⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Joyce Elizabeth Libby”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CAROLYN DAVIS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 07-cv-1302 (RCL)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001-05-07 · Published · cited 30× · 777 A.2d 114
777 A.2d 114 (2001) ESTATE OF Amos A. ANGLE, Deceased. Appeal of: Faye Heinbaugh, Paul E. Angle, Joseph Angle, Appellants. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted February 20, 2001. Filed May 7, 2001. *116 Kendra D. McGuire, Lancaster, for appellants. James Angle, appellee, pro se. Ronald E. Angle, appellee, pro se.</
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CAROLYN DAVIS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 07-cv-1302 (RCL)
Irish v. Gimbelpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000-01-06 · Published · cited 21× · 2000 ME 2; 743 A.2d 736; 2000 Me. LEXIS 2
743 A.2d 736 (2000) 2000 ME 2 Russell IRISH et al. v. Gregory GIMBEL. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued October 5, 1999. Decided January 6, 2000. Gerald F. Pettruccelli (orally), Linda C. Russell, Petruccelli & Martin, LLP, Portland, Paul R. Dumas Jr., Joyce, Dumas, David and Hanstein, P.A., Mexico, C. Donald Briggs III, Cloutier &a;
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-03-30 · Published · cited 77× · 882 F. Supp. 2d 7; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44296; 2012 WL 1059700
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This action arises out of the devastating 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The attack decimated the facility, killed 241 U.S. servicemen and left countless others wounded. Various affected servicemen and family members now bring suit against defendants Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) and the Irania
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
14‐2027 In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
Illinois Supreme Court · 1930-12-18 · Published · cited 2× · 174 N.E. 406; 342 Ill. 296
On October 5, 1928, Maximilian J. St. George, appellee, filed his bill in the circuit court of Cook county praying for partition of certain premises and the setting aside of outstanding tax deeds as clouds upon the title thereof. After a hearing by the chancellor a decree was entered in accordance with the prayer of the bill. This appeal by the *Page 297 Elmhurst State Bank, Lucy M. Glos, and others, who were made defendants, followed. The bill all
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 86× · 830 F.3d 66; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13225; 2016 WL 3913403
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: On this appeal, we consider challenges to an award of summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, /.), which forfeited to the United States various claimants’ interests in multiple properties, including a 36-story office building located at 650 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan (“the Building”), real properties in Maryland, Texas, California, Virgini
State v. Watsonpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876-02-26 · Published · cited 1× · 65 Me. 74; 1876 Me. LEXIS 13
Barrows, J. Watson was convicted upon certain counts in an indictment charging him with wilfully and maliciously setting fire to a barn at Cape Elizabeth, belonging to Simon Jordan, with intent to burn said Jordan’s dwelling house which was thereby burnt and consumed; and with arson of the same dwelling house by wilfully and maliciously setting fire thereto. The scene of the alleged crime was a farm house in the
Jaques v. Chandlerpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905-11-07 · Published · cited 31× · 62 A. 713; 73 N.H. 376; 1905 N.H. LEXIS 60
The husband may waive the provisions of his wife's will in his favor by writing filed within one year after her decease, "and not afterwards, unless the judge of probate, upon petition and for good cause shown, shall extend the time." P. S., c. 186, s. 13; Ib., c. 195, s. 14. The plaintiff's petition for leave to file a waiver of the will after the expiration of the year having been denied by the probate court, he duly appealed to and prosecuted his appeal in the superior court. That court, u
State v. Moorepublic domain
Utah Supreme Court · 1909-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 36 Utah 521; 105 P. 293; 1909 Utah LEXIS 91
FRICK, J. Appellant was convicted of the crime of adultery. After the overruling of motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, the court entered'judgment imposing the statutory penalty for the offense, and the appellant appeals. The first error assigned relates to the sufficiency of the information. After charging that the appellant was a married woman and the wife of one C. H. Moore, and that she, on a
Krzyszke v. Kaminpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 1910-11-11 · Published · cited 3× · 163 Mich. 290; 128 N.W. 190; 1910 Mich. LEXIS 601
Stone, J. This is an action on the case for damages for an alleged malicious prosecution by the issuance of an unauthorized injunction against the plaintiff. The declaration was inartificially drawn, but, not having been demurred to, is, we think, sufficient to support a recovery. It avers that, to wit, on March 1, 1908, the plaintiff was a resident of the township of Huron, in the county of Wayne, and was there the owner and in
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 46× · 830 F.3d 107; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13226
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS