Cases

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00410-CR VALERIE ANN GIBSON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 100th District Court Childres

464 A.2d 752 (1983) In re JUDY ANN'S INC., d/b/a The Loco-Motion. No. 82-301. Supreme Court of Vermont. June 27, 1983. *753 Niquette, Niquette & Associates, Winooski, for appellant. Richard C. Whittlesey of McNeil, Murray & Sorrell, Inc., Burlington, for appellee. Before BILLINGS, C.J., and HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. While I agree with the majority’s discussion of the underlying precepts of the First Amendment, I continue to believe that the record supports a conclusion that the university did not create a limited public forum for the reasons outlined in the prior panel’s vacated opinion. Kincaid v. Gibson, 191 F.3d 719, 728-29 (6th Cir.1999). Assuming that the Thorobre

NORRIS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which RYAN, J., joined. COLE, J. (pp. 730-32), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Charles Kincaid and Capri Coffer challenge Kentucky State University (“KSU”) officials’ ban on the distribution of KSU’s 1992-94 yearbook and the officials’ alleged att

DOYLE, Presiding Judge. Shannon Lee Floyd (“the father”) appeals the superior court’s denial of his motion for new trial following the entry of a final order awarding custody of his children to Sherry Anne Gibson, the children’s maternal grandmother (“the grandmother”). Floyd argues that the trial court applied the incorrect standard and that the evidence did not support the court’s custody determination. For the reasons that

Peterson, Judge. This is the second time this child custody case has come before us. The first time, the trial court’s order awarding custody of the children to their maternal grandmother instead of their father left us unsure whether the trial court had made all of the required findings and considered all of the applicable factors. We vacated the order and remanded for the trial court to consider all the factors and make ex

287 S.C. 315 (1985) 338 S.E.2d 330 Emmett Lee GIBSON, Jr., Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Emmett Lee Gibson, Appellant, v. Ann G. BELCHER and Judy G. Devine, Individually and as Attorney in Fact for Fannie McLeod Gibson, Respondents. 22430 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard November 5, 1985. Decided December 17, 1985.<

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned March 25, 2015 JAMES R. COTHAM v. JUDY P. COTHAM Interlocutory Appeal from the Chancery Court for Decatur County No. 4007 Carma Dennis McGee, Chancellor No. W2015-00521-COA-T10B-CV – Filed March 30, 2015 This is a Rule 10B appeal of the denial of a petition for recusal. Appellant supported the Chancel

208 P.3d 543 (2009) 2009 UT App 108 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Judy GIBSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20080296-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 23, 2009. *544 Linda M. Jones, Gretchen Havner, and C. Bevan Corry, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Jeanne B. Inou

372 So.2d 829 (1979) Phyllis EVERAGE v. Mattie Lee GIBSON et al. 77-656. Supreme Court of Alabama. June 1, 1979. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1979. *830 Judy W. Hammond and William M. Hammond, Troy, for appellant. Robert W. Barr of Gibson & Barr, Troy, for appellees Willie Anne Golden, Billy Lamar Gibson a

Cite as 2026 Ark. 42 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-25-562 Opinion Delivered: March 5, 2026 REBECCA NICHOLS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-18-00264-CV CARROLL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant V. NORTHWEST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOSH WRIGHT, MARK SCHLUTER, STEVE SPROWLS, JUDY COPP, ANN DAVIS-SIMPSON, LILLIAN RAUCH, AND RYDER WARREN, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES ONLY, Appellees On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141-210251-05 Before Sudderth, C.J.; and Bassel, J. Memorandum Opini

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

DICKINSON, Presiding Justice," for the Court: ¶ 1. Bobby Leon Gibson (“Bobby”) filed a legal-malpractice action against Joe Montgomery and his law firm, Williams, Williams and Montgomery, P.A. (“WWM”), alleging wrongful conduct in connection with the administration of his late wife’s estate. The trial judge granted summary judgment to Montgomery and WWM. We

OPINION Opinion by Justice PERKES. This is an oil and gas case. 1 Appellants, David Ohrt, Sandra Hester and Judy Si-nast (collectively “appellants” or “Ohrts”), the lessors of an oil and gas lease, brought suit against appellees, Union Gas Corporation (the lessee) (“Union Ga

800 P.2d 1011 (1990) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ex rel. Erna I. GIBSON, Petitioner, v. Robert Warren GIBSON, Respondent. No. 14344. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii. November 9, 1990. Certiorari Denied December 27, 1990. *1012 Robert Warren Gibson, Kula, pro se. G. Cher Foerster, Deputy Atty. Gen. (with h

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987). SHARP, W., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See State v. Reyes, 680 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). PETERSON, ORFINGER and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

hart v. reyes IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-93-160-CV JUDY HART,

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See A.B.G. v. State, 586 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). PETERSON, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.