⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “KAREN SUE GOODALL”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 1991-02-21 · Published · cited 2× · 804 S.W.2d 190; 1991 WL 3549
804 S.W.2d 190 (1991) Karen COX, Appellant, v. THEE EVERGREEN CHURCH, and Thee Evergreen Congressional Church, Appellees. No. 01-90-00204-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist). January 17, 1991. Rehearing Overruled February 21, 1991. Timothy R. Cappolino, Houston, for appellant. Michael C. Neel, Houston, for appellees. Befo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-06-11 · Published · cited 18× · 1 F.4th 769
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 11, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT LORRAINE M.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-02-02 · Published · cited 3× · 640 F. App'x 445
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Victor Davis, who is black, was terminated by Landscape Forms, Inc. (LFI) for falsification of a timesheet, intimidation of team members, and interference with a company investigation. Davis sued LFI for racial harassment, race discrimination, and retaliation, asserting claims under state and federal statutes. These claims are based' on incidents in the workplace with racial overtones. Summary judgment
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 11× · 123 F. Supp. 3d 1283; 2015 WL 4756837
*1286ORDER RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE AND SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTIONS REGARDING THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS EDWARD F. SHEA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court, without oral argument,-are the Suttell Defendants’1 Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff Gray’s “Statute of Limitations” Claim(s), ECF No. 480, Plaint
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 1999-08-12 · Published · cited 157× · 999 S.W.2d 538; 150 Oil & Gas Rep. 364; 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5922; 1999 WL 603505
999 S.W.2d 538 (1999) STABLE ENERGY, L.P., Robust Oil Co. and Anchor Operating Co., Appellants, v. W.B. NEWBERRY, Sr., Peter Hougaard, Robert C. Freymuller, Mark P. Nibbelink, Cameron D. Sewell, Lawrence E. Walton, the Estate of Ralph Walton, Deceased, the Estate of Lawcile Walton, Deceased, Andrew Kugler, Jr., James A. Robbins, Guy W. Anderson, Jr., Morgan Jones, Cecil L. Smith, Maria M. Quinn, and Rodel Oil & Gas Company, Appellees.
District Court, E.D. California · 2012-08-08 · Published · cited 5× · 889 F. Supp. 2d 1198; 2012 WL 3260452; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111744
MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: CENTURY 21’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Century 21 Real Estate LLC (“Century 21”) filed an action against All Professional Realty, Inc. (“All Professional”), Steven M. Wright, and Carol Wright arising from All Professional’s continued use of Century 21’s trademarks following the terminations of real estate brokerage franchise
State v. Wadelpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-04-30 · Published · cited 5× · 398 S.W.3d 68; 2013 WL 1800231; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 523
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. Christopher J. Wadel (Wadel) appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.062, one count of first-degree statutory rape in violation of section 566.032, and two counts of first-degree child endangerment in violation of section 568.045.1 Wadel claims that the evidence was insufficient to suppo
District Court, D. Idaho · 2012-12-06 · Published · cited 10× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 944; 2012 WL 6086848; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174022
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Patrick Donahoe’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). (Dkt. 23.) Donahoe, the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, requests summary judgment on the two claims former postal service employee ' Michael Bushfíeld asserts i
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-06-15 · Published · cited 20× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 977
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 99 MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officer Christa Peters, and SFPD Officer Daniel Bonnel (collectively, “Defend
District Court, D. Arizona · 2009-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 618 F. Supp. 2d 1127; 186 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2322; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28703
618 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2009) Peter MARCEAU, Jon Bodine, Rhonda McKinney, Brian Pine, Kathryn Smith, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local 1269, Dex Media, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Karen Ortega-Matson, and Philip Wheeler, Defendants. Case No. CV 05-2874-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2009.
Wallis v. Spencerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-14 · Published · cited 2× · 193 F.3d 1054
193 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) LAUREN WALLIS, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, REBECCA LYNN WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; JESSIE WALLIS, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; REBECCA LYNN WALLIS; WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MARY SPENCER, M.D.; CANDACE YOUNG, PH.D.; RACHEL STECKS; CITY OF SAN DIEGO; CITY OF ESCONDIDO; CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, A DIVISION OF THE SAN DIEGO COUN
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 530 B.R. 711; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 1468
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Maureen A. Tighe, United States Bankruptcy Judge On January 9, 2012, debtor Owner Management Service, LLC; Trust Holding Service Co; Bill Pay Service and Boston Holding (collectively, the “Debtor”) filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition. This adversary proceeding (the “Substantive Consolidation Complaint”) is related to the Debt- or’s pending chapter 7
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998-09-01 · Published · cited 126× · 154 F.3d 426; 332 U.S. App. D.C. 104; 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20202; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21398
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE, with whom SILBERMAN, GINSBURG and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, join. WALD, Circuit Judge: The 1985 amendments to the Animal Welfare Act (“AWA”) direct the Secretary of Agriculture to “promulgate standards to govern the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation o
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 193 F.3d 1054; 99 Daily Journal DAR 9599; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7581; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21950
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge RYMER. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case involves a conflict between the legitimate role of the state in protecting children from abusive parents, and the rights of children and parents to be free from arbitrary and undue governmental interference. Such conflicts occur with increasing frequency these days. The problem of child abuse is a critical one, with
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-09-14 · Published · cited 142× · 202 F.3d 1126; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1455; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 35873
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case involves a conflict between the legitimate role of the state in protecting children from abusive parents, and the rights of children and parents to be free from arbitrary and undue governmental interference. Such conflicts occur with increasing frequency these days. The problem of child abuse is a critical one, with deep personal and social costs. For too long, intra-familial sexual abus
No. 97-55579public domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-02-07 · Published · cited 187× · 202 F.3d 1126
202 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2000) LAUREN WALLIS, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, REBECCA LYNN WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; JESSIE WALLIS, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; REBECCA LYNN WALLIS; WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MARY SPENCER, M.D.; CANDACE YOUNG, PH.D.; RACHEL STECKS; ORDER AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO; CITY OF AMENDED ESCONDIDO; CHILD PROTECTIVE OPINION SERVICES, A D
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003-04-02 · Published · cited 54× · 662 N.W.2d 387; 255 Mich. App. 83
662 N.W.2d 387 (2003) 255 Mich. App. 83 HIGGINS LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and John Doering, John Smith, Mary Smith, William Sharp, Arlean Sharp, Gary W. Wilson, Jean Wilson, Timothy J. Pipkins, Doris Pipkins, John Wade, and Elizabeth Wade, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, Roscommon County Road Commission, and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appelle
State v. Plattpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973-06-04 · Published · cited 15× · 496 S.W.2d 878; 1973 Mo. App. LEXIS 1434
496 S.W.2d 878 (1973) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Preston PLATT, Appellant. No. KCD 26497. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. June 4, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1973. *879 Robert G. Duncan, Duncan & Russell, Kansas City, for appellant. John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Vincent F. I
District Court, S.D. California · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 16× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 1234
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998-09-01 · Published · cited 0× · 204 F.3d 229
154 F.3d 426 332 U.S.App.D.C. 104, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,202 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Appellees,v.Daniel R. GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., andNational Association for Biomedical Research, Appellants. Nos. 97-5009, 97-5031 and 97-5074 United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued in