Cases

ORDER The court’s opinion filed January 5, 2011, slip op. 403, and appearing at 2011 WL 13922 (9th Cir.2011), is hereby amended as follows: 1. On page 406, line 8, delete ‘We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we dismiss the appeal because Lakey’s habeas petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (1996).” Replace that text with We ha

633 F.3d 782 (2011) Derrick LAKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roderick HICKMAN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 09-15940. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 15, 2010. Filed January 5, 2011. Amended February 10, 2011. *783 Mark David Greenberg, Oakland, CA, for pe

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Justin Lee ) Docket No. 2016-06-0912 ) v. ) State File No. 70538-2015 ) Western Plastics, et al. ) ) ) Appeal fr

996 A.2d 974 (2010) 193 Md. App. 238 Brian Anthony HICKMAN v. STATE of Maryland. No. 882, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 3, 2010. *975 Robert H. Harvey, Jr. of Prince Frederick, MD, for appellant. Carrie J. Williams (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on the brief) Bal

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-KA-00214-COA JUSTYN MATTHEW SCHLEGEL A/K/A APPELLANT JUSTYN SCHLEGEL v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER A. COLLINS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 4, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN GENEL HILL Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. 0-201 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge No. W2001-01274-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 19, 2003 An Obion County grand jury indicted the defenda

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jan 29 2015, 10:02 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Matthew D. Anglemeyer Gregory

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND; No. 15-35960 PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC; D.C. No. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION 1:14-cv-00104- OF IDAHO; CENTER FOR FOOD BLW SAFETY; FARM SANCTUARY; RIVER’S WISH ANIMAL SANCTUARY; WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT; OPINION SANDPOINT VEGETARIANS; IDAHO CONCERNED AREA RESIDENTS FOR THE EN

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 02 2018, 5:52 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

Cite as 2020 Ark. 162 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered April 23, 2020 IN RE SUSPENSION OF ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2020 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2020 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2020. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an au

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a motion to intervene filed by the Idaho Dairymen’s Association, Inc. (the “IDA”) (Dkt. 16). The motion is fully briefed and at issue. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will deny the motion and not allow the applicants to intervene. BACKGROUND Th

79 P.3d 599 (2003) GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Raymond CARPENTER, a minor, through his natural mother, Dorothy REED, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. S-9774, S-9843. Supreme Court of Alaska. October 24, 2003. *601 Paul D. Stockler, Anchorage, and William R. Hickman, Earl M. Sutherland, Reed McClur

DATE: 08/05/2014 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:36:36 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312013 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED ______________________________________________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47037 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, December 2020 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: February 10, 2021 CARLI JOANN CAMPBELL,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47037 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, December 2020 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: February 10, 2021 CARLI JOANN CAMPBELL,

*1014MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Animal Legal Defense Fund, as well as various other organizations and individuals,1 (collectively, “ALDF”), challenges section 18-7042 of the Idaho Code as unconstitutional. The State defendants, Governor Butch Otter a

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 454 Emma Jean Jenkins, in her capacity as personal representative and administratrix of the estate of Belinda Denise Hodge, filed this action against numerous defendants, including Jefferson County Sheriff Mike Hale, whom she sued individually and in his official capacity. During the course of the litigation, Je

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Blaine Flinders and David Brown, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, (referred to collectively as “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Workforce Stabilization Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (“WFSP” or “the Plan”). Plaintiffs as

ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the United States of America’s Ob*1311jections To The Magistrate Judge’s .Order Granting Motion For Clarification And Denying- Motion For Reconsideration (DE 384). The Court has carefully reviewed said Objections, the entire court file and is ot

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SQUATRITO, District Judge. Now pending in the above-captioned matter is plaintiffs’ third motion to compel (dkt.# 201) discovery from defendants. For the reasons set forth herein, this motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Lead plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of members of a p