Cases

208 P.3d 901 (2009) 2009-NMSC-021 Laura A. CORDOVA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. WORLD FINANCE CORPORATION OF NEW MEXICO, Defendant-Petitioner. No. 30,536. Supreme Court of New Mexico. April 29, 2009. *904 Barnett Law Firm, P.A., Mickey D. Barnett, Phillip W. Cheves, David A. Garcia, Amy B. Bailey, Wolf and Fo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: In 2013, Paul Nungesser. was accused of rape by fellow Columbia University (“Co*351lumbia”) student Emma Sulkowicz. Sul-kowicz filed a complaint with Columbia’s Office of Gender-Based Misconduct and, after an investigation and hearing, a panel convened by Columbia found Nunges

932 F.Supp. 475 (1995) Joseph Richard PAWLOWSKI, Petitioner, v. Walter R. KELLY, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 89-CV-1443A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 11, 1995. *476 *477 *478

266 S.C. 274 (1976) 222 S.E.2d 773 Betty C. MOCK, Appellant, v. G.G. DOWLING and Bankers Trust Company, Executors of the Estate of Lois Carter, Respondents. 20181 Supreme Court of South Carolina. March 3, 1976. Messrs. Gerald H. Cohen, and Thomas R. Taggart, of Savannah, Ga., and Ray P. McClain, of Epstein, McClain &am;

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice: T1 Jaime and Marie Gorostieta (the "Go-rostietas"), as guardians ad litem for their daughter Dalinda Gorostieta, appeal from a judgment rendered in regard to their daughter. The Gorostictas argue that the trial court erred in not allowing Marie Gorosticta to testify regarding the amounts contained in medical bills incurred as a result of Dalinda's injury, and also in its ruling regarding ju

Chancellor Rutpedge afterwards delivered the decree of the court, In-this pase the court see no reason for setting aside the sale made by the sheriff; the execution under which the sale was made being regularly obtained against Spierin and wife, for a debt contracted by her before marriage, and for which the property she then possessed was liable, (her husband having none J although secured by m

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0167p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JANE DOE, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Bussey, Justice (concurring in result) : This appeal presents for decision only a single, narrow question. Appellant’s sole contention is that “under the language” of the Frazier grant her title extends to the usual low water mark of Salt Creek. The majority opinion holds that she has failed to prove her “title to the land to the low water mark on Salt Creek”, which is dispositive of her appeal and to thi

Bell, Judge. The controversies presented in this appeal, stemming as they do from a contract creating a long-term lease of realty, necessitate that we first examine the agreement for ambiguity. If unambiguous, the construction of the contract, under authority of numerous decisions of our appellate courts *132and Code § 20-701, is a question of law which the court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge. Libellant brought an action in admiralty against the United States, owner of the vessel SS Langdon Cheves, for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment on board the ship while he was an employee of a subcontractor. He alleged that the shipowner was negligent and that the vessel was unseaworthy. The United States, under Adm

1. In this action, which comes under the provisions of the Code (Ann. Supp.), § 105-1306, it was unnecessary for the plaintiffs to allege which is the husband and which are the children of the deceased, their ages, or how the value of the life should be apportioned among those entitled to sue; and the special demurrers to the petition based on such grounds were properly overruled. (a) The plaintiffs named in the action were sufficiently identified by the allegation that t

The facts appear from the adjudication of Lamorelle, P. J., Auditing Judge. Ann Stewardson, who died in 1883, gave one-third of her residuary estate in trust to pay the net income thereof in equal parts to the two daughters of her brother, Thomas Stewardson, to wit, Anna and Mary E. Stewardson, and his son, Langdon Cheves Steward-son, until the death of the survivor, and upon the death of the survivor, to the t

THE only point made in this case was on the construction of the will of the defendant’s testator. The case was as follows : Mr. Whaley made and duly exe~ cute¿ ]j]s ]ast will and testament, by which he made the devises and bequests. “ With respect to my w°rdly estate, I leave in manner following : Item — I give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Mary Whaley, the use of my plantation on Edisto Island, known by the name of the Old House Tract, adjoining

November 4, 1937. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an action for damages on account of an alleged libelous letter, dated December 19, 1934, and written to and concerning the plaintiff by the general manager of the defendant, "a copy thereof being mailed to one W.S. Penland and divers other persons, in the County of Laurens". On December 11, 1935, service of the summons and complaint was made upon the Insurance Commissioner of South Carolina, who immediately forwarded the pape

*Tho Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the [*328 court. Error is assigned in this case upon the matters contained in a bill of exceptions, and is said to consist in the overruling by the court below, of a receipt offered in evidence by the defendant there, the plaintiff in this court. Tucker declared on a promissory note, alleged to have been made by Patterson, and afterwards, and without payment by him, improp

187 F.2d 860 ACKERMAN, Atty. Gen.v.INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S & WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION et al.BEVINS, County Atty. et al.v.INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S & WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION et al.(two cases).ACKERMAN, Atty. Gen. et al.v.INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S & WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION et al. Nos. 12300, 12301. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

*28The opinion of the Court was delivered by Clover, J. After a plea of not guilty, a prisoner cannot avail himself of a misnomer, either on the trial or in arrest of judgment or on motion for a new trial. (State vs. Thompson, Cheves, 31.) But it is insisted that the entry on the indictment is not a general denial. Technically the term trav

POPE, Circuit Judge. These are appeals from judgments in two actions brought by the International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union (ILWU), a labor union, and by certain individual members of that union, to enjoin the prosecution of four criminal proceedings pending in the circuit court of the Territory of Hawaii, one for riot and conspiracy, and three for riot. The court below entered final decrees granting permanent