Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joshua P Thompson”
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
ARROWOOD, Judge. *577 Kolton James Thompson ("defendant") appeals from judgments entered on his convictions for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury and possession of a firearm by a felon. For the reasons stated herein, we find no error in part, and dism
THOMPSON v. STATEpublic domain
LEWIS, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶1 Roy Dale Thompson, Appellant, was tried by jury and convicted of Count 1, second degree burglary, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1435 ; Count 2, assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652 ; Count 3, possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 1283(A) ; and Count 4, possession of a
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
ZACHARY, Judge. *370 Jerry Thompson (defendant) appeals from the judgment sentencing him for convictions of felony possession of marijuana, possession with intent to sell or deliver marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. On appeal, defe
Thompson v. Toyosity, LLCpublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a)' SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and COHEN, J.J., concur.
Raymond Thompson v. Joshua Cockrellpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2120 ___________________________ Raymond Thompson Plaintiff - Appellant v. Joshua Cockrell; Robert Gerholdt De
JOHNSON, JOSHUA v. THOMPSON, JOSHUA W.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 412 CA 16-01422 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. JOSHUA JOHNSON AND ANGELA JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSHUA W. THOMPSON AND RONALD A. CORNELL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. GREENE & REID, PLLC, SYRACUSE (EUGENE W. LANE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK &
UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. Thompsonpublic domain
HOTTEN, J. This case arises from a significant jury award for compensatory and punitive damages by a jury, sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, in favor of appellees, sisters Nancy Lee Katherine Thompson (“Kathy”) and Barbara Clements *506
Joshua P. Holt v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
04/16/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 14, 2019 JOSHUA P. HOLT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 15-CR-550 Brody N. Kane, Judge ___________________________________
Parrish v. Premier Directional Drilling, L.P.public domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: *375 Premier Directional Drilling, L.P., challenges the summary judgment awarded William Parrish, Joshua D. Ellestad, Mario Alfaro, Thomas J. Beckett, and Matthew S. Robbins pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),
Joshua Trent Thompson v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NO. 12-21-00072-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JOSHUA TRENT THOMPSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
KING, Circuit Judge: What follows is the tale of competing mineral leases on the Louisiana property of Lee and Patsy Stockman during the Haynesville Shale leasing frenzy. In April 2008, the Stockmans entered into an extension of their mineral lease with Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P. and received a $240,000 bonus. In May 2008, the Stock-mans entered into a mineral lease with Petroha
Thompson, Joshuapublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD
Streat v. Thompsonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. After reviewing the district court’s complete and detailed order, we find this appeal without merit. AFFIRMED.
Johnson v. J. Walter Thompson U.S.A., LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Erin Johnson filed this action against J. Walter Thompson U.S.A., LLC (“JWT USA”), J. Walter Thompson Company, LLC (“JWT Co.”) (together, “JWT”), WPP PLC (‘WPP”), and Gustavo Martinez (collectively, “Defendants”) on March 10, 2016. (See Dkt. No. 1.) Johnson alleges that JWT and WPP discriminated and retaliated against her on the basis of he
REL: January 20, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TER
THOMAS, Judge. P.S. (“the mother”) appeals the judgment of the Jefferson Juvenile Court terminating her parental rights to M.S. (“the *793child”) on August 23, 2012.1 We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. In 2008, the Jefferson County Department of Human Resour
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Sep 19 2017, 8:47 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. State of Mississippipublic domain
KING, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In this interlocutory appeal, the Court must determine whether the location of a foreign corporation's registered agent is relevant when determining the appropriate venue for an action. We find that the adoption of the Registered Agents Act ("RAA") made the location of a corporation's registered agent irrelevant for purposes of venue.
Bruner v. Zawackipublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This matter is pending for consideration of Plaintiffs Raleigh Bruner’s and Wildcat Moving, LLC’s motion for summary judgment. [Record No. 72] The Plaintiffs contends that they are entitled to summary judgment on their claim that the notice, protest, and hearing provisions of the Kentucky statutes applicable to moving companies, contained within K
Thompson, Chief Justice. This appeal involves interpretation of the Charter Schools Act of 1998 (the “Act”), OCGA § 20-2-2060 et seq., regarding the authority of the Atlanta Independent School System (“APS”) and the Atlanta Board of Education to deduct a $38.6 million unfunded pension liability expense before calculating the amount of local revenue funds to be distributed to start-up charter schools within APS.