Cases

562 N.W.2d 690 (1997) Judith L. MEYER, et al., Appellants, v. BEST WESTERN SEVILLE PLAZA HOTEL, et al., Respondents. No. C6-96-1958. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 29, 1997. Review Denied June 26, 1997. *691 Donald H. Nichols, Paul J. Lukas, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellants. <

768 N.W.2d 399 (2009) RAM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Daniel MEYER and Linda Meyer, individually and as parents of Shawn Meyer, a minor, Respondents, Judith Nietfeld and Brian Nietfeld, individually and as parents of Curtis Nietfeld, a minor, Respondents, Paynesville Independent School District No. 741, Respondent. No. A08-0864. Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

441 N.W.2d 766 (1989) Judith L. MEYER, Appellee, v. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL BOARD and Indian Hills Community College, Appellants. No. 87-1625. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 14, 1989. *767 Blair H. Dewey and William C. Whitten, Des Moines, for appellants. Gerald L. Hammond of Sayre & Gribble, P.C., Des Moines, for appellee.

188 F.Supp.2d 936 (2002) MEYER MATERIAL COMPANY, an Illinois general partnership, Plaintiff, v. Beniss MOOSHOL, Christine Mooshol, Christina's Closet, Ltd., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Christina's Fashion and BCD Group, Ltd., an Illinois corporation, Defendants. No. 00 C 7025. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 4, 2002.

680 N.E.2d 315 (1997) 176 Ill.2d 372 223 Ill.Dec. 582 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Glenn W. MEYER, Appellant. No. 80672. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 17, 1997. Rehearing Denied June 2, 1997. State Appellate Defender, Springfield, Fourth Judicial District, Judith L. Libby, Assis

661 N.E.2d 526 (1996) 277 Ill. App.3d 784 214 Ill.Dec. 672 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn W. MEYER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-95-0737. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. February 8, 1996. Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Defender, Judith L. Libby, Asst. Defender, Office of State Ap

OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. Rehak Creative Services, Inc. and Robert Rehak (collectively, “Rehak”) appeal from a final judgment granting a motion to dismiss in favor of appellees Ann L. Witt, Ellen Witt, Raymond Witt, and the Ann Witt Campaign (collectively, “Witt”). We affirm. Overview This appeal

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 171 OPINION As authorized by Code of Civil Procedure section 1294, subdivision (a), Dorothy Meyer appeals from the superior court's order denying her petition to compel Dr. Jacob Carnow to arbitrate her medical malpractice claim. We reverse and remand for furth

J-A17017-25 2025 PA Super 198 JOHN BOYLE AND CHERYL : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MCKINNEY : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : JUDITH MEYER AND OSPTA @HOME., : LLC D/B/A OSPTA HOME CARE & : No. 1212 WDA 2024 HO

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Kelly D. Williams died when her car was hit by Dylan A. Meyer’s vehicle. After-settling with Meyer’s insurance company, Appellants Judith and Robert Williams— Kelly’s parents and sole survivors — submitted a claim for underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. AMCO Insurance Company sued, seeking a declaration of no coverage under Kelly’s auto policy. Both pa

267 F.Supp.2d 184 (2003) KAREN L., by her mother JANE L., and Grisel Hernandez, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, and Patricia Wilson-Coker, in her official capacity, Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:99 CV 2244 C. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. June 9, 2003. *185 Shelley A. White, Sheldon V. Toubma

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-2723 ___________________________ AMCO Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Judith Williams; Robert Williams llllllllllllllll

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0314 Filed June 5, 2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDITH C. ROLENC REVOCABLE TRUST, SCOTT S. ROLENC, Beneficiary-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Montgomery County, Craig M. Dreismeier, Judge. Scott Rolenc appeals the district court’s order recognizing a successor

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION DRONEY, District Judge. The plaintiffs bring this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Physicians Health Services, Inc. (“PHS”) and Patricia Wilson-Coker, in her capacity as Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (“the Commissioner”), alleging violations of the federal Medicaid statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a

[Cite as CAK Ventures, L.L.C. v. 1690 Timber Lake, L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-1926.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CAK VENTURES, LLC, ET AL., JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Appellant’s-Cross Appellees Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.

292 F.Supp.2d 611 (2003) PHARMACIA CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, L.P., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-5292(MLC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 24, 2003. *612 *613 *614 John C. McGui

292 F.Supp.2d 594 (2003) PHARMACIA CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, L.P., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 02-5292(MLC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 24, 2003. *595 *596 John C. McGuire, Sedgewick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP,

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice, dissenting. Today, for the first time in the history of Texas jurisprudence, evidence is held le-*756gaily sufficient to support the imposition of an informal fiduciary duty on a limited partner to place the interests of the limited partnership before his own interests. The limited partner owed no formal fiduciary duty to th

Workman, Justice: This is an appeal by Kourt Security Partners, LLC, d/b/a Select Security (hereinafter “the Petitioner”) from a March 13, 2016, order granting summary judgment in favor of Judy’s Locksmiths, Inc., and Judith J. Ransom, d/b/a Judy’s Alarm Masters, (hereinafter “the Respondents”). The Petitioner contends the circuit court erred in granting

Cowin, J. The plaintiff, having been represented by the defendant attorney (among others) in connection with her divorce proceedings, sued the defendant on various theories for losses allegedly incurred by her as a result of that representation. A trial resulted in a jury verdict for the defendant on certain claims, directed verdicts for the defendant on other claims, and a finding by the judge in the defendant’s favor on the p