⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Judge v. Zook”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-06-30 · Published · cited 2× · 52 F. Supp. 3d 69; 2014 WL 2937487; 79 ERC (BNA) 1743; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88835
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Samuel Zook, Michelle McLain-Kruse, Birgitta Meade, and Annette Laitinen bring this action under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and its Administrator, Gina McCarthy, to compel
Zook v. Zookpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022-08-05 · Published · cited 7× · 978 N.W.2d 156; 312 Neb. 128
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/28/2022 09:05 AM CDT - 128 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 312 Nebraska Reports ZOOK V. ZOOK Cite as 312 Neb. 128 Michael R. Zook and Teresa L. Chramosta, Copersonal
Zook v. Martinpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018-10-18 · Published · cited 3× · 557 S.W.3d 880
Karen R. Baker, Associate Justice Randy Zook, petitioner, challenges the sufficiency of a statewide-initiative petition. Respondent, the Honorable Mark Martin, Arkansas Secretary of State, certified the initiative entitled "An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act," also known as "Issue No. 5," which is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. The proposed Act is sponsored by intervenor, Kristin Foster, Individually and on behalf of
Zook v. Martinpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2018-10-19 · Published · cited 5× · 558 S.W.3d 385
SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice Randy Zook, petitioner, challenges the sufficiency of the signatures certified by the respondent, the Honorable Mark Martin, Arkansas Secretary of State, in the statewide initiative ballot petition entitled "Arkansas Term Limits Amendment," which is on the November 6, 2018 ballot. The intervenor, Arkansas Term Limits, sponsored the petition. This court addresses the second issue raised in the orig
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-03-24 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Mar 24 2020, 8:57 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK estoppel, or the law of the case. Indiana Supreme Court Cou
State v. Zookpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020-10-07 · Published · cited 1× · 307 Or. App. 49; 476 P.3d 508
49 Argued and submitted February 11, affirmed October 7, 2020, petition for review denied March 18, 2021 (367 Or 709) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DANA CHRISTINE ZOOK, Defendant-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 17CR25725; A169897
in Re Ashley Zookpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2021-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00180-CV In re Ashley Zook ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Ashley Zook (Mother) petitions this Court for writ of mandamus seeking relief from the temporary order rendered on April 7, 2021, which granted the request of the attorney ad litem (AAL) t
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2021-06-04 · Published · cited 164× · 2021 COA 72
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-11-27 · Published · cited 5× · 909 F.3d 614
THACKER, Circuit Judge: A Virginia state court sentenced Mark Eric Lawlor to death after his conviction for the capital murder of Genevieve Orange. In recommending the death sentence, the sentencing jury found that there was a probability Lawlor "would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing serious threat to society."
Stickdorn v. Zookpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011-11-28 · Published · cited 18× · 957 N.E.2d 1014; 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1921; 2011 WL 5904426
957 N.E.2d 1014 (2011) Eric STICKDORN and Lisa Stickdorn, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Elam B. ZOOK, Sarah F. Zook, Samuel L. Lantz and Mattie Z. Lantz, Appellees-Defendants. No. 89A01-1012-CT-670. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 28, 2011. *1016 Kim E. Ferraro, Legal Environmental Aid Foundation, Valparaiso, IN, Attorney for A
Zook v. Pescepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014-05-16 · Published · cited 11× · 438 Md. 232; 91 A.3d 1114; 2014 Md. LEXIS 298
ADKINS, J. In this contest between two siblings, we consider the testamentary exception to the attorney-client privilege. Though both parties urge us to recognize this exception, they disagree on whether it was properly applied in this case. In the course *237 </
Juniper v. Zookpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015-08-03 · Published · cited 4× · 117 F. Supp. 3d 780; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101473; 2015 WL 4620102
OPINION JOHN A. GIBNEY, JR., District Judge. This matter comes back to the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to consider what, if any, procedurally defaulted claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel may be raised pursuant to Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). Petitioner Anthony Bernard Juniper, an inmate on dea
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-11-16 · Published · cited 28× · 876 F.3d 551
Vacated in part and remanded by published opinion. Judge Wynn wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Gregory and Judge Diaz concurred. WYNN, Circuit Judge: Following a bifurcated jury trial in the Circuit Court, City of Norfolk, Virginia, a jury convicted and sentenced to death Petitioner Anthony Juniper (“Petitioner”) f
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 Ohio 838
[Cite as Zook v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2017-Ohio-838.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jeffrey Zook et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : OhioHealth Foundation, Inc. et al., : No. 15AP-750 (C.P.C. No. 13CV-6033) [Involuntary] Plaintiffs- :
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-08-03 · Published · cited 41× · 898 F.3d 408
SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The majority grants Thomas Porter his request for discovery and an evidentiary hearing on his claims of juror bias. In my view, Porter's claim for dishonesty during voir dire was examined and rejected by the Supreme Court of Virginia, and that determination is not an unreasonable application of federal law. Moreove
Zook v. Johnspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 955 So. 2d 668; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7482; 2007 WL 1427457
PER CURIAM. We affirm the order determining homestead status, without prejudice to Zook’s continuing to pursue his claim against the estate. GUNTHER, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-10-20 · Published · cited 199× · 803 F.3d 694; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18202; 2015 WL 6147967
Dismissed and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge THACKER joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Thomas Alexander Porter appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Among the multiple claims Porter presented to the district court wa
Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2013-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 87 Va. Cir. 47; 2013 Va. Cir. LEXIS 153
By Judge Junius P. Fulton, III The Defendant’s Demurrers, Special Plea of Sovereign Immunity, and Motion for Summary Judgment were heard on May 28, 2013. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement pending consideration of the memoranda in support and opposition thereto and the applicable case law. The facts in this case are relatively straight forward. On May 25, 2012, Plain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 25× · 806 F.3d 803; 2015 WL 7720347
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-9 IVAN TELEGUZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, Respondent - Appellee. No. 14-2 IVAN TELEGUZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 61× · 806 F.3d 783; 2015 WL 7567402
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-5 RICKY JOVAN GRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, Respondent - Appellee. No. 14-3 RICKY JOVAN GRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Pri