Cases

APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. JUSTIN PAGE Docket: 24-P-298 Dates: February 5, 2025 – May 13, 2025 Present: Blake, C.J.,

#30317, #30338-r-JMK 2024 S.D. 48 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** #30317 BETTY JEAN STROM TRUST, RITA BROWN, and CRAIG AND LISA BASLER FAMILY TRUST, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SCS CARBON TRANSPORT, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, a/k/a SUMMIT CARBON SOLUTIONS, Defend

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MATTHEW HOWELL; ALISHA BROWN, │ Plaintiffs-

566 F.Supp.2d 970 (2008) WWP, INC., Plaintiff, v. WOUNDED WARRIORS, INC., Defendant. No. 8:07CV370. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. July 14, 2008. *973 Amber A. Furbee, Suzanne M. Shehan, Thomas J. Kenny, Kutak, Rock Law Firm, Omaha, NE, Errol Copilevitz, Copilevitz, Canter Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff.

OPINION OF THE COURT COVELLO, J. In this Family Court proceeding, a child’s birth mother seeks to have another female, lacking legal ties to her, and lacking biological and legal ties to the child, adjudicated a parent of the child and required to pay child support. The question presented for our consideration is whether the Family Court has subject matter jurisdiction to entertain such an application. Be

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge. The matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 316 and 321).1 This is a class action for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of" 1938 and Nebraska wage and hour laws. After reviewing the briefs, evidentiary record, and applicable law, the Court finds as follows.<

ERDMANN, Judge (dissenting in part and concurring in the result): As I cannot agree with the majority’s interpretation of Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931), and the impact of that decision on United States v. Barberi, 71 M.J. 127 (C.A.A.F.2012), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion. However, as

PER CURIAM. Defendant pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC-I), MCL 750.520b(l)(c), and first-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(3). This Court vacated his original sentences for reasons not germane to this appeal, and new sentences were imposed. Neither the first nor the second CSC-I sentence included a provision for lifetime electronic monitoring as required under MCL 750.520b(2)(d).1

OPINION OF THE COURT WIEDIE, Judge: The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of knowing and wrongful possession of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; knowing and wrongful receipt of visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct; enticing a minor chil

555 F.3d 1331 (2009) AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. SCHOENTHAL FAMILY, LLC, Liberty One Funding Trust, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants Cross-Appellees. No. 08-10749. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 30, 2009. *1335 Charles K. McKni

ORDER AND JUDGMENT PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that [187] the motion for final approval of the proposed class settlement is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that [179] the consent motion to approve appointment of the Track A and Track B neutral is GRANTED; it is

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket Nos. 47858/47859 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: August 30, 2021 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) JEREMY MICHEAL PORTER,

806 F.Supp.2d 138 (2011) In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION. This document relates to: All Cases. Misc. No. 08-0511 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 26, 2011. Alphonso Michael Espy, Mike Espy, PLLC, Jackson, MS, Andrew H. Marks, David E. Bell, Laurel Pyke Malson, Michael Wyld Lieberman, Crowell & Moring LLP, Anurag Varma,

*178 PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals as of right his bench trial convictions of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC-I), MCL 750.520b(l)(a), and two counts of failing to comply with the Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA), MCL 28.721 et seq., MCL 28.729. The trial court sentenced him

PER CURIAM. Defendant Jack O. Morley appeals as of right the final order of the circuit court granting *308judgment in favor of plaintiff, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). We affirm. The DEQ filed a complaint against defendant, seeking an injunction and civil fines for defendant’s dredging, filling, draining, and maintaining a us

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4687 Doc: 41 Filed: 06/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4687 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEXANDER HILLEL TREISMAN, a/k/a Alexander S. Theiss,

720 F.Supp.2d 671 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. John UNDERWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENENTECH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-3983. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 2, 2010. *672 Elizabeth K. Ainslie, H. Justin Park, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of named plaintiffs James Copeland, Earl Moorer, and Marshallene McNeil (“the Moving Plaintiffs”) for final certification of a plaintiffs’ class and approval of a settlement agreement that would resolve the pending claims of approximately 40,000 plaintiffs and compensate thousands of victims of race discriminat

RULING AND ORDER Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge , Plaintiff brings this action against her former employer alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-60(a)(l), violations of the Equal Pay-Act and failure to pay commissions in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § Sl-Nla.1 Defendants have moved for summary judgmen

820 F.Supp.2d 78 (2011) In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION. This document relates to All Cases. Misc. No. 08-0511 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 27, 2011. Dedrick Brittenum, Jr., Memphis, TN, Precious T. Martin, Sr., Precious Martin, *79 Sr. & Associates, PLLC, Jackson, MS, for Black