⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Juan Diego Cervantes”

Cervantes v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F. App'x 835
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Angulo Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the BIA’s determinations that a conviction is a controlled substance offense rendering an al
Cervantes v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F. App'x 835
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Angulo Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the BIA’s determinations that a conviction is a controlled substance offense rendering an al
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 238 F. App'x 278
MEMORANDUM ** Juan Cervantes-Gonzales appeals his conviction and 100-month sentence for vio*279lation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.2 Cervantes-Gonzales is a twenty-nine-year-old native of Mexico who became a legal permanent resident
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 130 F. App'x 112
MEMORANDUM *** Juan Ceja-Cervantes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Ceja’s application was initially rejected by an Immigration Judge on the ground that he had not established that his removal would constitute an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,” as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1229
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 15, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUAN DIEGO VARGAS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-B-1410 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-02458-CCA-R3-CD – Filed February 21, 2017
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-50259 21-50261 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. v. 3:20-cr-00435- LAB JUAN CARLOS CABRERA,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
02/26/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 12, 2020 JUAN VARGAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2010-B-1410 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-06-15 · Published · cited 31× · 789 F.3d 1011; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10026; 2015 WL 3650697
Opinion by Judge BENAVIDES; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge WARDLAW. OPINION BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This is a direct criminal appeal from convictions for being a removed alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and for making a false claim of United States citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. Finding no reversible error, we affirm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 302 F. App'x 711
MEMORANDUM *** Luis Juan Conchas (“Conchas”) appeals his jury trial conviction for importing marijuana into the United States (21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960) and possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)). We affirm. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. United States v. Diaz-Cardenas, 351 F.3d 404 (9th Cir. 2003), addressing nearly iden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 203 F. App'x 87
MEMORANDUM * Joya-Guerrero appeals from his judgment and sentence for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Joya-Guerrero first argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the voluntariness of statements he made to a government agent. We review the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on a motion to suppress for
District Court, C.D. California · 2001-07-18 · Published · cited 1× · 172 F. Supp. 2d 1252; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19927; 2001 WL 1359967
172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-04-14 · Published · cited 26× · 522 F.3d 983; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8355; 2008 WL 1700519
522 F.3d 983 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Donaldo PERDOMO-ESPANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-50232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 5, 2008.[*] Filed April 14, 2008. *984 Elizabeth A. Missakian, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant.<
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 21× · 780 F.3d 971; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4320; 2015 WL 1219535
OPINION GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge: Defendant Estefani Zaragoza-Moreira (“Zaragoza”) conditionally pled guilty to importing methamphetamine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. She now appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the. indictment on the basis that the government destroyed potentially usefu
California Supreme Court · 2018-02-01 · Published · cited 621× · 228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 394; 410 P.3d 22; 4 Cal. 5th 299
CHIN, J. *396 *303 Real party in interest, Pablo Ullisses Lara, Jr. (hereafter, defendant), was charged in criminal (or adult) court with sex crimes allegedly committed in 2014 and 2015 when he
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-11-07 · Published · cited 57× · 231 F.3d 1240; 2000 WL 1664424
TROTT, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether the district court properly sanctioned the United States for violating a discovery order by precluding the government from seeking the death penalty against Fernando Alvidrez, Marcel Arevalo, Daniel Bravo, Javier Alvidrez Duarte, Gerardo Jacobo, and Robert Mercado (collectively “Defendants”). The district court’s decision to impose this sanction was based on the gover
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-08-15 · Published · cited 19× · 458 F.3d 851; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20835; 2006 WL 2347705
458 F.3d 851 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gumercindo SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-50411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 2005. Opinion Filed April 21, 2006. Amended Opinion Filed August 15, 2006.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-04-21 · Published · cited 4× · 445 F.3d 1208; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10036; 2006 WL 1044216
445 F.3d 1208 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Gumereindo SALAZAR-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-50411. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 2005. Filed April 21, 2006. Vincent J. Brunkow, Steven F. Hubachek, Federal Defenders of S
District Court, E.D. California · 2016-01-27 · Published · cited 30× · 158 F. Supp. 3d 952; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9711; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,482; 2016 WL 323775
*965ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE This is an employment discrimination dispute between Plaintiff Juan Carlos Robles (“Robles”) and his former employer, Defendant Agreserves, Inc. (“Agre-serves”), his former ■ foreman Defendant George Campo (“Campo”),1 and his f
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-50232 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-06-00711- JUAN DONALDO PERDOMO-ESPANA, MLH-1 Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court fo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-03-03 · Published · cited 63× · 138 F.3d 393; 98 Daily Journal DAR 2071; 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 104; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3277
138 F.3d 393 40 Fed.R.Serv.3d 104, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1490,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2071 Margot HERNANDEZ, and as Guardian ad Litem for minors JoanaHauri & Lizeth Simones; Elizabeth Carmona; Celia Gallardo;Anaberta Pule; Juan Damaso; Edith Navarette, and asGuardian ad Litem for Armando Gallardo; Gelacio Herrera;Armando Nmi Avila; Salvador Ayala; Alciviadez Ayala;Silvia Garduno; An