Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “KAREN SUE GOODALL”
Cox v. Thee Evergreen Churchpublic domain
804 S.W.2d 190 (1991) Karen COX, Appellant, v. THEE EVERGREEN CHURCH, and Thee Evergreen Congressional Church, Appellees. No. 01-90-00204-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist). January 17, 1991. Rehearing Overruled February 21, 1991. Timothy R. Cappolino, Houston, for appellant. Michael C. Neel, Houston, for appellees. Befo
Ramos v. Banner Healthpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 11, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT LORRAINE M.
Davis v. Landscape Forms, Inc.public domain
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Victor Davis, who is black, was terminated by Landscape Forms, Inc. (LFI) for falsification of a timesheet, intimidation of team members, and interference with a company investigation. Davis sued LFI for racial harassment, race discrimination, and retaliation, asserting claims under state and federal statutes. These claims are based' on incidents in the workplace with racial overtones. Summary judgment
Gray v. Suttell & Associatespublic domain
*1286ORDER RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE AND SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTIONS REGARDING THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS EDWARD F. SHEA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court, without oral argument,-are the Suttell Defendants’1 Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff Gray’s “Statute of Limitations” Claim(s), ECF No. 480, Plaint
Stable Energy, L.P. v. Newberrypublic domain
999 S.W.2d 538 (1999) STABLE ENERGY, L.P., Robust Oil Co. and Anchor Operating Co., Appellants, v. W.B. NEWBERRY, Sr., Peter Hougaard, Robert C. Freymuller, Mark P. Nibbelink, Cameron D. Sewell, Lawrence E. Walton, the Estate of Ralph Walton, Deceased, the Estate of Lawcile Walton, Deceased, Andrew Kugler, Jr., James A. Robbins, Guy W. Anderson, Jr., Morgan Jones, Cecil L. Smith, Maria M. Quinn, and Rodel Oil & Gas Company, Appellees.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: CENTURY 21’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Century 21 Real Estate LLC (“Century 21”) filed an action against All Professional Realty, Inc. (“All Professional”), Steven M. Wright, and Carol Wright arising from All Professional’s continued use of Century 21’s trademarks following the terminations of real estate brokerage franchise
State v. Wadelpublic domain
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. Christopher J. Wadel (Wadel) appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.062, one count of first-degree statutory rape in violation of section 566.032, and two counts of first-degree child endangerment in violation of section 568.045.1 Wadel claims that the evidence was insufficient to suppo
Bushfield v. Donahoepublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Patrick Donahoe’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). (Dkt. 23.) Donahoe, the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, requests summary judgment on the two claims former postal service employee ' Michael Bushfíeld asserts i
Lawrence v. City & County of San Franciscopublic domain
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 99 MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”), San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) Officer Christa Peters, and SFPD Officer Daniel Bonnel (collectively, “Defend
618 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2009) Peter MARCEAU, Jon Bodine, Rhonda McKinney, Brian Pine, Kathryn Smith, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local 1269, Dex Media, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Karen Ortega-Matson, and Philip Wheeler, Defendants. Case No. CV 05-2874-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2009.
Wallis v. Spencerpublic domain
193 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) LAUREN WALLIS, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, REBECCA LYNN WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; JESSIE WALLIS, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; REBECCA LYNN WALLIS; WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MARY SPENCER, M.D.; CANDACE YOUNG, PH.D.; RACHEL STECKS; CITY OF SAN DIEGO; CITY OF ESCONDIDO; CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, A DIVISION OF THE SAN DIEGO COUN
Bank of America, N.A. v. Cd-04, Inc. (In re Owner Management Service, LLC Trustee Corps)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Maureen A. Tighe, United States Bankruptcy Judge On January 9, 2012, debtor Owner Management Service, LLC; Trust Holding Service Co; Bill Pay Service and Boston Holding (collectively, the “Debtor”) filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition. This adversary proceeding (the “Substantive Consolidation Complaint”) is related to the Debt- or’s pending chapter 7
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Glickmanpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. Dissenting Opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE, with whom SILBERMAN, GINSBURG and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, join. WALD, Circuit Judge: The 1985 amendments to the Animal Welfare Act (“AWA”) direct the Secretary of Agriculture to “promulgate standards to govern the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation o
Wallis ex rel. Wallis v. Spencerpublic domain
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge RYMER. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case involves a conflict between the legitimate role of the state in protecting children from abusive parents, and the rights of children and parents to be free from arbitrary and undue governmental interference. Such conflicts occur with increasing frequency these days. The problem of child abuse is a critical one, with
Wallis ex rel. Wallis v. Spencerpublic domain
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This case involves a conflict between the legitimate role of the state in protecting children from abusive parents, and the rights of children and parents to be free from arbitrary and undue governmental interference. Such conflicts occur with increasing frequency these days. The problem of child abuse is a critical one, with deep personal and social costs. For too long, intra-familial sexual abus
No. 97-55579public domain
202 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2000) LAUREN WALLIS, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, REBECCA LYNN WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; JESSIE WALLIS, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; REBECCA LYNN WALLIS; WILLIAM LAWRENCE WALLIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MARY SPENCER, M.D.; CANDACE YOUNG, PH.D.; RACHEL STECKS; ORDER AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO; CITY OF AMENDED ESCONDIDO; CHILD PROTECTIVE OPINION SERVICES, A D
662 N.W.2d 387 (2003) 255 Mich. App. 83 HIGGINS LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and John Doering, John Smith, Mary Smith, William Sharp, Arlean Sharp, Gary W. Wilson, Jean Wilson, Timothy J. Pipkins, Doris Pipkins, John Wade, and Elizabeth Wade, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, v. GERRISH TOWNSHIP, Roscommon County Road Commission, and Department of Natural Resources, Defendants-Appelle
State v. Plattpublic domain
496 S.W.2d 878 (1973) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Preston PLATT, Appellant. No. KCD 26497. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. June 4, 1973. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1973. *879 Robert G. Duncan, Duncan & Russell, Kansas City, for appellant. John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Vincent F. I
Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.public domain
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION
Animal Leg Def Fund v. Glickman, Danielpublic domain
154 F.3d 426 332 U.S.App.D.C. 104, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,202 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Appellees,v.Daniel R. GLICKMAN, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., andNational Association for Biomedical Research, Appellants. Nos. 97-5009, 97-5031 and 97-5074 United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued in