Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgment reversed without costs and matter remanded to the *109court below for a new trial limited to the issue of damages in accordance with the decision herein. To establish a cause of action for false imprisonment, “the plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant intended to confine him, (2) the plaintif

OPINION MIKE WILLSON,. JUSTICE Joyce Janette’ Riddle 1 appeals the order of the trial court in which the trial court granted the City of Abilene’s plea--to the jurisdiction on her premises defect claim against the City. Riddle argues, in her sole issue, that the trial court erred when it granted th

ORTEGA, P. J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for three counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, and six counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. Defendant’s 10 assignments of error concern the admissibility of hearsay evidence under OEC 803(18a)(b). The challenged hearsay evidence consists of testimony and evidence from interviews of the five-year-old victim recounting that defendan

*689OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE NOBLE In this case, the trial court allowed the Intervening Parties to intervene in a divorce action, even though they had no interest in the marriage or the' marital estate. The court did so because the Intervening Parties sought to intervene for the purportedly limited purpose of unsealing records in the court file. The Court of Appeals decli

*488 BREWER, J. Police officers unlawfully detained defendant when he was a passenger in a car. During that unlawful detention, the officers ascertained defendant’s identity and ran a warrant check, which revealed that defendant was the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. The officers arrested defen

WALLACE, Judge. Eric Jensen and Joyce Jensen appeal a final judgment awarding damages against them and in favor of Cynthia Bailey on her claim for the Jensens’ failure to disclose material defects in their residence to Mrs. Bailey under Johnson v. Davis, 480 So.2d 625 (Fla.1985). Because the circuit court found that the Jensens had no knowledge of the defects but improperly found the Jensens liable to Mrs. Bailey

EGAN, J., dissenting. I agree with the majority’s reasoning with respect to its suppression analysis under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Because I do not agree, however, that the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Dempster, 248 Or 404, 434 P2d 746 (1967) controls with respect to the analysis of the federal exclusionary rule, I respectfully dissent. Although I

31 So.3d 809 (2009) Meigo BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D08-3267. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 22, 2009. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. *810 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Mich

PER CURIAM: Murry Bailey appeals his convictions for sexual exploitation of a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), and possession of *1200 child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). On appeal, Bailey argues that the indictment was insufficiently clear and that there was

OPINION BY TAMILIA, J.: ¶ 1 On February 13, 1996, after pleading guilty on January 4, 1996 to two counts of corrupt organizations (RICO),1 five counts of criminal conspiracy2 to deliver a controlled substance and 26 counts of delivery of a controlled substance,3 the appellant, Delroy A. Bailey, was sentenced to ten (10) to tw

SCHWELB, Associate Judge, concurring: I agree with the sanction that the court imposes and with much of my colleagues’ analysis, including the conclusion that Mr. Bailey engaged in negligent misappropriation. I do not join the opinion, however, because in my view, much that the court has written is dictum addressing two questions the resolution of which, in the final analysis, can have no effect on the outc

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00039-CV L. F. Clark; Annie Rosalis; Alice Tabor; and Joyce Bailey, Appellants v.

HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. 17PIainfiffs-Appeflants, Geneee Baker and Joyce J. Johnson,1 appeal the trial court’s judgments which denied their voluntary motions to. dismiss with prejudice, and instead granted motions for. summary judgment and dismissed their claims with prejudice against defendants-appellees, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, Humble Incorporated, Cono-coPhillips C

HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. | ^Appellees, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Humble Incorporated, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, Karen Alexie Rodrigue, Hermina McCall and Edna Raymond. For the following reasons, we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal and remand this matter back to the trial court to enter a written judgment on appellants’ motions to dismiss with prej

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael D. Bailey, appeals his conviction and sentence in the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, following the entry of a guilty plea for Operation While Under the Influence of Alcohol. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the court below. {¶ 2} On May 18, 2005, Bailey was indicted on one count of Driving While Under the I

HANS J. LILJEBERG,-Judge. 17PIaintiffs-Appellants, Betty Arcement, Virginia DiMarco, Mary Bradley Doris, Porter Edwards, Jr., Joan Haas Folse, Wynesta Gaston, Shirley Jackson, Hayes J. Lepine, Carla Simmons, Kieron Walker and Carol Walters, appeal the trial court’s judgments which- denied their voluntary motions to dismiss their wrongful death causes of action with prejudice, and instead granted a motion for summary judgment a

HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. 17Plamtiff-Appellant, Harold Bowie, appeals the trial court’s decision to grant the motion for summary' judgment filed by defendants-appelle'és1 which dismissed all of his claims with ’prejudice, rather than grant plaintiffs voluntary motion to ■ dismiss his wrongful death cause of action with prejudice..- Plaintiff does not contest the merits of the trial court’s decisi

[Cite as State v. Joyce, 2022-Ohio-3370.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-L-006 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas MICHAEL S. JOYCE,

05-24-00209-CV St acey Kemp , County Cl erk 2100 B loomdale Road, C O L L I N C O U N T Y Suite 1236 0

05-24-00209-CV Electronically Filed 2/23/2024 3:21 PM Stacey Kemp County Clerk Collin County, Texas By: Lisa Chambers, Deputy Envelope: 84855019 CAUSE