Cases

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

Cite as 2017 Ark. 73 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-17-54 JIM R. NASH Opinion Delivered March 2, 2017 APPELLANT V. PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DISSENTING OPINION ON DENIAL OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS.

1 Reported in 161 P.2d 326. On or about May 19, 1943, Josephine Nash instituted an action for divorce against her husband, Theodore Nash, in Pierce county, Washington. The defendant did not appear in that action. On June 29, 1943, the court, after hearing testimony and after making findings of fact and conclusions of law, made and entered an interlocutory decree of divorce in favor of

Defendant was entitled to have the minutes of the hearing before the referee placed before the court at Special Term. (Aron v. Aron, 280 N. Y. 328. See, also, Rules Civ. Prae. rule 170.) Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further action in accordance herewith. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon,'Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

7 S.W.3d 350 (1999) 68 Ark.App. 313 Marvin CARMICAL and Margaret E. Carmical v. David McAFEE. No. CA 99-430. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. December 22, 1999. *354 J.R. Nash, Little Rock, for appellants. Snellgrove, Langley, Lovett & Culpepper, by: Todd Williams, Jonesboro, for appel

Cupp, J., dissenting. {¶ 43} Ohio’s workers’ compensation system, enacted pursuant to state constitutional authority, is a wholly statutory system. Section 35, Article II, Ohio Constitution; R.C. Chapter 4123; Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 250, 2010-Ohio-1027, 927 N.E.2d 1066, ¶ 74, 75; Bickers v. W. & S. Life Ins. Co.,

NORRIS, Judge. Chester L. Nash, a thirty year old man, was charged by bill of information with aggravated crime against nature, LSA-R.S. 14:89.1, and attempted aggravated rape, LSA-R.S. 14:27 and LSA-R.S. 14:42. After a jury trial Nash was found guilty of both charges. He was sentenced to 15 years at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence on the aggravated crime against nature conviction

(2008) Elena BROWN, Plaintiff, v. The ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, Defendant. No. 06-CV-688C(SC). United States District Court, W.D. New York. June 3, 2008. INTRODUCTION JOHN T. CURTIN, District Judge. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in this action on March 20, 2007 (Item 5) alleging that defendant terminated her employment and discrimi

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Elena Brown appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant-appellee St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc., (“Travelers”) granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint and to compel arbitration of her Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal. We review a

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Elena Brown appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant-appellee St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc., (“Travelers”) granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint and to compel arbitration of her Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal. We review a

PRESIDING JUSTICE NASH delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Melissa Obernauf, brought a small claims action for breach of oral contract against her former co-lessee, Josephine (Heugh) Haberstich, based upon a mutual promise to divide apartment expenses equally until termination of the lease. After a bench trial, plaintiff’s request for damages for back

74 Ill.2d 164 (1978) 384 N.E.2d 365 LILLIAN CASSON et al., Appellees, v. GORDON NASH, Appellant. No. 50311. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed December 4, 1978. Rehearing denied January 25, 1979. *165 *166 Peterson, Ross, Schloerb & Seidel, of

370 N.E.2d 564 (1977) 54 Ill. App.3d 783 12 Ill.Dec. 760 Lillian CASSON and Josephine Pustz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gordon NASH, Defendant-Appellee. No. 76-354. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. November 15, 1977. As Modified December 13, 1977.

Dunn, J. At the time of her death, intestate, the domicile of Sarah Wood Lemon was in Massachusetts, She there left property for administration, and she also left property to be administered in the State of Maine. Administrations were granted in the different States, first in Massachusetts and later in Maine, to one Bennett Benari. He accepted the distinct trusts. Alleging that she had rendered personal services for the intestat

Watebman, P. J. When this cause was called for trial, appellant presented an affidavit for a continuance which failed to state that she had no other witness by whom she could prove the facts stated in her affidavit as completely as by the absent witness; for this and other reasons the court properly refused to continue the'ease. Jarvis v. Shacklock, 60 Ill. 378.

Mr. Justice Bailey delivered the opinion of the Court: The only errors assigned in this case are such as call in question the rulings of the Superior Court upon the appellant’s motion for a continuance. The action is assumpsit, brought by the appellee upon a promissory note, executed by the appellant, payable to her own order and by her endorsed in blank, the declaration cons

Josephine Linker Hart, Judge. Eugene Bilo appeals the trial court’s finding that he diverted a natural watercourse from his property onto the land of El Dorado Broadcasting Company (EDB). Bilo argues that he diverted surface water, which the common-enemy doctrine allowed him to do without incurring liability. He also argues that the trial court did not provide objective criteria to enforce the judgment. We a

Cite as 2020 Ark. 338 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-09-990 CHARLES EDWARD JONES Opinion Delivered: October 22, 2020 PETITIONER PRO SE SECOND PETITION TO REINVEST V. JURISDICTION IN THE TRIAL COURT TO

332 S.W.3d 24 (2009) 2009 Ark. App. 621 Gary HOWARD, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Odis Howard, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lauren ADAMS, Don Brady, Todd Mazzanti, and Adams & Brady & Jackson, P.L.L.C., Appellees. No. CA 08-1190. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. September 30, 2009. *26</

McDONALD, J. **175This certified appeal requires us to construe General Statutes § 52-593a,1 a *1132remedial savings statute that operates to render an action timely commenced as long as process is delivered to a marshal pri