Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-525 No. COA21-83 Filed 2 August 2022 Edgecombe County, Nos. 18 CRS 52623; 18 CRS 52631 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. RANDALL LEE JOYNER Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 5 February 2020 by Judge Leonard L. Wiggins in Edgecombe County Superior Cour

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-525 No. COA21-83 Filed 2 August 2022 Edgecombe County, Nos. 18 CRS 52623; 18 CRS 52631 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. RANDALL LEE JOYNER Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 5 February 2020 by Judge Leonard L. Wiggins in Edgecombe County Superior Cour

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON On-Brief May 16, 2006 JERRY JOYNER v. PERSONAL FINANCE CORPORATION A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Henry County No. 19911 The Honorable Ron E. Harmon, Chancellor No. W2005-02202-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 5, 2006 This is a summary judgment case. Appellant

314 Ga. 1 FINAL COPY S21G0764. JOYNER et al. V. LEAPHART et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. In Joyner v. Leaphart, 358 Ga. App. 383 (853 SE2d 407) (2021), the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice Vanessa and Brock Joyner’s wrongful death action against defendants Dr. Lynn Leaphart and MPPG, Inc. (“MPPG”), in accordance with the “two-dismissal rule” of OCGA § 9-11-41 (a) (3)1 following the Joyners’ voluntary dismissal of two later-fi

If a municipality collects taxes from the businesses within its police jurisdiction, that municipality must provide within the police jurisdiction services that cost the municipality the amount of the tax collected there. Holt Civic Club v. City ofTuscaloosa, 439 U.S. 60, 99 S.Ct. 383, 58 L.Ed.2d 292 (1978). I referred to this as a duty in the majority opinion in

OPINION LILLARD, Judge. This is a civil rights case. Appellants, Shelby County and Shelby County Sheriff A.C. Gilless, Jr., appeal a jury verdict finding them liable for violating the civil rights of Appellee Charles Thomas Joyner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because the alleged civil rights violation was caused by simple negligence, and' not by a County poli

CRAWFORD, Judge. Carol Helvenston was committed to the Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI) by order of the Circuit Court of Davidson County filed November 11, 1981, pursuant to the procedure for judicial hospitalization in Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-604 (Cum.Sup.1982). Through court-appointed counsel, Helvenston has appealed the commitment order, asserting violations of her federal constitutional rights. Three issues h

USCA11 Case: 22-13728 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 03/25/2026 Page: 1 of 63 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13728 ____________________ TERRY JOYNER,

The petitioners, certain members of the Florida Senate acting in their capacity as senators, filed an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus, which seeks to compel the Florida House of Representatives to reconvene and continue the 2015 regular legislative session until the conclusion of the session at midnight on May 1, 2015. The petitioners contend that the action of the House in unilaterally adjourning sine die at 1:15 p.m. on April 28, 2015, was con

158 P.3d 263 (2007) The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Ramon Anthony JOYNER, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2006-0032. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. May 31, 2007. *265 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General By Randall M. Howe and Eric J. Olsson, Tucson, Attorneys for Appellee. Isabel G. Garcia, Pima Count

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : v. : Criminal Action No.: 23-309 (RC) : SHAMELL NAQUAN JOYNER, : Re Document Nos.: 49, 52, 53, 54, 98,

Gelinas, J. Frederic Joyner was convicted of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon (G. L. c. 265, § 15A) by a jury of six in the Dorchester District Court. The victim, Derek Moore, did not testify, nor did his girlfriend, Joyce O’Neil. Neither appeared at trial, despite efforts of the Commonwealth to locate them and to require their attendance by a subpoena. On his appeal, the defendant argues that the trial judge e

441 Pa. 242 (1971) Commonwealth v. Joyner, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 14, 1970. January 7, 1971. *243 Before BELL, C.J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ. Sanford Kahn, for appellant. James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, with him Jeffrey A.

BEALES, J., with whom ALSTON, J., joins, concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part. The facts presented in this appeal are tragic and disturbing, as the majority opinion aptly describes. However, disturbing as they are, we, nevertheless, as judges on this Court, are *499r

LARRY G. ELDER, Judge. A jury found Anthony Dale Crawford (appellant) guilty of abduction with the intent to defile, rape, and capital murder of Sarah Crawford, his estranged wife, and also convicted him of use of a firearm in the commission of a murder, use of a firearm in the commission of an abduction, and grand larceny. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred wh

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS MAY 31 2007 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ) ) 2 CA-CR 2006-0032 Appellee, ) DEPARTM

214 F.3d 523 (4th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.RICHARD JOYNER HOLLAND, JR.; SHIRLEY JEAN HOLLAND WRIGHT; GREGORY F. HOLLAND, Co-executors of the Estate of Richard Joyner Holland, Sr., Deceased, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-6823. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Argued: January 27, 2000.Decided: June 15, 2000.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 993 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 994 William Joyner and Debra Joyner sued B P Pest Control, Inc. ("B P"), alleging that in 1998 the Joyners had a termite infe

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — driving while intoxicated.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Fine and Davis, JJ.

BENTON, Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that the amendments to the two indictments surprised Crawford and that the trial judge was *670plainly wrong in finding no surprise. However, I do not agree with the majority that the trial judge’s error in refusing to grant a continuance constituted harmless error. Code § 19.2-231 st