Cases

784 F.Supp.2d 1059 (2011) BEST WOOD JUDGE FIREWOOD AND TREE SERVICE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, United States Department of Transportation Departmental Office of Civil Rights, Joseph Austin, Defendants. Case No. 09-C-0524. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 25, 2011. *1061 Brent D.

69 S.W.3d 60 (2001) TRANSPORTATION CABINET, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Appellant, v. Barry POE, Hon. Donald G. Smith, Administrative Law Judge and Workers' Compensation Board, Appellees. No. 2001-SC-0125-WC. Supreme Court of Kentucky. September 27, 2001. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 21, 2002. *61 W. Davi

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Pratt, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of William Pratt, Deceased, Respondent, v. Amisub of SC, Inc. d/b/a Piedmont Medical Center; Jaleesa Heyward, RN; South Carolina Emergency Physicians, LLC; Jonas Varaly, DO; Rock Hill Radiology Associates, LLC; and Geoffrey T. Gilleland, M.D.; Defendants, of which Rock Hill Radiology Associates, LLC, and Geoffrey T. Gilleland, M.D., are the Appellant

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Candace Eidson, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Coneitra Miller, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Joy Brown, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Crystal Rouse, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Amanda McDougald Scott, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Penny Hanna, on behalf of herself and her minor children; the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP; and The South Carolina

George W. Draper III, Judge The Missouri Department of Transportation (hereinafter, “Employer”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (hereinafter, “the Commission”) decision awarding Linda Mantia (hereinafter, “Employee”) workers’ compensation benefits representing 50 percent permanent partial disability of the body as a whole and the right to .future medical care for her .work-r

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Applied Building Sciences, Inc., Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Public Railways, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2021-000051 Appeal from Charleston County Bentley Price, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28184

PAUL C. WILSON, Judge. The Missouri Department of Transportation (“MoDOT”) fired Cheikh Seek for falsifying his doctor’s return-to-work certificate. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) determined that Seek was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits under section 288.050.21 because he had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. Seek appeals, an

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHN STANLEY HOFFMAN, Special Justice. We are called upon to decide whether or not the Court of Appeals abused its discretion by granting a writ of prohibition in a highway condemnation case prohibiting the Franklin Circuit Court Judge, Hon. Ray Corns, (“the respondent Judge”) from enforcing an order requiring the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Transportation Cabinet, Department of Highway

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and DeBordieu Colony Community Association, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2021-000158 Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Ralph King Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge Opinion No. 6058 Heard March 7, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE CUNNINGHAM Appellant, Sycilla Collins, individually and as administratrix of her husband, Leonard Collins, Jr.’s, estate, appeals the Court of Appeals’ decision to reverse an order of the Letcher Circuit Court reversing and remanding the Board of Claims’ (the “Board”) order of dismissal. The facts underlying this appeal concern a motor vehicle accident that oc

Justice BEATTY. After prevailing in a condemnation action, landowners (“Petitioners”) moved for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to section 28 — 2—510(B)(1) of the Eminent Domain Procedure Act (the “Act”). 1 Contrary to Petitioners’ view, the circuit court determined attorneys’ fees should be awarded based on an hourly

STEPHEN T. COCHRAN v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (SC 20940) D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff appealed, on the granting of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which had reversed the decision of the Compensation Review Board. The board had upheld an award of statutory (§ 31-307 (a)) total incapacity benefits to the plaintiff in connection with

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 23, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Appellant-Respondent, v. South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff, Hasala Dharmawardena, CMC Recycling, Cypress Creek Renewables, LLC, South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs, Sierra Club, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, South Carolina Energy Users Committee, South Carolina Solar Business Alliance, Inc., South Carolina State Conference of the National Association for the Advancem

384 S.C. 295 (2009) 682 S.E.2d 282 Evan and Leslie JONES, Appellants v. SC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL and Arthur Moore, Respondents. No. 4583. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted June 1, 2009. Decided July 7, 2009. Rehearing Denied August 25, 2009. *

485 F.Supp.2d 661 (2007) SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION; South Carolina Coastal Conservation League; and Audubon South Carolina, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Tony L. Chapman, Acting Executive Director, South Carolina Department of Transportation; Federal Highway Administration; and Robert L. Lee, Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Defendants. No. 2:06 CV 02528 DCN.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3266 ___________________________ Ria Schumacher Plaintiff - Appellee v. SC Data Center, Inc., doing business as Colony Brands, Inc.

379 S.C. 160 (2008) 666 S.E.2d 236 Edward D. SLOAN, Jr., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of South Carolina and the Commission of the Department of Transportation, Tee Hooper, Jr., Robert W. Harrell, John N. Hardee, Marion P. Carnell, William C. Turner, Bobby T. Jones, and J.M. Truluck, in their official capacities as Commiss

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Public Interest Foundation, Edward D. Sloan, Jr., and William B. Depass, Jr., individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Appellants, v. Richland County, Respondent, And Central Midlands Regional Transit Authority, Intervenor/Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2018-000794 Appeal From Richland County G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1448 Doc: 39 Filed: 05/12/2026 Pg: 1 of 15 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1448 AMERICAN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION OF SC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff – Appellant, v.