⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “KARLYN ROBERTS”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-10-11 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 11, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00309-CV ——————————— KENNETH J. LEE, M.D., K.L. MODERN SPINE, PLLC, AND KARLYN J. POWELL, M.D., Appellants V.
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2024-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 TN WC 4
FILED Feb 07, 2024 08:01 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012-08-30 · Published · cited 33× · 2012 ND 178; 820 N.W.2d 740; 177 Oil & Gas Rep. 1029; 2012 N.D. LEXIS 192; 2012 WL 3734371
Filed 8/30/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 178 Richard J. Nichols as Trustee of the Richard Nichols Mineral Trust Agreement dated May 28, 2009; Robby J. Nichols and
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984-11-28 · Published · cited 14× · 749 F.2d 915; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16377
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents another “date of purchase” wrinkle in the tapestry of insider liability for short-swing profits under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b). Appellant John H. Riseman appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusett
Maurer v. Wagnerpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993-12-06 · Published · cited 6× · 509 N.W.2d 258; 1993 N.D. LEXIS 231; 1993 WL 497510
509 N.W.2d 258 (1993) Karlyn MAURER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Wallace WAGNER, Defendant and Appellee. Civ. No. 930154. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 6, 1993. *259 Collin P. Dobrovolny (argued), of Lamont, Skowronek & Dobrovolny, Minot, for plaintiff and appellant. James E. Nostdahl (argued), of Pringle &am;
Abt v. Salazarpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 303 F.R.D. 166; 2014 WL 1400847; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50766
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Renee Abt moves to compel the production of documents from the U.S. Park Police to support her allegations of unlawful employment discrimination. Defendant contends that Ms. Abt’s document requests already have been produced, do not exist, or were not properly sought by her in
Union v. Bloombergpublic domain
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 88 Mass. App. Ct. 671; 41 N.E.3d 1093
Berry, J. This action concerns a settlement agreement between a condominium trust, among others, and the owners of property that abuts the condominium. The defendants, trustees of the Longyear at Fisher Hill Condominium Trust (collectively, the trust), appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs, Lauri Union and Stanley Rosenzweig, whereby a Superior Court judge r
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990-10-09 · Published · cited 5× · 750 F. Supp. 909; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13622; 1990 WL 177584
750 F.Supp. 909 (1990) CORNELL VILLAGE TOWER CONDOMINIUM, Harold R. Metcalf, Karlyn A. Metcalf, Imre G. Hidvegi, Denise F. Hidgevi, Thomas Roby, Mary Roby, David Z. Feuer, and Joyce H. Feuer, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Samuel Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and Gertrude Jordan, Regional Administrator of Chicago Area Housing and Urban Development Office, Defendants. No. 88
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007-10-10 · Published · cited 4× · 265 S.W.3d 125; 100 Ark. App. 134; 2007 Ark. App. LEXIS 693
265 S.W.3d 125 (2007) Hugh Owen WINN et al. v. WINN ENTERPRISES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al. No. CA 06-1375. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. October 10, 2007. Burbank Dodson & Barker, PLLC, by: Don B. Dodson, El Dorado, AR, for appellants. Harrell, Lindsey & Carr, P.A., by: Paul E. Lindsey, Camden, AR, for appellees. DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. <
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2018-06-08 · Published · cited 38× · 549 S.W.3d 107
Holly Kirby, J. We granted permission to appeal in this case to address the methods by which a trial court may determine the "fair value" of the shares of a dissenting shareholder under Tennessee's dissenters' rights statutes, Tennessee Code Annotated sections 48-23-101, et seq. In doing so, we overrule Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc. ,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-07-06 · Published · cited 18× · 14 F. App'x 457
O’MALLEY, District Judge. Plaintiff Karen Miller sued her ex-employer, defendant Alldata Corporation, and her former supervisor, defendant Robert Weiffenbach, jointly and severally, for gender discrimination in violation of Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 37.2501-2507. A jury found in Miller’s favor and awarded her $16,000 in economic damages and $300,000 for emotional distress damages.
Williams v. Workpublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010-05-26 · Published · cited 11× · 995 A.2d 744; 192 Md. App. 438; 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 78
995 A.2d 744 (2010) 192 Md. App. 438 Steven L. WILLIAMS, et al. v. William C. WORK, et al. Steven L. Williams, et al. v. Ace American Insurance Company, et al. Nos. 1652, 1653 Sept.Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 26, 2010. *746 Brian Bennett (Terziu & Bennett, on brief
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 243 F.3d 486
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Siegel-Robert, Inc. (hereinafter “the Company”), a closely-held corporation headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri following a bench trial, holding that the Company’s valuation of its mi
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-02-26 · Published · cited 11× · 243 F.3d 486; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2760
243 F.3d 486 (8th Cir. 2001) THOMAS A. SWOPE, JUDY N. SWOPE, ESTATE OF O.W. SCHNEIDER, JR., BY AND THROUGH PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE ESTATE OF O.W. SCHNEIDER, JR., TRACY LEIGH SCHNEIDER MORRIS; O.W. SCHNEIDER, III; KRIS DOUGLAS SCHNEIDER; MELODY DAWN SCHNEIDER; MARK WILLIAM SCHNEIDER; TRACY LEIGH SCHNEIDER MORRIS; O.W. SCHNEIDER, III, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS,v.SIEGEL-ROBERT, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE.
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002-08-05 · Published · cited 1× · 112 Wash. App. 865
Kennedy, J. Under Washington’s Business Corporation Act, shareholders are entitled to dissent from certain proposed corporate actions, including mergers, and demand that the corporation pay “fair value” for the shares if the proposed action is effectuated. In a case of first impression in Washington, the trial court ruled as a matter of law that Matthew G. Norton Company could not apply a lack of marketability discount and a disc
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002-08-05 · Published · cited 8× · 51 P.3d 159
51 P.3d 159 (2002) 112 Wash.App. 865 MATTHEW G. NORTON COMPANY, formerly known as Northwest Building Corporation, a Washington corporation, Appellant, v. Theodore H. SMYTH, Trustee of the Elizabeth M. Smyth 1987 Rev. Trust, and Stephen G. Clapp, Respondents. No. 47795-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. August 5, 2002.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002-11-22 · Published · cited 20× · 779 N.E.2d 30; 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1937; 2002 WL 31640784
779 N.E.2d 30 (2002) Mark R. WENZEL, Appellant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff below, v. HOPPER & GALLIHER, P.C., formerly known As Hopper, Wenzel & Galliher, P.C., George W. Hopper and Mark R. Galliher, P.C., et. al., Appellees-Petitioner and Third-Party Defendants below. No. 49A02-0105-CV-274. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 22, 2002.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-07-02 · Published · cited 8× · 375 F.3d 1303; 71 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1545; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13784; 2004 WL 1489101
375 F.3d 1303 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.G.D. SEARLE & CO., INC., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-1304. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 2, 2004. Gerald P. Dodson, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of Palo Alto, Califor
Bell v. Bellpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-01-04 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0002p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant, - STEPHEN M. BELL,
Bell v. Bellpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-01-04 · Published · cited 128× · 512 F.3d 223; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 155; 2008 WL 50315
512 F.3d 223 (2008) Stephen M. BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 04-5523. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 6, 2007. Decided and Filed: January 4, 2008. *224 *225 ARGUED: Gretchen L. Swift, Federal Public Defe