Cases

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN joined. Judge THACKER wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge: These habeas corpus proceedings on behalf of Justin Michael Wolfe are before us for the third time, and they arrive saddled with a protracted and eventful history. Most recently

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN MICHAEL WOLFE,  Petitioner-Appellee, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,  No. 12-7 Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson,

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I write with regard and appreciation for the majority’s disposition of Wolfe’s murder-for-hire and firearm convictions. I *427must, however, respectfully and narrowly dissent from its granting of habeas relief on the drug conspiracy conviction. The record, and, significantly, the majority does not directly refut

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

819 F.Supp.2d 574 (2011) Justin Michael WOLFE, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:05cv432. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. November 22, 2011. *576 Michele Jill Brace, Charlottesville, VA, Alan Dial, Washington, DC, for Petiti

819 F.Supp.2d 538 (2011) Justin Michael WOLFE, Petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,[1] Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:05cv432. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. July 26, 2011. *543 James Griffin, Alan Dial, Brian Meiners, King & Spalding, Washin

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By Decision and Order dated February 22, 2013 (“2013 Decision,” Dkt. No. 1052), the Court certified a class comprised of “all shareholders/limited partners in Fairfield Sentry Limited, Fairfield Sigma Limited, Greenwich Sentry, L.P. and Greenwich Sentry Partners L.P. (the ‘Funds’) as of December 10, 2008 who suffered a net loss of principal invest

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Plaintiff Joquina Teresa Barbachano Herrero (“Barbachano”) has requested leave to file an amended complaint (Docket No. 987) in Barbachano v. Standard Chartered Bank Int’l (Americas) Ltd., et al., 11 Civ. 3553, and has submitted a proposed amended complaint (Docket No. 990) (the “Amended Complaint”). Barbachano is one of eight separate actions filed

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By letter dated May 24, 2013, Defendants Standard Chartered Bank Interna*636tional (Americas) Ltd. (“SCBI”) sought a pre-motion conference to enforce this Court’s May 18, 2012 order, 863 F.Supp.2d 346 (S.D.N.Y.2012) (the “May 18 Order”) compelling Plaintiff Ricardo Rodriguez Caso (“Caso”

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. This suit for breach of contract is brought on behalf of a putative class of investors seeking to recover fees that defendants Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited and Standard Chartered Bank (collectively, “Defendants”) charged for managing investments in the Fairfield Sentry Limited fund (“Sentry Fund”). The Sentry Fund wa

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By letters dated May 29, 2012 (Docket No. 886) and July 13, 2012 (Docket No. 901), defendants PwC Canada and PwC Netherlands (together, the “PwC Defendants”) have requested a pre-motion conference to discuss the effect on the negligence-based claims in this case of two recent Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary orders, Stephenson v. Pri

816 A.2d 301 (2003) Daniel ADAMS, Thomas Allison, James Anderchin, Brian Anderson, James Anderson, Lawrence Anderson, Connie Ashurst, Kelly Atherton, Sr., Clark Baird, Brain Baker, Jason Ball, Joseph Barnosky, Thomas Bartlebaugh, Terry Bearer, Thomas Bearer, Bernice Berkey, Harry Berkey, Todd Berry, Christopher M. Bernard, Ricky Bertolino, Christopher Betsinger, Timothy Betts, Gerald Bills, Jason Bingaman, Daniel Bliss, Jeramie Blose, Kenneth Blystone, A

7 F.3d 971 126 Lab.Cas. P 33,037, 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 1109 Alton C. FRANKS, Joseph Osborne, Michael Tidwell, Terry LeeSteward, John Timko, Phillip Sparks, James Vaughn, FrederickGiles, Lance Foster, Robert Mohundro, Jesse Thomas, ChesterLyons, Billy Ray Walters, Harold Huntley, Robert Schneider,Timothy Clark, Jerry Hallmark, Kelvin Moore, Delfino Porras,Archie Rose, Darrell Allen, Geor

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the court’s result that Plaintiffs have standing to challenge the provisions at issue,1 that the Salt Lake County Clerk, Governor, and Attorney General were proper Defendants, and that the appeal may proceed despite the absence of the Salt Lake County Clerk. I disagree w

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of nine hours is *812allotted for oral argument. Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Richard A. Posner, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Cyril S. Wofsy for petitioner in No. 60. William T. Coleman, Jr., Robert W. Maris,