Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Joshua L. Gallagher and Kendra R. Gallagher”
Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge Defendant Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”) moves for reconsideration of this Court’s May 8, 2017 summary judgment order. (Op. & Order, Doc. *752184). The parties also filed cross-motions in limine regarding the burden of proof on the issue of damages. (Docs.
Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge A .truck, filled with millions of dollars’ worth of pharmaceuticals was stolen. The trucking company — Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”) — is at fault. The shipper — Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz") — claims that the pharmaceuticals were worth $8.6 million. A federal statute — the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 et seq
Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.public domain
OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Exel, Inc. (“Exel”), a shipping broker, sued Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”), an interstate motor carrier, after SRT lost a shipment of pharmaceutical products it had agreed to transport for Exel on
William J. Denning v. CSX Transportation, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 11, 2013 Session WILLIAM J. DENNING v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 25993C C. L. Rogers, Judge No. M2012-01077-COA-R3-CV - Filed October 9, 2013 This appeal arises from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff in an action filed pursuant t
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published
810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2011) In re HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. Case No. 09md2087BTM (CAB). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 29, 2011. *1104 Gayle M. Blatt, Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield LLP, Todd D. Carpenter, Tonna K. Farrar, Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint,
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'