⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “KELLUM v. 3M COMPANY”

Chesher v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2017-02-13 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. Supp. 3d 693; 2017 A.M.C. 305; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20706; 2017 WL 569948
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Crane’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James Wilson Chesher (“Chesher”), a former machinist mate and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy, together with his wife, plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-03-01 · Published · cited 56× · 636 F.3d 874; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3874; 2011 WL 692059
636 F.3d 874 (2011) Heidi ZAMECNIK and Alexander Nuxoll, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIAN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT # 204, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 10-2485, 10-3635. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 19, 2011. Decided March 1, 2011. *875 Nathan W. Kellum, Jonathan A. Scruggs
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
C,¢§¢NO°‘L'+.'LZ>»QQ%¢W-LR , ` mpzq . wm D\s'rmm”. um FAm/ALS :FEB.ZOZMS RDUS’I'OH ,TE/Xk.é' ` 2 c'HR\sToPHEH A.PmNE . CLERK ’WROMLBEN;Y APPF,L\_A\~\‘Y V ’\’m,§'r¢Tms 4 n - APPLLLLE, ' ONMM;\,V\HNM:L;KU§§/No. 10 l‘l bZ‘+ FP\ome, l 901'“ GumclAL ' Dls*rmrfl Cc)um OF lé¥m_m's CouM/N,TE).<15 Lz_ DP Com mm 1b€,m\‘r\€.s [)FPKpct,Lz,s wm Counss_\