Cases

Pyle, Judge. Statement of the Case The Appellants/Plaintiffs, Robert K. Reinmiller Living Trust (“Reinmiller”) and Timothy and Paula Matthews (collectively, “the Matthews”), filed a complaint to challenge a legal survey completed on behalf of their neighbors, the Appellees/Defendants, Jeffrey L. and Karen Metschuleit (col

ROBERTS, C.J. The appellant/former husband seeks review of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and the subsequent denial of his motion for rehearing and/or reconsideration. The former husband argues that the trial court erred in failing to make the requisite findings to support its alimony award of $3,500 per month to the former wife, which he argues greatly exceeds the

Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs, two Republicans and one Libertarian, challenge the constitutionality of Massachusetts's system for allocating electors in presidential elections. The plaintiffs have voted and plan to continue voting in Massachusetts for presidential candidates who are not members of the Democratic Party. They allege that their

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, J. James Randall Baker (“Movant”) was convicted of statutory rape in the first degree following a jury trial. At trial, defense counsel raised an issue during the testimony of a doctor who testified for the State. Defense counsel argued that the witness was giving a false impression to the jury regarding “significant positive findings” whereas the only two positive findings, hymen transaction and eviden

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Mathew Baker (hereinafter "Baker") and Sontino and Lisa Williams (hereinafter collectively known as the "Williams"), appeal the judgment of the Union County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. {¶ 2} On March 9, 2007, plaintiff-appellee, CLN, LLC (hereinafter "CLN"), filed a complaint against Baker Carpentry and

(2008) Linda L. BAKER, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 6:07-339-KKC. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, at London. April 18, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Cross Motions for Summary Judgm

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge: Terry Dixon is serving a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for attempted murders committed while Dixon was under the influence of drugs and alcohol. After both his direct *717 appeal and his pro se state postconvic

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge. | ^Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the trial court granting exceptions of prescription filed by defendant, Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (“Citizens”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and we remand this matter for further proceedings to allow plaintiffs the opportunity to amend and supplement their petition within twenty-one days of t

INTRODUCTION SIRAGUSA, District Judge. This action alleging negligence and other related causes of action involves a gas drilling company that Plaintiffs allege has contaminated their residential water wells through its gas exploration in Chemung County, New York. The case was removed by Defendant Anschutz Exploration Corporation (“Anschutz”) and is now before the Court on Anschutz’s motions seeking an or

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0111p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ STEPHEN TED KOPROWSKI, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

Cite as 2025 Ark. 4 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered: January 8, 2025 ORDER OF CHIEF JUSTICE KAREN R. BAKER KAREN R. BAKER, Chief Justice Pursuant to Amendment 80 of the Arkansas Constitution, the Chief Justice is selected in the same manner as the other justices on the court—the people of Arkansas get to decide. See Ark. Const. amend. 80, § 2(A)-(B). The a

Justice Boyd, joined by Justice Johnson, dissenting in part. I do not agree with the Court’s answer to the Fifth Circuit’s second question, and instead conclude that the parties’ agreement expressly gives the borrower a contractual right to forfeiture of all principal and interest paid upon the lender’s “failure to correct [a] failure to comply” with its obligations under the loan. Though the Court is concern

MATHIAS, Judge. [1] Appellants-Defendants East Point Business Park¡ LLC (“East Point”), Field-view Properties, LLC, (“Fieldview”) and Karen Rusin- (“Rusin”) (collectively “the Defendants”) challenge the Lake Superior Courts grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff Private Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“PREH”), in PREH’s foreclosure action against the Defendants. </

PER CURIAM. We granted review of Baker v. State, 793 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), based upon the district court’s certification of conflict with the opinion in Lester v. State, 737 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, after further consideration, we decline to exercise our discretion to review this mat*294

ORDER PER CURIAM. Kent Baker (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an eviden-tiary hearing on some of the claims in his post-conviction motion. Movant claims his trial counsel denied him effective assistance of counsel by failing to: (1) effectively cross-examine and impeach the victim; (2) conduct a reas

OPINION OF THE COURT Dillon, J.P. By contract dated December 6, 2005, the respondent Village *183of Elmsford agreed to purchase from the respondent Brookfield Automotive Exporting Corp. (hereinafter Brookfield) a 30,060-square-foot parcel of property for the sum of $1,550,000. The property was located on Vreeland Avenue, was identified in the contr

103 S.W.3d 711 (2003) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary Lynn BAKER, Appellant. No. SC 84507. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. April 1, 2003. Rehearing Denied May 27, 2003. *713 Donald W. Petty, Liberty, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney Ge

Cite as 2014 Ark. 171 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-1050 GREGORY ROSS GILES, TERRI Opinion Delivered April 17, 2014 GILES, KAREN JEAN HUGHES, AND KEVIN HUGHES APPEAL FROM THE BOONE APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV-12-202-4] V.

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 117 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CR-20-314 2023.06.22 15:07:56 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: March 10, 2021 RODNEY L. BAKER

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Raulerson v. State, 763 So.2d 285 (Fla.2000). STONE, KLEIN, and GROSS, JJ., concur.