Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Juana Bermudez”
Antonio Bermudez, Jr. v. Juana Zapatapublic domain
March 26, 2015 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ANTONIO BERMUDEZ, JR., Appellant NO. 14-15-00097-CV V. JUANA ZAPATA, Appellee ________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on November
Antonio Bermudez, Jr. v. Juana Zapatapublic domain
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00097-CV ANTONIO BERMUDEZ, JR., Appellant V. JUANA ZAPATA, Appellee On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20
Antonio Bermudez, Jr. v. Juana Zapatapublic domain
Order filed, February 18, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-15-00097-CV ____________ ANTONIO BERMUDEZ, JR., Appellant V. JUANA ZAPATA, Appellee On Appeal from the 246th District Court
Juana Ramos Rafael v. Merrick B. Garlandpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0233p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JUANA DOMINGA RAMOS RAFAEL, │
Juana Hernandez-Garcia v. William P. Barrpublic domain
Wood, Chief Judge. Juana Hernandez-Garcia is a citizen of Guatemala. She and two of her children, Brian and Yeniser Morales-Hernandez, entered the United States without proper documentation on August 29, 2015. They immediately received Notices to Appear for removal proceedings, but those Notices did not specify a date and time for their hearing. Later, when they nonetheless appeared bef
Juana Hernandez-Garcia v. William P. Barrpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-3297 JUANA HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, et al., Petitioners, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of an Order
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI IRMA CASTRO RIVERA APELACIÓN TAMBIÉN CONOCIDA COMO procedente del IRMA SIACA, Y CARLOS Tribunal de RAFAEL CASTRO RIVERA Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Apelados KLAN202401091 S
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII ROBERT JAMES APELACIÓN HATTON GOTAY, su procedente del esposa MARÍA DE LOS Tribunal de Primera ÁNGELES RENTAS Instancia, Sala COSTAS Y LA Superior de Ponce SOCICIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES
ROSALES VARGAS and ROSALES ROSALESpublic domain
Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 745 (BIA 2020) Interim Decision #3973 Matter of Juana ROSALES VARGAS, Respondent Jonathan Jair ROSALES ROSALES, Respondent Decided January 9, 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A notice to appear that does not include the address of t
State v. Rhodespublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Martinez v. Nash Finch Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s (“Avanza”) Motion to Dismiss (# 14), the Plaintiffs’ response (# 17), and Avanza’s reply (# 20). FACTS Although lengthy, the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (# 3) describes a straightforward factual sc
Perez v. Mountaire Farms, Inc.public domain
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
Febus-Rodriguez v. QUESTELL-ALVARADOpublic domain
660 F.Supp.2d 157 (2009) Angel FEBUS-RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enrique QUESTELL-ALVARADO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1627(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 18, 2009. Opinion Denying Reconsideration October 2, 2009. *161 Frank D. Inserni-Milam, Frank D. Inserni Law Office,
Figueroa Rivera v. El Telar, Inc.public domain
Opinión disidente emitida por la Jueza Asociada Señora Fiol Matta, a la cual se une la Juez Asociada Señora Rodríguez Rodríguez. Cuando el desempleo condena a mi ser humano y a su familia al hambre o a la indignidad, hay que llegar a límites de exigencia para privarle de la protección que ha ganado acceso a nuestra legislación social. ... Crista-lina debe ser la justificaci
People v. Rodríguez Esmurriapublic domain
per curiam : The district attorney filed an information against Santos Rodriguez Esmurria for the offense of burglary in the first degree, consisting in that the said defendant “sometime in the evening of May 10-11, 1963, and in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico . . . illegally, wilfully and maliciously entered at nighttime the office of Higinio Bermudez Meléndez with the criminal intent of committing larceny or petty theft.”
People v. Ortiz Colónpublic domain
Mr. Justice Blanco Lugo delivered the opinion of the Court.. It is provided by § 117 of the Penal Code (1937 ed.), 33 L.P.R.A. § 421 that “Every person who, having taken an oath that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any of the cases in which such an oath may by law be administered, wilfully and contrary to such oath, states as true any ma
Flores Ortiz v. Rodríguezpublic domain
Opinion of Mr. Justice Belaval with whom Mr. Chief Justice Snyder and Mr. Justice Negrón Fernández concur. This is an action of revendication, where the plaintiffs and appellees alleged in the former District Court of Ponce that their ancestors, Nicolás Flores Cintrón and Ceferina Ortiz Flores, were husband and wife and the owners of a 21-cuerda property located at Barrio Viílalba
González v. Díazpublic domain
Mr. Justice Audrey delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint on the motion of the defendants after the court had sustained their demurrer on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Martin, Isabel, Juana Basilisa and Maria del Carmen Gonzalez Bermudez, four of the six children and heirs of
González-Bermúdez v. Díazpublic domain
Mr. Justice Aldrey delivered the opinion of the court. José Antonio González Rivera mortgaged in 1893 a property of 170 acres to Tomás Aquino González Hernández to secure a debt, and upon his death in the same year a partition of his estate was made by his widow and by a guardian appointed by the court of first instance to represent his minor children. By this partition, which was approved by the court and re
Flores Ortiz v. Rodríguezpublic domain
Juez Asociado Sr. Belaval en la cual concurren los Jueces Presidente Sr. Snyder y Asociado Sr. Ne-gron Fernández. Opinión del Se trata de una acción de reivindicación, donde los deman-dantes y apelantes alegaron ante la anterior Corte de Dis-trito de Ponce, que sus causantes don Nicolás Flores Cintrón y doña Ceferina Ortiz Flores, eran casados entre sí y dueños de una finca de vei