant, Donald Dobkin (“Mr.Dobkin”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against appellee, the University of Baltimore School of Law (“U.B.”), alleging that U.B. failed to hire him as an immigration law professor when he was fifty-six years of age, due to age discrimination,1 in violation of the Md.Code (1984, 2009 RepLVol., 2012 Supp.), § 20-606(a) of the State
396 S.C. 390 (2011) 720 S.E.2d 920 SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent, v. MOTHER and Father, Defendants, Of whom Mother is the, Appellant. In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18. No. 4922. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard September 13, 2011. Decided December 16, 2011. <
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmarkpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA ROBERT VANDE KROL, Petitioner Employee, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, SUPERSTITION FIRE & MEDICAL, Respondent Employer, BENCHMARK INSURANCE, Respondent Insurance Carrier.
Alejandro Amoles Jr. v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Affirm and Opinion Filed August 19, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00556-CR ALEJANDRO AMOLES JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Houston v. Sectek, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________ ) CORA HOUSTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-2218 (RWR) ) SECTEK, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) _______
Houston v. Sectek, Inc.public domain
680 F.Supp.2d 215 (2010) Cora HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. SECTEK, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-2218 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 28, 2010. *217 Lisa Alexis Jones, Lisa Alexis Jones, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Alan S. Block, D'Ana E. Johnson, Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Cr
Conn v. American National Red Crosspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Cathy Conn was warned for undermining the leadership of her newly' installed supervisor at the American Red- Cross, and then terminated several months later for failing to heed the warning and several other purported transgressions. Believing she was actually fired because of her age an
Dollar v. Smithway Motor Xpress, Inc.public domain
787 F.Supp.2d 896 (2011) Christine Ann DOLLAR, Plaintiff, v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, INC., Smithway Motor Xpress Corp., a Nevada Corporation, Defendants. No. C09-3043-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. April 13, 2011. *901 John P. Roehrick, Roehrick, Hulting Krull & Blumberg, PC, Des Moines, IA, fo
Catherine J. Healy v. F. Don James, Individually and as President of Central Connecticut State Collegepublic domain
TIMBERS, District Judge: Appellants, eight students at Central Connecticut State College (CCSC), New Britain, Connecticut, appeal from a judgment entered after hearings in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, T. Emmet Clarie, District Judge, dismissing their complaint which sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the President of
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, United States District Judge This multi-district products liability litigation involves a contraceptive product: the Mirena intrauterine device ("IUD") developed, manufactured, and distributed by defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy (together, "Bayer"). The Mirena IUD is implanted in the uterus and functions by releasing a synthetic steroid hormone known as levonorgestre
THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 7, 2013 June 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover,
3M Company and Subsidiariespublic domain
United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As