Cases

551 F.Supp.2d 549 (2008) Rusty BRIDGES, Individually and on Behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries and on Behalf of the Estate of Mary Claudine Bridges, Plaintiff v. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Enterprise Transportation Company, Raymond Toulmon, and John Does 1-5, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:05-cv-786-WHB-LRA. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.

103 P.3d 135 (2004) 2004 UT 91 Heidi J. JUDD, personally and as the natural parent and guardian of Athan Montgomery, for and on behalf of Athan Montgomery, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gregory DREZGA, M.D. and Tooele Valley Regional Medical Center, Defendants and Appellee. No. 20010646. Supreme Court of Utah. November 5, 2004.

255 So.2d 63 (1971) 260 La. 29 Mrs. Myrtle TRAHAN et al. v. GULF CREWS, INC., et al. Nos. 51410, 51443. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 8, 1971. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1971. *65 Jones & Jones, J. B. Jones, Jr., Cameron, for plaintiffs-applicants. Edgar F. Barnett, La

Dissenting opinion from order denying rehearing in banc filed by Circuit Judge NIES in which Chief Judge ARCHER and Circuit Judge PLAGER joined. NIES, Circuit Judge. It is rare for patent litigation to present an appellate court with only constitutional issues. This case is that rarity. By a petition for mandamus, a patentee sought an order for a jury trial on a declaratory judgment counterclai

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

ROGERS, C. J. The issues in this case, which comes to us on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199b(d), 1 are: (1) Does Connecticut public policy support imposing a duty on a school to warn about or protect against the risk of a serious insect-borne diseas

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

581 So.2d 772 (1990) Cynthia A. POWELL and Bruce Powell v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA. 88-1342. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 28, 1990. *773 John W. Haley of Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, Birmingham, for appellants. Duncan B. Blair of Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, and Walter F. Scott III, Bi

339 Mass. 82 (1959) 157 N.E.2d 662 BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT and TRUST COMPANY, trustee, vs. ALFRED UNIVERSITY & others. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Worcester. March 2, 1959. April 21, 1959. Present: WILKINS, C.J., SPALDING, WILLIAMS, COUNIHAN, & CUTTER, JJ. James A. Crotty, Jr., stated the case. Remsen

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. On February 24, 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) sought approval from voters to increase the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the school district. The referendum passed with 6,395 residents voting in favor and 5,515 against.

895 F.Supp. 530 (1995) Ellen BRAUNE, Juli Ann Harnett, Elizabeth Rougny, and Kathryn Sullivan Lincoln, Plaintiffs, v. The ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc., Carnrick Laboratories, Inc., Chase Chemical Co., Chromally American Corporation, Dart Industries, Inc., p/k/a Rexall Drug Co., Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., Kremers-Urban Co., n/k/a Mequon Co., Lincoln Laboratories, Inc., Mallincrodt Inc., M

SANBORN, Circuit Judge (dissenting). Lord Chancellor Cotten-ham, presiding in the High Court of Chancery in England in 1841 said in Wollworth v. Holt, 4 Mylne & Craig, 619, 635: “I think it the duty of this court to adapt its practice and course of proceeding to the existing state of society, and not by too strict an adherence to forms and rules established under different circumstances to decline

52 F.3d 967 63 USLW 2663, 34 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Herbert MARKMAN and Positek, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC. and Althon Enterprises, Inc.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-1049. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 5, 1995. William B. Mallin, Ecke