Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Julie Ann Cramer”
Wright v. Cramerpublic domain
WELBAUM, P.J. {¶ 1} In this case, Defendant-Appellant, Russell Cramer, appeals from a judgment and decree of divorce. In a single assignment of error, Cramer contends that the trial court erred in determining the nature of, and dividing, property. Plaintiff-Appellee, Tammy Wright, filed a notice of cross-appeal but subsequently dismissed her cross-appeal. As a result, only Cramer's appe
Cantlin v. Smythe Cramer Co.public domain
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.: {¶ 1} Smythe Cramer Co., d.b.a. Howard Hanna Smythe Cramer ("HHSC"), appeals from the trial court's granting plaintiffs Rita Noall, Cindy Miller, Patrick Cantlin, and Elizabeth Hong's ("Plaintiffs") motion for class certification in this fraud and unjust enrichment case and assigns the following error for our review: I. The tria
Cramer v. Zgelapublic domain
¶ 1 Derrick R. Cramer, Sr. (Appellant) appeals pro se from the order dated June 26, 2008, that denied his request for visitation with his minor son (D.O.B.3/30/01) at SCI-Huntingdon, where Appellant is serving a life sentence for first degree murder. We vacate and remand. ¶ 2 In its opinion filed pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a), the trial court set forth the following factual and procedural background of this case: Father . . . filed a complaint for
Cramer v. Village of Oakleypublic domain
BOONSTRA, J. In this action under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq., defendant village of Oakley appeals by right the order of the trial *62 court granting plaintiff Brandi Cramer’s motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) (no genuine issue of materia
Bradford v. Cramerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT (March 18, 2011) Hodge, C.J. Barry Bradford appeals an August 11, 2009 Family Court Order requiring Bradford to pay Gayle Cramer $6,000 for the parties’ credit card debts, $1,300 per month for child support, and $1,500 for alimony. Bradford also challenges the Family Court’s order requiring him to provide a home free of rental charges for Cramer and the parties’ minor
Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.public domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/23/2026 08:07 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel
Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.public domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/01/2026 01:12 AM CDT - 246 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports CRAMER v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. Cite as 321 Neb. 246 Chaylea Cramer, appellee and cross-appel
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra
Cramer v. Bobulapublic domain
[Cite as Cramer v. Bobula, 2026-Ohio-2538.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA MARILYN A. CRAMER, FKA BOBULA, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 115447 v. : GEORGE BOBULA, : Defenda
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED CHRISTOPHER FRANKLIN, April 25, 2019 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Claimant Below, Petitioner SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
People v. Cramer-Williamspublic domain
People v Cramer-Williams (2026 NY Slip Op 01665) People v Cramer-Williams 2026 NY Slip Op 01665 Decided on March 20, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion
In re Cramerpublic domain
Per Curiam: This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Megan Jennifer Cramer, an attorney of Kansas City, Missouri, who has heretofore been admitted to practice law in the State of Kansas. Respondent’s last registration address filed with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts of Kansas is in Kansas City, Missouri. The complaint filed again
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge Tom Leiter induced the Plaintiffs— friends and others familiar with his development experience—to invest $1.1 million in Palm Avenue Partners to develop a high-rise condominium project. But the evidence at trial showed that Leiter failed to disclose to the Plaintiffs that he was using the $1.1 million he ra
Cramer v. Superior Courtpublic domain
29 Cal.Rptr.3d 673 (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 42 Gary CRAMER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. B176464. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five. June 9, 2005. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 6, 2005. Review Denied August 24,
Cramer v. Englertpublic domain
Carpinello, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered July 24, 1998 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. At issue on appeal is the alleged malpractice of attorneys (defendants) who were hired to sue other attorneys for legal malpractice and breach of contract. Although the question of the alleged malpractic
Ferguson v. Cramerpublic domain
709 A.2d 1279 (1998) 349 Md. 760 Kimberly Ann FERGUSON et al. v. Steven J. CRAMER et al. No. 82, Sept. Term, 1997. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 21, 1998. *1280 Christopher M. Johns, Germantown, for petitioners. Kathleen Howard Meredith (Stephen Y. Brennan, Iliff & Meredith P.C., Charles Mar
Ferguson v. Cramerpublic domain
695 A.2d 603 (1997) 116 Md. App. 99 Kimberly Ann FERGUSON, et al., v. Steven J. CRAMER, et al. No. 1316, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 26, 1997. Christopher M. Johns, German town, for Appellants. Stephan Y. Brennan (Kathleen Howard Meredith and Lliff & Meredith, P.C., on the brief), Baltimore, for app
Thomas Lynn Cramer v. Secretary, Dept. of Corr.public domain
PER CURIAM: Thomas Lynn Cramer, a Florida prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 2254 petition as time-barred. Cramer filed his petition after the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”); Pub.L. No. 104-32, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), and, therefore, the
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Smythe, Cramer Co.public domain
265 F.Supp.2d 882 (2003) RE/MAX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. SMYTHE, CRAMER COMPANY, Defendant. No. 1.03-CV-040. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 20, 2003. *884 Mark J. Andreini, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, for Re/Max International, Inc., (pla). Daniel H. Bromberg, Jones D
Heights Community Congress v. Smythe, Cramer Co.public domain
862 F.Supp. 204 (1994) HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CONGRESS, Plaintiff, v. SMYTHE, CRAMER CO., et al., Defendants, v. La Marr ANTHONY, et al., Third-party Defendants. No. 1:93-CV-994. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 23, 1994. *205 Glenn E. Billington, Charlett Bundy, Cleveland Heights, OH, for plai