Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Juan Diego Cervantes”
Cervantes v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Angulo Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the BIA’s determinations that a conviction is a controlled substance offense rendering an al
Cervantes v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Angulo Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the BIA’s determinations that a conviction is a controlled substance offense rendering an al
United States v. Cervantes-Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Cervantes-Gonzales appeals his conviction and 100-month sentence for vio*279lation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.2 Cervantes-Gonzales is a twenty-nine-year-old native of Mexico who became a legal permanent resident
Ceja-Cervantes v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Juan Ceja-Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Ceja’s application was initially rejected by an Immigration Judge on the ground that he had not established that his removal would constitute an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1229
State of Tennessee v. Juan Diego Vargaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 15, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUAN DIEGO VARGAS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-B-1410 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-02458-CCA-R3-CD – Filed February 21, 2017
United States v. Juan Cabrerapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-50259 21-50261 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 3:20-cr-00435- LAB JUAN CARLOS CABRERA,
Juan Vargas v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
02/26/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 12, 2020 JUAN VARGAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-B-1410 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________
United States v. Juan MacIaspublic domain
Opinion by Judge BENAVIDES; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WARDLAW. OPINION BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This is a direct criminal appeal from convictions for being a removed alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and for making a false claim of United States citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. Finding no reversible error, we affirm
United States v. Conchaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Luis Juan Conchas (“Conchas”) appeals his jury trial conviction for importing marijuana into the United States (21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960) and possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). We affirm. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. United States v. Diaz-Cardenas, 351 F.3d 404 (9th Cir. 2003), addressing nearly iden
United States v. Joy A-Guerreropublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Joya-Guerrero appeals from his judgment and sentence for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Joya-Guerrero first argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the voluntariness of statements he made to a government agent. We review the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on a motion to suppress for
United States v. Fernandezpublic domain
172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi
United States v. Perdomo-Espanapublic domain
522 F.3d 983 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Donaldo PERDOMO-ESPANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-50232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 2008.[*] Filed April 14, 2008. *984 Elizabeth A. Missakian, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant.<
United States v. Estefani Zaragoza-Moreirapublic domain
OPINION GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge: Defendant Estefani Zaragoza-Moreira (“Zaragoza”) conditionally pled guilty to importing methamphetamine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. She now appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the. indictment on the basis that the government destroyed potentially usefu
People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.public domain
CHIN, J. *396 *303 Real party in interest, Pablo Ullisses Lara, Jr. (hereafter, defendant), was charged in criminal (or adult) court with sex crimes allegedly committed in 2014 and 2015 when he
United States v. Fernandezpublic domain
TROTT, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether the district court properly sanctioned the United States for violating a discovery order by precluding the government from seeking the death penalty against Fernando Alvidrez, Marcel Arevalo, Daniel Bravo, Javier Alvidrez Duarte, Gerardo Jacobo, and Robert Mercado (collectively “Defendants”). The district court’s decision to impose this sanction was based on the gover
United States v. Gumercindo Salazar-Gonzalezpublic domain
458 F.3d 851 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gumercindo SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-50411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 2005. Opinion Filed April 21, 2006. Amended Opinion Filed August 15, 2006.
United States v. Gumereindo Salazar-Gonzalezpublic domain
445 F.3d 1208 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gumereindo SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-50411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 2005. Filed April 21, 2006. Vincent J. Brunkow, Steven F. Hubachek, Federal Defenders of S
Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.public domain
*965ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE This is an employment discrimination dispute between Plaintiff Juan Carlos Robles (“Robles”) and his former employer, Defendant Agreserves, Inc. (“Agre-serves”), his former ■ foreman Defendant George Campo (“Campo”),1 and his f
United States v. Perdomo-Espanapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50232 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-06-00711- JUAN DONALDO PERDOMO-ESPANA, MLH-1 Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court fo
138 F.3d 393 40 Fed.R.Serv.3d 104, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1490,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2071 Margot HERNANDEZ, and as Guardian ad Litem for minors JoanaHauri & Lizeth Simones; Elizabeth Carmona; Celia Gallardo;Anaberta Pule; Juan Damaso; Edith Navarette, and asGuardian ad Litem for Armando Gallardo; Gelacio Herrera;Armando Nmi Avila; Salvador Ayala; Alciviadez Ayala;Silvia Garduno; An