Cases

*571OPINION OF THE COURT LEWIS, Circuit Judge. We are called upon in this case principally to perform one of our most delicate duties— determining whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority in enacting a federal law. At issue is the power of Congress to criminalize “carjacking” — the armed theft of an automobile from the presence of anothe

MEMORANDUM** Kevin Bishop appeals pro se the district court’s order on remand imposing $100 in sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 in Bishop’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Henderson, Nevada, and City officials (collectively “the City.”) Bishop’s challenge to the propriety of sanctions is foreclosed by the law of the case because this court already determined that an awa

OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE KERN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on Amount of Appeal-Related Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 299). Plaintiffs request $368,827.50 in attorneys’ fees, $1,942.37 in costs, and any enhancement of the fee award deemed reasonable by the Court. For reasons set. forth below, the motion is granted in the amount of $298,742.77, which includes $296,847

211 S.W.3d 71 (2006) Kevin BISHOP, Appellant, v. MANPOWER, INC. OF CENTRAL KENTUCKY, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-000351-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. December 15, 2006. *73 Charles W. Gorham, Joseph H. Dahlman, Lexington, KY, for appellant. Laurie Goetz Kemp, Wendy Carole Hyland, Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, LLP, Louisvill

MEMORANDUM *** Kevin Bishop (“Bishop”) appeals pro se the district court’s order, on remand from this Court, awarding the City of Henderson (the “City’) and City officials attorneys’ fees in the amount of $24,141.88 under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, arising from Bishop’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City. Bishop v. City of Henderson, 242 F.3d 380, 2000 WL 1612157 (9th Cir.2000). The City cross-appeal

MEMORANDUM ** Kevin Bishop appeals pro se the district court’s award of costs to prevailing defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm because Bishop fails to show that the district court abused its discretion in awarding costs. See U.S. ex rel. Lindenthal v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 61 F.3d 1402, 1414 (9th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.

636 F.3d 757 (2011) Russell A. BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark A. HACKEL, Sheriff; James Stanley, Deputy; John Cantea, Deputy; S. Anderman, Deputy; Harrell, Deputy, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellants, Kevin Hartley, Sgt.; Roberts, Captain; Moore, Lt.; Sanborn, J/A; Laura Hogan, Deputy, Defendants. No. 09-1791. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Arg

OPINION WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. This appeal involves questions regarding when the police may legally arrest a suspect based on information provided by an accomplice and th

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Sean Todd appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee David G. Bishop in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Bishop deprived him of a protected property interest in his continued employment with the Washington County Interagency Narcotics *660(WIN) Team without c

Schultheis, J. ¶1 Under article 111(a) of the interstate agreement on detainers (IAD), chapter 9.100 RCW, a person who is serving a term of imprisonment in another state and who is facing charges in Washington is entitled to trial in Washington within 180 days after Washington receives that person’s request for final disposition of the charges. RCW 9.100.010, art. 111(a). Otherwise, under article IV of the IAD, when Washington l

764 N.E.2d 24 (2002) 198 Ill.2d 495 261 Ill.Dec. 733 Catherine R. BISHOP, Appellant, v. Kelly BURGARD et al. (Administrative Committee, as Adm'r of the Associates Health and Welfare Plan, Appellee). No. 90742. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 25, 2002. *26 J. Kevin Wolfe, of Harve

741 N.E.2d 306 (2000) 317 Ill. App.3d 923 251 Ill.Dec. 712 Catherine R. BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelly BURGARD, Defendant (Administrative Committee, as Adm. of the Associates Health and Welfare Plan, Defendant-Appellant). No. 3-99-0766. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. December 1, 2000.

RULING JAMES J. BRADY, District Judge. The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated November 6, 2014 (doc. no. 50). The defendants filed an objection which restates their prior argument. The Magistrate Judge’s application of the law is correct.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. On December 1, 1997 defendant National Health Insurance Company (National) issued an Individual Hospital Surgical Expense Policy to plaintiff Oliver Bishop, III (Bishop III), on which his son, Oliver Bishop, IV (Bishop IV), as a member of his family, was insured. The policy provided coverage for certain medical expenses for Bishop III and the members of h

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Sue Ann and Michael Bishop (“Bishops”) appeal the district court’s decision denying them recovery under an insurance policy issued by Defendant-Appellee Pacific Employers Insurance Co. (“Pacific”), and denying their motion to remand the action to state court. After their daughter Summer Lynn Bishop was killed in a car accident, the Bishops attempted to recover

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Notice of Motion and Partial Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Macon County, Macon County Sheriffs Department, Robert L. Holland, Charles J. Lau, and the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company [Doc. 9]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the Standing Orders of Designation of this Court, United

Punchar v Bishop (2024 NY Slip Op 04086) Punchar v Bishop 2024 NY Slip Op 04086 Decided on July 31, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

[Cite as State v. Bishop, 2025-Ohio-2664.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Kevin W. Popham

168 S.W.3d 414 (2005) ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF LOUISVILLE, Appellant, v. Kyle BURDEN, Appellee. No. 2004-CA-000086-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. December 10, 2004. Reconsider Denied January 26, 2005. Discretionary Review Denied by Supreme Court August 17, 2005. *415 Edward H. Stopher, Raymond

246 Wis.2d 879 (2001) 2001 WI App 154 631 N.W.2d 656 Beryl BISHOP, Jackie Busch, Peter Busch and Joanne Bishop, Plaintiffs-Appellants,[†] Mary BRENSINGER and Wayne Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, Wisconsin, Jeannie Hefty and Kevin McKillip, Defendants-Respondents. No. 00-2346. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.