Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Juliana v. United States of America”
Juliana v. United Statespublic domain
Ann Aiken, United States District Judge1 In this civil rights action, plaintiffs-a group of young people who were between the ages of eight and nineteen when this lawsuit was filed; Earth Guardians, a nonprofit association of young environmental activists; and Dr. James Hansen, acting as guardian for plaintiff "future generations"-allege that the federal government is violating their rights under the Fif
Juliana v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Aiken, Judge:1 Plaintiffs in this civil rights action are a group of young people between the ages of eight and nineteen (“youth plaintiffs”); Earth Guardians, an association of young environmental activists; and Dr. James Hansen, acting as guardian for future generations.2 Plaintiffs filed this action against defendants the United S
United States v. Juliana M. Cassilianopublic domain
KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendant Juliana M. Cassiliano appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York following her plea of guilty before Lawrence E. Kahn, Judge, convicting her of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1994), sentencing her principally to a prison term of 12 months and one day,
Kelsey Rose Juliana v. United Statespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA; No. 18-36082 XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske- D.C. No. Martinez; ALEXANDER LOZNAK; 6:15-cv-01517- JACOB LEBEL; ZEALAND B., through AA his Guardian Kimberly Pash-Bell; AVERY M., through her Guardian Holly McRae; SAHARA V., through ORDER her Guardian Toa Aguilar; KIRAN ISAAC OOMMEN; TIA MARIE HATTO
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-3300 JULIANA MARTIREZ ARREAGA BRAVO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Agency No. A209-004-970) Present: GREENAWAY JR., Circuit Judge _________________________________ORDER________________________________ The Court will iss
Kelsey Rose Juliana v. United Statespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA; No. 18-36082 XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske- D.C. No. Martinez; ALEXANDER LOZNAK; 6:15-cv-01517- JACOB LEBEL; ZEALAND B., through AA his Guardian Kimberly Pash-Bell; AVERY M., through her Guardian Holly McRae; SAHARA V., through OPINION her Guardian Toa Aguilar; KIRAN I SAAC OOMMEN; TIA MARIE HATTON;
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-3300 JULIANA MARTIREZ ARREAGA BRAVO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Agency No. A209-004-970) Present: MCKEE, GREENAWAY, JR., and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges 1. Unopposed Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General Unit
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-3300 ______________ JULIANA MARTIREZ ARREAGA BRAVO, Petitioner v. A
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-3300 ______________ JULIANA MARTIREZ ARREAGA BRAVO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ______________ On Petition for Review of a Decision And Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-3300 ______________ JULIANA MARTIREZ ARREAGA BRAVO, Petitioner v. A
PER CURIAM. *1104In this petition for a writ of mandamus, the government asks us for the second time to direct the district court to dismiss a case seeking various environmental remedies, or, in the alternative, to stay all discovery and trial. We denied the government's first mandamus petition, concluding that it had not met the high bar
THOMAS, Chief Judge: *833In this petition for a writ of mandamus, the defendants ask us to direct the district court to dismiss a case seeking various environmental remedies. The defendants argue that allowing the case to proceed will result in burdensome discovery obligations on the federal government that will threaten the separation of pow
United States v. Julie Grantpublic domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: D'efendanh-Appellant Julie Grant was charged with four counts of making false statements under penalty of perjury in a bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(3). She moved to dismiss Counts Two and Four of the indictment for failure to state an offense. The district court denied the motion. At trial, the jury found Defendant gu
*158 JAMES M. BURNS, Senior District Judge: Pitner and Hanson appeal their convictions and sentences. Both defendants contend the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury properly regarding knowledge and willfulness, mens rea elements of the crimes for which they were convi
University of Texas System Ex Rel. University of Texas Medical Foundation v. United Statespublic domain
HAYNES, Circuit Judge: The University of Texas System, on behalf of several of its subsidiary medical institutions (collectively “UT”), sued the United States seeking refund of the Social Security component of Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes it paid with respect to the service of medical residents in 2005. UT asserted that the residents were exempt from Social Security
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Juliana Rodriguez Morel v. Case No. 22-cv-00200-PB Opinion No. 2025 DNH 027 The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This insurance declaratory judgment action stems from an underlying lawsuit in which the plaintiff, Juliana Rodriguez Mo
United States v. Cernapublic domain
633 F.Supp.2d 1053 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ivan CERNA, et al., Defendants. No. CR 08-0730 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 26, 2009. *1054 Wai Shun Wilson Leung, United States Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. Christopher J. Cannon, Sugarman & Cannon, El
United States v. Mendezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Marcus Mendez appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirm. Mendez argues that the government failed to satisfy the jurisdictional element of § 922(g)(1). He asserts that the firearm’s movement in interstate commerce eight years prior to Mendez’s possession of it is an insufficient connection to inter
461 F.2d 1240 18 A.L.R.Fed. 890, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 154 Patrocinia L. Vda De RODULFA,v.UNITED STATES of America and Administrator of VeteransAffairs, Appellants.Juliana Caparas Vda del Rosariov.UNITED STATES of America and Donald E. Johnson,Administrator of Veterans Affairs, Appellants. Nos. 22947, 23000. United States Court of Appeals,Dist
103 F.3d 902 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9440, 96 Daily JournalD.A.R. 15,493UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.$46,588.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY AND $20.00 IN CANADIAN CURRENCY,more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, Defendant,Juliana Miriam Steernberg, Claimant-Appellant. No. 94-35478. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and