Cases

PER CURIAM. J.D.A. (“the husband”) appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court that, among other things, divorced him from A.B.A. (“the wife”); divided the marital assets; awarded the wife periodic alimony; required the husband to pay child support for the parties’ two minor *606children and postminority educational support for all three of the parties’ ch

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Clark, J.), dated December 19, 2002, which granted the motion of the Administration for Children’s Services to dismiss the petition for custody of her niece, and dismissed the petition. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reviewed the reco

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 452 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS integrity of this document DIVISION I 2023.07.19 10:55:41 -05'00' No. CV-20-442 2023.003.20244 JAMES WILLIS SUTTON, JR.; OPINION DELIVERED NOVEMBER 17, 2021 HOMER WILLIS; AND LOUIS WILLIS, EACH IN HIS OWN APPEAL FROM THE SEVIER RESPECTI

310 F.Supp.2d 727 (2004) Judy M. TAYLOR, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Tarek D. Myrick Plaintiff v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, John Doe Manufacturing, Inc. Defendants No. 00-CV-4506. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 23, 2004. *728 L. Noel Patterson, R. Jack Clapp & Ass

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Judy Portis sued her employer, the First National Bank of New Albany, Mississippi (“FNB”), after FNB demoted her from loan officer to a bookkeeping position. She alleged that her demotion constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1988) (“Title VII”). The district court granted F

30 S.W.3d 707 (2000) 342 Ark. 632 Harris J. BUCHBINDER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara D. Blaisdell, Lyle B. Thompson, and Barbara Laney and David Thompson v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Trustee of the Trust Agreement of N.B. Dalton. No. 99-1450. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 9, 2000. *708</

*964 ADELMAN, District Judge. Myrick Powers and Elvie Owens-Powers filed a petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. After the bankruptcy court confirmed their plan, the Chapter 13 trustee filed a motion to modify the plan to increase the debtors’ payments to the general unsecured creditors. The

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-06-00256-CV MCI SALES AND SERVICE, INC., F/K/A HAUSMAN BUS SALES, INC., AND MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V., F/K/A DINA AUTOBUSES, S.A. DE C.V., Appellants v. JAMES HINTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DOLORES HINTON, DECEASED, ET AL.,

216 Submitted November 19; reversed and remanded for reconsideration of petitioner’s Church motion, otherwise affirmed December 11, 2019; petition for review denied April 9, 2020 (366 Or 292) LARRY LYDELL BELL, SR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kimberly HENDRICKS, Superintendent, Santiam Cor

PER CURIAM. The Florida Department of Revenue seeks certiorari review of an order directing respondent Gary L. Ceasar and a non-party,. adult child, to submit to genetic testing. Mr. Ceasar did not respond to the show cause orders entered by this court directing him to respond to the Department’s petition. And now, upon consideration of the merits in the absence of a response, w

Judy T. McClellan ("the wife") appeals a judgment divorcing her from James E. McClellan ("the husband") insofar as it divided the parties' marital property and failed either to award her periodic alimony or to reserve the right to award her periodic alimony at a later date if the circumstances should justify it. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. In pertinent part, the divorce judgment states: "The parties were married in 1984 and subsequently d

MOORE, Judge, concurring in the result. On November 30, 2007, James Patterson (“the employee”) received various personal injuries in an automobile accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with TRA Transportation (“the employer”). The accident occurred in Michigan, but the employer paid the employee workers’ compensation benefits under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act (“the Act”),

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-01276-COA STACY SINQUEFIELD APPELLANT v. THE CITY OF RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/01/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. STEVE S. RATCLIFF III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTOR

JUSTICE THOMAS, dissenting: The majority reverses defendant’s conviction and remands for a new trial on the ground that the trial court’s in limine ruling constituted prejudicial error. Because I believe that any error was, at most, harmless error, I dissent from the majority opinion. In contrast

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and oral argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of th

487 S.E.2d 135 (1997) 226 Ga. App. 591 MURRAY et al. v. SANFORD. No. A97A0382. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 29, 1997. *136 Barrow, Sims, Morrow & Lee, A. Mark Lee, Christine J. Bedingfield, Savannah, for appellants. Savage & Turner, Robert B. Turner, Russell M. Stookey, Savannah, for app

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

452 Pa. Superior Ct. 135 (1996) 681 A.2d 746 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Judy Ann SHOWERS, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 25, 1996. Filed June 20, 1996. *140 William Costopoulos, Lemoyne, for appellant. Anthony J. Rosini, Assistant District Attorney, Shamokin,

The petitioners, Masonite Corporation and International Paper Company, raise two issues in their mandamus petition and their motion to stay the trial proceedings: 1) whether the trial court erred in certifying a national class action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3), Ala. R. Civ. P., and 2) whether the trial judge erred in refusing to recuse, in light of the petitioners' allegations that the trial judge and counsel for the plaintiffs engaged in improper ex parte communicatio

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor