Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joseph Walker”
JOSEPH WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOSEPH WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-2467 [December 19, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circu
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice Benny Joseph Walker appeals from his convictions on two counts of super-aggra *602 vated sexual assault of a child (cause numbers 16,407 and 16,409), one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child (cause number 16,408), and 125 counts of pos
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY SHERRY RADACK CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CHIEF JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT TERRY JENNINGS JANET WILLIAMS EVELYN KEYES CHIE
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-13-00739-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
MANDATE Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00742-CR BENNY JOSEPH WALKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 21st District Court of Washington County. (Tr. Ct. 16,410). TO THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, GREETINGS
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00741-CR BENNY JOSEPH WALKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 21st District Court of Washington County. (Tr. Ct. 16,409). This case is an appeal from the final jud
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY SHERRY RADACK CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CHIEF JUSTICE CLERK OF THE COURT TERRY JENNINGS JANET WILLIAMS EVELYN KEYES
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
FILED IN IN Tie Ceuri of APP ectfcKSSST^f CHRISTOPHER /y^E Benny 3hs^h Uj^lKif/Appoticnf -f Aff&ulf; ©^ (\c»i«; f/e&. /£; t/OT ^ Ftf/- (^od Cctai?e ctppeUctU. a*£s> ~H^S Oar^ & 0f abv? $UUA c^uq&s; ^ ms, J«Uh, %€L*k^f D'^ A-Ho-n^ aJr^e^^/vGt^v>\ "JTp/q c A f I
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
HIED IN (H The. Cevri 6? APP e^RSE?^ To, TU Pirsi DiWl-tW ^ TiW5 CHRISTOPHER Kfyit Benny 3h>s«f>l> Uj^lKe-fjiAppeii^f •§ Affefi([f *? (Xs>±es J/c*. & Ifpi > y c W*K [(o>V
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
£|o| t=/>7, 3.6^J^c _/, t47 -n.„ GL*^ ^Ce^+ ,row4 PA**, TW-* ^^7 c*, ,< »< Oo^ %4£ W *-"""•"' * , ,< t-;/ t / / jam* ',, 4-,^^ , FILED IN SST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS JAN 16 2015 CHRISTOPHER ISTOPHER A^fHilME
Benny Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
<2.!Ol t-^- ^ ^ -c n/^47 7b,:'rKj? c;~ RlSV^ +,;»/ ^ ^ . j _ 0.^<«^ «**"7^. <./ **'« Col n- p'*^ 7^;^^;J^' ' FILED IN fST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS JAN 1 6 2015 CHRISTOPHER A^PKiNE ISTOPHER flUPH CLERK]
Joseph Walker v. Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-03-00924-CR Joseph WALKER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, <
Walker v. Josephpublic domain
Walker v Joseph (2025 NY Slip Op 02809) Walker v Joseph 2025 NY Slip Op 02809 Decided on May 7, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Chapter 7 JUDGMENT ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN E. WAITES, US Bankruptcy Judge, District of South Carolina Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the attached Order, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs Arabi Gin Company, BCT Gin Company, Inc., Coley Gin & Fertilizer Company, Jones Cou
ORDER JOHN E. WAITES, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge, District of South Carolina This matter is before the Court following a trial on the complaint in the above-captioned adversary proceeding. The parties have expressly consented to this Court’s entry of final orders and judg-merits. Therefore, the Court is permitted “to hear and determine and to enter appropriate orders and judgments.”1
ORDER JOHN E. WAITES, Chief Judge. Defendant Nicholas Peter Francis Ear-lam brings this matter before the Court upon a Motion for a Protective Order (the “Motion”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)1 as to the time and location of a deposition noticed by Plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 30(b).2 Plaintiffs sought to depose Ear-lam — a resident of the United
Joseph Gene Walker v. Statepublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., HODGES, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL F
United States v. Francis Joseph Walkerpublic domain
175 F.3d 1012 U.S.v.Francis Joseph Walker NO. 96-2078 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. February 03, 1999 1 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. 2 Affirmed.
WALKER, JR., JOSEPH, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 158 KA 14-01870 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH WALKER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR.
WALKER, JR., JOSEPH, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 159 KA 16-00958 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND NEMOYER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH WALKER, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR.