Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18–2497 JUSTIN FESSLER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant – Appellee. ------------------------------ METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; NORTH CAROLI

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed June 9, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00483-CR JUSTIN COOK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9

Case: 19-60087 Document: 00515247003 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/23/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-60087 FILED

ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., Chief Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 16), Plaintiffs Response, (Doc. No. 20), and the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M & R”), (Doc. No. 22), recommending that the Motion be granted. The parties were advised that objections to the M & R were to be filed by September 17, 2012. The

33 Cal.3d 739 (1983) 661 P.2d 1064 190 Cal. Rptr. 910 HARRY R. ROBERTS, a Judge of the Superior Court, Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, Respondent. Docket No. S.F. 24436. Supreme Court of California. April 25, 1983. *742 COUNSEL Arne Werchick, Justin A. Robe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court1 upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 142), filed on May 30, 2013. Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and applicable law, the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Justin Yarbro appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We conclude that Yarbro’s failure to object to the admission of DNA evidence during trial and in his motion for a new trial precludes him from raising arguments on appeal about t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Defendant. FINDING OF LIABILITY For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Specifically, the Court holds as follows: 1. As to Count I, defendant the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) is LIABLE to the following plaintiffs: (1) Steven Vernier, Jr.; (2

819 F.Supp.2d 192 (2011) Nicole TINNELL, Plaintiff, v. INVACARE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 10-CV-079A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 12, 2011. *194 Shelby, Bakshi & White, Justin S. White, of Counsel, Williamsville, NY, for Plaintiff. Haworth Coleman & Gerstman, LLC, Scott L. Haworth, and Nora C

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant/Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Law (Docket #.37) and Defendant/Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket #38). The Court is also in receipt of Magistrate Judge Mona K. M

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NIKOLA SOBOT, Plaintiffs, Case No. 22-cv-1846-TSC-MJS v. CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC., Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION After his employment termination from Clean the World Foundation Inc. (“CTWF”), Plaintiff Nikola Sobot (“Sobot”) clai

GOLDEN, Justice. [T1] This appeal presents a question of first impression whether a criminal defendant's judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty to the felony of third degree sexual abuse of a minor must be set aside and he be permitted to plead anew because the district court failed to comply with Wyo. Stat. Arn. § 7-11-507 which states: (a) No judgment of conviction shall be entered upon

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The matter is presently before the Court upon the Order and Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #50), Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint (Doc. #35), and Plaintiffs Motion for Order for Oral Arguments on Defendant’s Motion for

OPINION AND ORDER HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffery Pearson’s (“Plaintiff”) Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Magistrate Judge”). Doc. 17. For the reasons explained below, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections after a de novo review and, finding no clear error in t

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiff Pearl River Union Free School District (“Plaintiff’) brings this Action against Defendants Arne Duncan, as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, and the United States Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that OCR’s issuance of a Letter of Findings s

360 F.Supp.2d 146 (2005) Justin ORWAT, Plaintiff, v. Michael T. MALONEY, etc., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.2002-10409-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 10, 2005. *147 *148 *149 Gregory A Connly, Dolan, Connly & Flaherty, PC

ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Report And Recommendation (DE 99), filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt, Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 73), and Plaintiffs’ Objections To Report And Recommendation As To Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 103). The Court has conducted a de novo review of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring a nationwide wage-and-hour collective action, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and nine state-specific class actions, with each class alleging violations of the labor and/or the unfair *469competition laws of Californ

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff David Swafford ("Swafford") brings the instant lawsuit against Defendant International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM"). Before the Court is IBM's motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Having considered the parties' briefs, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part with prejudice, GRANTS in part without prejudice, and DENIES in part IBM's moti

621 F.Supp.2d 1074 (2007) George H. SAENZ, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant. No. CV 05-1206-PK. United States District Court, D. Oregon. August 15, 2007. *1076 Michael C. Baxter, Justin M. Baxter, Baxter & Baxter, LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff. *1077 Donald E. Bradley, S