Cases

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Duty Free Americas, Inc. (“DFA”), which operates duty free stores in many international airports nationwide, appeals the district court’s dismissal of its multi-count suit against The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc. (“Estée Lauder”), the largest manufacturer of beauty products sold in duty free retail outlets in the United States. DFA claims that Estée Lauder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRINCESS SAKYI, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1863 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND

BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge Upon consideration of the plaintiff Princess Sakyi's Motion to Extend the Deadline for Class Certification ("Pl.'s Mot."), ECF No. 17, the memoranda submitted in support and opposition, and the entire record herein, the plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff initiated this action, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against defendants Estee Lauder Companies

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. This is primarily an antitrust case. Plaintiff Duty Free Americas, Inc. (DFA) operates duty-free stores in airports and one of the main products it carries is beauty products. Defendant The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. (ELC) supplies many duty-free stores with its beauty products, but it no longer deals with DFA. DFA allege

375 F.Supp. 1206 (1974) BAY CITY-ABRAHAMS BROS., INC., Plaintiff, v. ESTEE LAUDER, INC., Defendant. No. 73 Civ. 4207 (JMC). United States District Court, S. D. New York. May 17, 1974. *1207 *1208 Marshall C. Berger, New York City (Hahn, Hessen, Margolis & Ryan, New York City, of counsel),

*17LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, a group of British writers and performers known as “Monty Python,”1 appeal from a denial by Judge Lasker in the Southern District of a preliminary injunction to restrain the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) from broadcasting edited versions of three separate programs originally written and performed b

PER CURIAM. Appellant Ivette Santiago-Marrero claims on appeal that the district court erroneously denied her the opportunity to amend her discrimination complaint. She alleges that an employee of the federal government harassed her and caused her to be terminated from her job “because she was a Puerto Rican who could not speak English.” We vacate the dismissal of her complaint ag

499 F.3d 950 (2007) Fatemah AZIZIAN; Soraya Farrah; Eunice Fey; Rose Gonzales; Kazuko Y. Morgan; Nicola Nelson-Torres; Monique Patrick; Judith Pogran; Pamela Powell; Shirley Powell; Rose Skillman on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; Hannah Feldman; Nikki Hurst Gibson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Kamela Wilkinson, Appellant, Susan Casenza; Valerie Theng Matherne, Intervenors-Appellees, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.;

County of Suffolk v Ironshore Indem., Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 06099) County of Suffolk v Ironshore Indem., Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 06099 Decided on October 28, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge. Plaintiffs TGG Ultimate Holdings, Inc., TGG Holdings, Inc., TGG Sub Inc., and The Gordian Group, Inc. (collectively, “TGG”) commenced this action against Defendants Joseph Hollett (“Hollett”), John Ledezma (“Ledezma”), Laura Romero (“Romero”), and Martin Garcia (“Garcia”) (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting claims of breach of contract a

MEMORANDUM * Appellant Kamela Wilkinson appeals from the district court’s certification of a nationwide class of consumers of department store cosmetics, represented by Plaintiffs-Appellees, and approval of a final settlement of their antitrust claims against Defendants-Appellees. Wilkinson also objects to the district court’s referral of certain matters to a special master without the consent of unnamed c

Barnett, Judge: In this action, Plaintiff, Aspects Furniture International, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "AFI"), contests the denial of two protests 1 challenging U.S. Customs and Border Protection's ("CBP" or "Customs") allegedly untimely liquidation of ten entries associated with those protests. See genera

Judge SACK concurs in the result in a separate opinion. STRAUB, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Simone Kelly-Brown (“Kelly-Brown”) is the owner of a motivational services business, Own Your Power Communications, Inc., that holds events and puts out publications under the registered service mark “Own Your Power.” Defendants Oprah Winfrey (“Oprah”), Harpo, Inc., and Harpo Productions, Inc. (collectively, “Harpo”),

*172OPINION OF THE COURT Kenneth R. Fisher, J. Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint which alleges (1) improper use of trade secrets and breach of alleged fiduciary duty, (2) copyright infringement, and (3) a claim in prima facie tort. The copyright infringement claim was dismissed by order dated January 5, 2006.

BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS")'s Motion and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims, ECF No. [43] ("Motion"), filed on March 13, 2018. The Court heard oral argument on the Motion on July 19, 2018. ECF No. [111]; see also Oral Argument Transcript, ECF No. [112]. The Court h

OPINION Sweet, D.J. Plaintiffs The Netherlands Insurance Company (“Netherlands”) and Arthur Lange, Inc. (“Lange”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for partial summary judgment declaring that the defendant United Specialty Insurance Company (“United” or the “Defendant”) owes Lange a duty to defend and indemnify in the action Donizete J

Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge These consolidated cases arise out of the termination of a longstanding business relationship between plaintiff James H. Fischer and defendants Stephen T. Forrest, Jr., Sandra F. Forrest, Shane R. Gebauer, and Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, Inc. ("Brushy" and collectively, "Defendants"). Fischer alleges that the Defendants used his likeness and proprietary text and images to promote their

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On February 28, 2012, Plaintiff Ashley Stanwood, along with other individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought a nationwide putative class action against three cosmetic companies, Mary Kay, Inc. (“Mary Kay”), The Estee Lauder

824 F.Supp.2d 389 (2011) GROUT SHIELD DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ELIO E. SALVO, INC. d/b/a Miracle Sealants Company, Defendant. No. 11-CV-3543 (JFB) (ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 16, 2011. *392 Harold G. Furlow, Esq., Bay Shore, N.Y., for Plaintiff. Marshall Beil, Esq., McGuireWoods LLP

Slip Op. 11-116 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : BP OIL SUPPLY COMPANY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : Court No. 04-00321 UNITED