⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “KHAN, M.D. v. Stephen”

People v. Khanpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019-07-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 IL App (2d) 160724
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-11-04 · Published · cited 898× · 139 L. Ed. 2d 199; 118 S. Ct. 275; 522 U.S. 3; 1997 U.S. LEXIS 6705
522 U.S. 3 (1997) STATE OIL CO. v. KHAN et al. No. 96-871. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 7, 1997. Decided November 4, 1997. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT *4 *5 O'Connor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.</
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995-04-21 · Published · cited 38× · 53 F.3d 507; 42 Fed. R. Serv. 201; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9434
MINER, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Deborah Williams, Rosaly Saba Khalil, Lancaster Lo and Gilbert Ross appeal from judgments of conviction and sentence entered on November 10, 1993, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Martin, J.) following a jury trial. Defendant-appellant Mohammed Sohail Khan appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered on December 3,1993, in the
Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE The Estate of SUSAN J. ) MOULDER, MICHAEL J. ) MOULDER, as Executor for the ) Estate and Individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-03-299 AML ) SUJUNG PARK, M.D., )
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 UT App 142; 377 P.3d 702; 816 Utah Adv. Rep. 21; 2016 Utah App. LEXIS 146
Memorandum Decision TOOMEY, Judge: T1 Petitioner Nasrulla Khan disputes the Utah State Tax Commission's determination of his 2011 renter's refund. Although we disagree with the Commission's calculation in this case, we ultimately agree with its conclusion that Khan is entitled to a refund of $106. We therefore decline to disturb the Commis-ston's determin
Khan v. Gonzalespublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 10× · 37 F. Supp. 3d 213; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43294
Memorandum Opinion Thomas F. Hogan, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Zafar H. Khan filed this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); the Civil Rights Act of 1991, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq., the Civil Rights Attorney’s Award Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-07-30 · Published · cited 51× · 7 F.4th 685
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1960 ___________________________ Lauren Hawse; Frank R. O’Brien, Jr.; Jean M. O’Brien; Stephen J. Pieper, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants, v. Sam Page, in his capacity as County Executive of St. Lo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-08 · Published · cited 1× · 191 F.3d 998; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7385; 99 Daily Journal DAR 9381; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21386
191 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 1999) ALAN J. MISHLER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ROBERT D. CLIFT, M.D., Defendant,andNEVADA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS; THEODORE JACOBS, M.D.; ANTHONY J. CARTER, M.D.; M. RONALD AVERY, JR., M.D.; RICHARD BAKER, M.D.; IKRAM U. KHAN, M.D.; KATHLEEN EBNER; EVA G. SIMMONS; LEO A. WILNER, Defendants-Appellants.ALAN J. MISHLER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ROBERT D. CLIFT, M.D., Defendant-Appellant,
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 463 B.R. 786; 2011 WL 3320970
463 B.R. 786 (2011) In re Shakeel S. KHAN, Ayesha Khan, Debtors. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., Plaintiff v. Shakeel S. Khan, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-15387-SSM. Adversary No. 10-1431. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 2, 2011. *788 Paul J. Feinman, Esquire, Petty, Livingston,
Superior Court of Delaware · 2021-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JESSICA MIDDLETON, and ) WILLIAM MIDDLETON, Husband ) and Wife, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) C.A. No.: N18C-03-120 VLM ) KHAN OBSTETRICS AND ) GYNECOLOGY ASSOCIATES, ) P.A., and NASREEN KHAN, D.O., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Submitted: May 26, 2021 Decided: July 16, 2021 Upon Consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine on Comparative Negligence, GRANTED; Upon Consideration of Defendants’ Motion in Limine on Admissibility of Smoking Evidence,
Drozdzal v. Khanpublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 1981-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 109 Misc. 2d 29; 439 N.Y.S.2d 574; 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2349
OPINION OF THE COURT Lawrence E. Kahn, J. In the case at bar, motions have been made on behalf of the defendants, County of Albany and City of Albany, for orders pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) dismissing *30the complaint upon the ground that, as to said defendants, it fails to state a cause of action. The action seeks money d
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-18 · Published · cited 33× · 34 F.4th 810
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-10-10 · Published · cited 11× · 977 F. Supp. 2d 214; 2013 WL 5585007; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146696
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge: Pending before the Court are the objections of the Defendants Tariq A. Khan, Senita Khan, Farouq Khan a/k/a/ Shahid F. Khan, and Imran M. Khan s/h/a Iram M. Khan (collectively “the Khans”) to the August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. The Report recommended that this Court grant the Plaintiff 7-Eleven, Inc.’
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-07-23 · Published · cited 1× · 956 F. Supp. 2d 515; 2013 WL 3878605; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109264
ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the attached joint letter, dated July 17, 2013, from Plaintiff, Defendant Midland Funding, LLC (“Midland”); Defendants Peter T. Roach & Associates, P.C., Peter T. Roach, and Timothy J. Murtha (the “Roach Defendants”); and non-party Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C. (“EEC”), regarding EEC’s claim of privilege over (1) its
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2010-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00542-CV Brushy Creek Enterprises, Inc. and Tahseen Khan, Individually, Appellants v.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986-03-25 · Published · cited 107× · 787 F.2d 28; 20 Fed. R. Serv. 15; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23429
GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge: This case, which arises out of a scheme to smuggle heroin into our country, presents only one question deserving more than summary discussion: Should the district court have dismissed certain counts charged against the defendant in the superseding indictment on the ground that they were added only as a result of “prosecutorial vindictiveness” in r
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2007-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00435-CV Charles Ly, Appellant v. Rodney Schmidt, M.D., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-001242, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2007-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00435-CV Charles Ly, Appellant v.
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 26, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143102 & (23)