Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Julius Valley Burris”
Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Districtpublic domain
*1164 OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: In the early morning hours of January 1, 2009, on a train platform in Oakland, an encounter between a group of young men and several officers of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (“BART”) police ended with the shooting and death of Oscar Grant III
Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transitpublic domain
790 F.Supp.2d 1034 (2011) Wanda JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, et al., Defendants. No. CV 09-00901 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 10, 2011. *1040 John L. Burris, Adante Pointer, Law Offices of John L. Burris, Jeshawna Rochea Harrell, Pamela Yvette Price, Price & Associates, Oa
City of Burlington v. Daguepublic domain
505 U.S. 557 (1992) CITY OF BURLINGTON v. DAGUE et al. No. 91-810. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 21, 1992. Decided June 24, 1992. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *558 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Kennedy,
Flanzbaum v. M & M Transportation Co.public domain
DOOLING, District Judge. Plaintiff shipper sues in the right of an alleged initial common carrier to recover against an alleged connecting carrier under the Carmack Amendment (49 U.S.C.A. §§ 20(12), 319) for the amount of damages the initial carrier was required to pay the plaintiff shipper for injuries to the shipper’s goods allegedly sustained on the line of the connecting carrier. The facts, separately found, are plain.
In Re Middle West Utilities Co.public domain
17 F.Supp. 359 (1936) In re MIDDLE WEST UTILITIES CO. No. 49923. District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. September 29, 1936. On Rehearing December 4, 1936. *360 *361 *362 *363 *364