Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Justin J. Marvin”
407 F.3d 198 Jerry Wayne CONNER, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Marvin POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee. No. 04-23. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: February 1, 2005. Decided: May 3, 2005. ARGUED: Kenneth Justin Rose, Center For Death
Judgment rendered January 11, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. ***** ON REMAND ***** No. 54,230-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND C
Judgment rendered April 13, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,230-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Matter of Andrea H. v. Justin I.public domain
Matter of Andrea H. v Justin I. (2022 NY Slip Op 01080) Matter of Andrea H. v Justin I. 2022 NY Slip Op 01080 Decided on February 17, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B
State of Tennessee v. Marvin Stinnettpublic domain
02/12/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 4, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARVIN STINNETT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 17-05992 Jennifer Johnson Mitchell, Judge ___________________________________
Marvin Christopher Long v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
11/17/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 29, 2020 at Knoxville MARVIN CHRISTOPHER LONG v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2008-D-3274 Monte Watkins, Judge No. M2019-02064-CCA-R3-PC The
Marvin Miranda v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1828 MARVIN DUBON MIRANDA; AJIBADE THOMPSON ADEGOKE; JOSE DE LA CRUZ ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Du
Marvin Miranda v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1828 MARVIN DUBON MIRANDA; AJIBADE THOMPSON ADEGOKE; JOSE DE LA CRUZ ESPINOZA, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary; MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Du
Justin Gerome Horn v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 06-17-00226-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS
In re Guardianship of Tomas J.public domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/28/2025 09:11 AM CST - 503 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF TOMAS J. Cite as 318 Neb. 503 In re Guardianship of Tomas J., a mi
Marvin E. Hart v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 08 2019, 9:44 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Ap
Curtis Marvin McKinney v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00345-CR CURTIS MARVIN MCKINNEY APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
State of Tennessee v. Justin Hadleypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 14, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN HADLEY Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-06564 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2014-00985-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 21, 2015 A Shelby County Criminal Court Jury convicted the appellant, Justin Hadley, of theft of proper
Plott v. Justin Enterprisespublic domain
374 S.C. 504 (2007) 649 S.E.2d 92 Peter C. PLOTT and Demitria C. Votta, Respondents, v. JUSTIN ENTERPRISES, a South Carolina General Partnership, Russ Pye, and Lee Pye, Appellants. No. 4258. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 7, 2007. Decided June 18, 2007. Rehearing Denied August 24, 2007.
Curtis Marvin McKinney v. Statepublic domain
02-10-345-CR
Justin Industries, Inc. v. Choctaw Securities, L.P.public domain
PER CURIAM: I. Sutherland Lumber-Southwest, Inc. (Sutherland), is seeking to acquire Justin Industries, Inc. (Justin), in a hostile takeover. As part of its takeover defense, Justin adopted a supermajority provision in its bylaws that made it difficult to remove its directors. Justin failed to disclose its amendments in several filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), in violation of the
Ballard v. Johnspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Marvin Ballard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1
Marvin Hester v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Sep 17 2015, 9:02 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Douglas R. Long Gregory F. Zoeller Anderson, Indiana
State v. Greenpublic domain
MOORE, J. | ]The defendant, Justin Keith Green, was convicted of the computer-aided solicitation of a minor, in violation of La. R.S. 14:81.3. He was sentenced to serve 10 years’ imprisonment at hard labor, without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The defendant appealed, urging three assignments of error. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS The victim’
Ballard v. Johnspublic domain
ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or, in the alternative, for summary judgment [DE #85]. Plaintiff has responded, albeit it out of time1, to the motion. Also before the court is plaintiffs motion for an order overruling defendants’ objections to certain document productio