Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “KEYS v. WILLIAMS”
Keys v. Keyspublic domain
¶ 1. Janet Keys (Janet) applied for modification of her divorce settlement with Charles Richard Keys (Charles). The chancellor altered the original judgment of divorce, and ordered: (1) Charles to pay $4,148, representing one-half of the MPACT expenses for Shannon, the parties' minor daughter; (2) Charles to pay for Shannon's sorority expenses; (3) a TIGR account in Shannon's name was an irrevocable gift to her and would not be used to reimburse Janet for Charles's share of Shannon's
Keys v. Statepublic domain
340 S.W.3d 526 (2011) Paul Kevin KEYS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-10-00091-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. April 12, 2011. Troy A. Hornsby, Miller, James, Miller & Hornsby, LLP, Texarkana, for appellant. William W. Ramsay, County Atty., Mt. Vernon, for appellee. Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ.
Kathryn Keys v. Humana, Inc.public domain
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Kathryn Keys filed a class-action lawsuit against her former employer Defendant-Appellee Humana, Inc., alleging claims of race discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court granted
People v. Keyspublic domain
2023 IL App (4th) 210630 FILED August 14, 2023 Carla Bender NOS. 4-21-0630, 4-22-0017, 4-22-0018 cons. 4th District Appellate
Public Employee Claims Division v. Keyspublic domain
John B. Robbins, Judge, concurring. I concur with the majority in reversing the Commission’s decision that requires appellant to provide appellee a hand-controlled, wheelchair accessible van; however, I would remand this claim for further proceedings rather than dismissing the claim altogether. The prompt provision of medical services reasonably necessary for the treatment
Keys v. United Statespublic domain
767 A.2d 255 (2001) Breond KEYS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 98-CF-857. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 20, 2000. Decided February 22, 2001. *257 William T. Morrison, Silver Spring, MD, appointed by the court, for appellant Breond Keys. Mark Lesko, Assistant United States
State v. Williamspublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jaycoby Terreak Williams, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000872 Appeal From Allendale County Perry M. Buckner, III, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5791 Heard December 12, 2019 – Filed January 13, 2021
Keys v. Nadelpublic domain
KULONGOSKI, J. The issue in this medical negligence case is whether certain prior consistent statements of a witness who testified at trial were admissible as nonhearsay statements, pursuant to Oregon Evidence Code (OEC) 801(4)(a)(B), which provides: “A statement is not hearsay if: “(a) The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cr
State v. Keyspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Keys, 2023-Ohio-1454.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AARON KEYS, Defendant-Appellant.
Keys Wi-Fi, Inc. v. City of Key Westpublic domain
752 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2010) KEYS WI-FI, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KEY WEST, a Florida municipal corporation, Defendant. Case No. 10-10014-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 28, 2010. *1275 Susan Fossa Delegal, William Tucker Craig, Billing, Cochran, Lyles, Mauro & Ramsey, P.A., F
Com. v. Keys, B.public domain
J-S23034-24 2024 PA Super 297 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : BRANDON KEYS : : Appellant : N
Johnson v. Williamspublic domain
Blackwell, Justice. In 2006, Terrence Johnson was tried by a Floyd County jury and convicted of armed robbery, aggravated assault with intent to rob, and unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Johnson appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions, but it found that the trial judge failed to exercise his sentencing discretion and remanded the case for resentencing. See Johnson v. State
State v. Keyspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,866 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. LUQMAN YUSUF KEYS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A criminal prosecution in Kansas generally is started by filing a com
Keys v. Nadelpublic domain
ARMSTRONG, J. In an action for negligent medical care, plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict for defendant.1 Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred by refusing to admit prior consistent statements about her condition to rebut defendant’s charge that she was untruthful. We reverse. Plaintiff first saw defendant in 1990, complaining of persistent abdominal pain and constipat
Sallee v. Cross Keys Garage, Inc.public domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Cross Keys Garage Inc. (Employer) appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) awarding its former employee, Samuel Sallee, (Claimant), unemployment benefits finding that Claimant was discharged from employment for reasons other than misconduct. We affirm. We have read the briefs of the parties and have reviewed the legal file.
Hammock Ex Rel. Hammock v. Keyspublic domain
93 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2000) Virginia Francis HAMMOCK, a minor, By and Through her mother and next friend, Jude HAMMOCK, Plaintiff, v. Larry KEYS, Ernie Rosado, Toni Stanton and Albert Thomas, individually; The Baldwin County Board of Education; Anthony P. Kaiser, Dennis V. Stastka, Don McGriff, Julia A. Summerlin, Ruth S. Underwood, James D. Williams, and Robert A. Wills, as members of the Baldwin County Board of Education; Albert D. Thomas, as Supe
Keys v. Duke Universitypublic domain
435 S.E.2d 820 (1993) Ruth M. KEYS, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry E. Keys, deceased v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, trading and doing business as Duke University Hospital and Private Diagnostic Clinic. No. 9214SC1144. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 2, 1993. R. Marie Sides, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant. Moore & Van Allen by
Hill v. Williamspublic domain
Blackwell, Justice. In October 1998, Torrey Hill was tried by a Houston County jury upon an indictment that charged Hill with several crimes, including the forcible rape of A. G., who was fourteen years of age at the time of the alleged crimes. Although the indictment did not expressly charge Hill with the statutory rape of A. G., the trial court instructed the jury — at the req
Keys v. Koontzpublic domain
The Court has issued the following Order on Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the above entitled matter: Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied.
Keys v. PV Holding Corp.public domain
Keys v PV Holding Corp. (2022 NY Slip Op 03105) Keys v PV Holding Corp. 2022 NY Slip Op 03105 Decided on May 11, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.