Cases

OPINION Ken Wise, Justice A Gulf War veteran sued a chemical manufacturer, alleging that during the Gulf War he suffered personal injuries as a result of exposure to mustard gas manufactured with a chemical precürsbr supplied by the- manufacturer. In response, the manufacturer filed a no-evidence summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted.’ On appeal, the primary issue concerns whether the vet

488 F.Supp.2d 889 (2007) FRIENDS OF the EARTH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert MOSBACHER, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. C 02-04106 JSW. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2007. *890 *891 Richard Roos-Collins, Natural Heritage Institute, San Francisco, CA, Ronald A. She

ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00173-COA CARLOS RONCALI A/K/A CARLOS JAMES APPELLANT RONCALI v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/20/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NEWTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTO

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Before this Court are two sets of lawsuits by plaintiffs asserting claims related to their investments in four feeder funds (the “Funds”) founded and óperated by the Fairfield -Greenwich Group (“FGG”).1 The Funds, in turn, invested heavily in Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”), which, as is now well k

^3,077-0' wm IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUG 0? 2015 WR 83,127-01 Ca.No.lO-CR-2388A EX PARTA § IN THE 28th DISTRI RANDY J.KAIZER

532 So.2d 943 (1988) STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of J.A. No. 88-KA-238. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 12, 1988. George E. Escher, New Orleans, for plaintiff/appellee. Janice L. Kazmier, Bureau of Legal Services, New Orleans, for DHHR—defendant/appellant. Before KLIEBERT, GRISBAUM and WICKER, JJ. WICKER, Judge. This a

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-155V Filed: November 2, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NICOLE MATTEN as parent and legal * PUBLISHED Representative of the Estate of her * Daughter, KM * *

ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. This action was initiated in May 2012 by the Native Village of Chickaloon, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Center for Biological Diversity, and the Center for Water Advocacy and challenges the National Marine Fisheries Service’s (“NMFS”) issuance of an “Incidental Harassment Authorization” that allowed Apache

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-250V (to be published) ************************* Chief Special Master Corcoran NEONA MARTIN, on behalf of the * ESTATE OF JOSEPH JAMES MARTIN, * * Filed: July 17,

1521 La SaJe-H-e 3h£*l•jfi ^ 2H PHeJiiMl H 4flj^a III^^^i-^usikZKia ~tf"7 fr CEE -^1 2kas^Je^kIZSIeji"^v\d eT ^ 3 •H-/OJ .^ ^ZVVjGj^j^l 5|_ IDa^vN\S_^j SSl^^keV53S^Iici/ r CPtUSB HO. $2546<8 CAUSE Mo. S2«^SC cause t^

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN RE: THE THIRTY-FIVE STATEWIDE : No. 175 MM 2014 INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY : : : PETITION OF: ATTORNEY GENERAL : KATHLEEN G. KANE : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day o

275 F.Supp.2d 1157 (2002) WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, and San Benito County Water District, Plaintiffs, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Northern California Power Association, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, et al., Defendants, Hoopa Valley Tribe, Defendant-Intervenor, Yurok Tribe, Defendant-Intervenor. N

COUfcT Of ItfPEfclS MUWiBER*.D3*lS-0&3«5-£tf September 18, 2015 a>utu of (We/as fdk toe rarRfl Disroir dp rais EDDIE. ItotfiJDHMSOtf c in rat coiLCtf" of&pfcM3 V- c third jxioicdu. OGniitf c THE STATt OF TEKA<; C ^XUHG W MbXlti, ftcAS RECEIVED^ Wa^t

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON REMAINING COUNTS OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT John E. Hoffman, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction When debtors commence Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, they become debtors in possession obligated to perform most of the duties of a trustee, including the duty to object to improper claims filed against the bankruptcy estate

ACCEPTED 04-14-00061-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 04-15-00061-CV SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/6/2015 3:33:46 PM

ACCEPTED 05-15-00861-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/16/2015 4:04:22 PM

IUJWcMAM&m; 14m Q&aw; §f, ^a^^^m ">•••;•••'. • ' •-.uKtifM;" 4JLL- i5~;oo*9<;-cr ,;-;,;.- .^^^^ '-,-7' • '..- I : - .' ***&?"«*« ,t : co^Utss' tock ian •CMw tiwft. tiNMEtfw&M;' Tft)fc QJM0J«r(LWO3 CJJZ^liJti. tito&MAlY-; CjQMfM/e t a

December 22, 2014 Justice Sharon Keller Presiding Judge Court of Criminal Appeals RECEIVED IN P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Austin, TX 78711 This document contains some JAN 0 5 Z015 RE: 03-13-00723CR D-1-DC-13-904021A pages that ar~ of p~or quality ""'"" A osta, Clerk at the t

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL